These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32028073)

  • 41. A quantitative confidence signal detection model: 2. Confidence analysis.
    Yi Y; Wang W; Merfeld DM
    J Neurophysiol; 2019 Sep; 122(3):904-921. PubMed ID: 31215314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The impact of evidence reliability on sensitivity and bias in decision confidence.
    Boldt A; de Gardelle V; Yeung N
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Aug; 43(8):1520-1531. PubMed ID: 28383959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Ignorance- versus evidence-based decision making: a decision time analysis of the recognition heuristic.
    Hilbig BE; Pohl RF
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Sep; 35(5):1296-305. PubMed ID: 19686022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Children's probability intuitions: understanding the expected value of complex gambles.
    Schlottmann A
    Child Dev; 2001; 72(1):103-22. PubMed ID: 11280473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Gunslingers, poker players, and chickens 1: Decision making under physical performance pressure in elite athletes.
    Parkin BL; Warriner K; Walsh V
    Prog Brain Res; 2017; 234():291-316. PubMed ID: 29031468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Foreign Language does not Affect Gambling-Related Judgments.
    Muda R; Walker AC; Pieńkosz D; Fugelsang JA; Białek M
    J Gambl Stud; 2020 Jun; 36(2):633-652. PubMed ID: 32060773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Dissociation between decision making under ambiguity and risk in patients with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy.
    Paiva ML; Rzezak P; Santos B; Lima EM; Moschetta SP; Vincentiis S; Alessi R; Mendoza M; Valente KD
    Epilepsy Behav; 2019 Dec; 101(Pt A):106548. PubMed ID: 31678809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Does mental number line training work? The effects of cognitive training on real-life mathematics, numeracy, and decision making.
    Sobkow A; Fulawka K; Tomczak P; Zjawiony P; Traczyk J
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2019 Sep; 25(3):372-385. PubMed ID: 30730159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Perception and misperception of bias in human judgment.
    Pronin E
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2007 Jan; 11(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 17129749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Concurrent explanations can enhance visual decision making.
    Leisti T; Radun J; Virtanen T; Nyman G; Häkkinen J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Jan; 145():65-74. PubMed ID: 24301018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Probability Theory Plus Noise: Descriptive Estimation and Inferential Judgment.
    Costello F; Watts P
    Top Cogn Sci; 2018 Jan; 10(1):192-208. PubMed ID: 29383882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. On the Flexibility of Basic Risk Attitudes in Monkeys.
    Farashahi S; Azab H; Hayden B; Soltani A
    J Neurosci; 2018 May; 38(18):4383-4398. PubMed ID: 29626169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Expertise and gambling: using type 2 signal detection theory to investigate differences between regular gamblers and nongamblers.
    Lueddeke SE; Higham PA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Sep; 64(9):1850-71. PubMed ID: 21846266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Decision making in ambiguous and risky situations after unilateral temporal lobe epilepsy surgery.
    Bonatti E; Kuchukhidze G; Zamarian L; Trinka E; Bodner T; Benke T; Delazer M
    Epilepsy Behav; 2009 Apr; 14(4):665-73. PubMed ID: 19233314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The effect of analytic and experiential modes of thought on moral judgment.
    Kvaran T; Nichols S; Sanfey A
    Prog Brain Res; 2013; 202():187-96. PubMed ID: 23317833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Yes, they can! Appropriate weighting of small probabilities as a function of information acquisition.
    Hilbig BE; Glöckner A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Nov; 138(3):390-6. PubMed ID: 21974869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Risk approximation in decision making: approximative numeric abilities predict advantageous decisions under objective risk.
    Mueller SM; Schiebener J; Delazer M; Brand M
    Cogn Process; 2018 Aug; 19(3):297-315. PubMed ID: 29357078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Grouping information for judgments.
    Shah AK; Oppenheimer DM
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2011 Feb; 140(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 21299316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Does future-oriented thinking predict adolescent decision making?
    Eskritt M; Doucette J; Robitaille L
    J Genet Psychol; 2014; 175(1-2):163-79. PubMed ID: 24796162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Feedback produces divergence from prospect theory in descriptive choice.
    Jessup RK; Bishara AJ; Busemeyer JR
    Psychol Sci; 2008 Oct; 19(10):1015-22. PubMed ID: 19000212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.