These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32028073)

  • 61. Dynamic prospect theory: Two core decision theories coexist in the gambling behavior of monkeys and humans.
    Tymula A; Wang X; Imaizumi Y; Kawai T; Kunimatsu J; Matsumoto M; Yamada H
    Sci Adv; 2023 May; 9(20):eade7972. PubMed ID: 37205752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Neural substrates of reward magnitude, probability, and risk during a wheel of fortune decision-making task.
    Smith BW; Mitchell DG; Hardin MG; Jazbec S; Fridberg D; Blair RJ; Ernst M
    Neuroimage; 2009 Jan; 44(2):600-9. PubMed ID: 18804540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Perceiving the intentions of others: how do skilled performers make anticipation judgments?
    Williams AM
    Prog Brain Res; 2009; 174():73-83. PubMed ID: 19477331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Suboptimal decision criteria are predicted by subjectively weighted probabilities and rewards.
    Ackermann JF; Landy MS
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Feb; 77(2):638-58. PubMed ID: 25366822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Confirmation Bias through Selective Overweighting of Choice-Consistent Evidence.
    Talluri BC; Urai AE; Tsetsos K; Usher M; Donner TH
    Curr Biol; 2018 Oct; 28(19):3128-3135.e8. PubMed ID: 30220502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Cognitive distortions as a component and treatment focus of pathological gambling: a review.
    Fortune EE; Goodie AS
    Psychol Addict Behav; 2012 Jun; 26(2):298-310. PubMed ID: 22121918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Reasoning in psychosis: risky but not necessarily hasty.
    Moritz S; Scheu F; Andreou C; Pfueller U; Weisbrod M; Roesch-Ely D
    Cogn Neuropsychiatry; 2016; 21(2):91-106. PubMed ID: 26884221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Are probabilities overweighted or underweighted when rare outcomes are experienced (rarely)?
    Ungemach C; Chater N; Stewart N
    Psychol Sci; 2009 Apr; 20(4):473-9. PubMed ID: 19399978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Uncertainty plus prior equals rational bias: an intuitive Bayesian probability weighting function.
    Fennell J; Baddeley R
    Psychol Rev; 2012 Oct; 119(4):878-87. PubMed ID: 22800412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. On the provenance of judgments of conditional probability.
    Zhao J; Shah A; Osherson D
    Cognition; 2009 Oct; 113(1):26-36. PubMed ID: 19665110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Beware how you compare: comparison direction dictates stimulus-valence-modulated presentation-order effects in preference judgment.
    Englund MP; Hellström Å
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Jul; 75(5):1001-11. PubMed ID: 23592182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Decisions under risk in Parkinson's disease: preserved evaluation of probability and magnitude.
    Sharp ME; Viswanathan J; McKeown MJ; Appel-Cresswell S; Stoessl AJ; Barton JJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Nov; 51(13):2679-89. PubMed ID: 23954375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Is social decision making for close others consistent across domains and within individuals?
    Guassi Moreira JF; Tashjian SM; Galván A; Silvers JA
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2020 Aug; 149(8):1509-1526. PubMed ID: 31804124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Judgment and Decision Making.
    Fischhoff B; Broomell SB
    Annu Rev Psychol; 2020 Jan; 71():331-355. PubMed ID: 31337275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Altered adaptive but not veridical decision-making in substance dependent individuals.
    Verdejo-García A; Vilar-López R; Pérez-García M; Podell K; Goldberg E
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2006 Jan; 12(1):90-9. PubMed ID: 16433948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Effect of training, education, professional experience, and need for cognition on accuracy of exposure assessment decision-making.
    Vadali M; Ramachandran G; Banerjee S
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2012 Apr; 56(3):292-304. PubMed ID: 22186374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. A potential dissociation between perception and production version for bounded but not unbounded number line estimation.
    Reinert RM; Gashaj V; Hartmann M; Moeller K
    Trends Neurosci Educ; 2023 Jun; 31():100202. PubMed ID: 37308259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Do individual differences in Iowa Gambling Task performance predict adaptive decision making for risky gains and losses?
    Weller JA; Levin IP; Bechara A
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2010 Feb; 32(2):141-50. PubMed ID: 19484643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Age differences in experiential and deliberative processes in unambiguous and ambiguous decision making.
    Huang YH; Wood S; Berger DE; Hanoch Y
    Psychol Aging; 2015 Sep; 30(3):675-87. PubMed ID: 26280384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. The effects of alcohol on sequential decision-making biases during gambling.
    Tobias-Webb J; Limbrick-Oldfield EH; Vearncombe S; Duka T; Clark L
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2020 Feb; 237(2):395-407. PubMed ID: 31664479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.