These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32028073)
81. The effect of introspection on judgment and decision making is dependent on the quality of conscious thinking. Leisti T; Häkkinen J Conscious Cogn; 2016 May; 42():340-351. PubMed ID: 27131852 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
82. Oral administration of 5-hydroxytryptophan (5-HTP) impairs decision making under ambiguity but not under risk: evidence from the Iowa Gambling Task. Gendle MH; Golding AC Hum Psychopharmacol; 2010 Aug; 25(6):491-9. PubMed ID: 20737522 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
83. The Empirical Case for Acquiescing to Intuition. Walco DK; Risen JL Psychol Sci; 2017 Dec; 28(12):1807-1820. PubMed ID: 29040055 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
84. A parallel accumulator model accounts for decision randomness when deciding on risky prospects with different expected value. Howlett JR; Paulus MP PLoS One; 2020; 15(7):e0233761. PubMed ID: 32702026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
85. Pillars of judgment: how memory abilities affect performance in rule-based and exemplar-based judgments. Hoffmann JA; von Helversen B; Rieskamp J J Exp Psychol Gen; 2014 Dec; 143(6):2242-61. PubMed ID: 25285427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
86. Decision-making under risk and ambiguity in low-birth-weight pigs. Murphy E; Kraak L; van den Broek J; Nordquist RE; van der Staay FJ Anim Cogn; 2015 Mar; 18(2):561-72. PubMed ID: 25527296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
87. Distinct cognitive mechanisms in a gambling task share neural mechanisms. Steffen A; Rockstroh B; Wienbruch C; Miller GA Psychophysiology; 2011 Aug; 48(8):1037-46. PubMed ID: 21265864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
88. Experiential limitation in judgment and decision. Hahn U Top Cogn Sci; 2014 Apr; 6(2):229-44. PubMed ID: 24648405 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
89. Judgment and decision making. Mellers BA; Schwartz A; Cooke AD Annu Rev Psychol; 1998; 49():447-77. PubMed ID: 9496629 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
90. Hypothesis generation, probability judgment, and individual differences in working memory capacity. Dougherty MR; Hunter JE Acta Psychol (Amst); 2003 Jul; 113(3):263-82. PubMed ID: 12834999 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
91. Gunslingers, poker players, and chickens 2: Decision-making under physical performance pressure in subelite athletes. Parkin BL; Walsh V Prog Brain Res; 2017; 234():317-338. PubMed ID: 29031469 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
92. Using fuzzy-trace theory to understand and improve health judgments, decisions, and behaviors: A literature review. Blalock SJ; Reyna VF Health Psychol; 2016 Aug; 35(8):781-792. PubMed ID: 27505197 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
93. Social Distance Reduces the Biases of Overweighting Small Probabilities and Underweighting Large Probabilities. Sun Q; Lu J; Zhang H; Liu Y Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2021 Aug; 47(8):1309-1324. PubMed ID: 33331239 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
94. The covariance decomposition of the probability score and its use in evaluating prognostic estimates. SUPPORT Investigators. Arkes HR; Dawson NV; Speroff T; Harrell FE; Alzola C; Phillips R; Desbiens N; Oye RK; Knaus W; Connors AF Med Decis Making; 1995; 15(2):120-31. PubMed ID: 7783572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
95. Relationship of γ-aminobutyric acid and glutamate+glutamine concentrations in the perigenual anterior cingulate cortex with performance of Cambridge Gambling Task. Fujihara K; Narita K; Suzuki Y; Takei Y; Suda M; Tagawa M; Ujita K; Sakai Y; Narumoto J; Near J; Fukuda M Neuroimage; 2015 Apr; 109():102-8. PubMed ID: 25583607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
96. Anterior cingulate activity modulates nonlinear decision weight function of uncertain prospects. Paulus MP; Frank LR Neuroimage; 2006 Apr; 30(2):668-77. PubMed ID: 16321546 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
97. Know the risk, take the win: how executive functions and probability processing influence advantageous decision making under risk conditions. Brand M; Schiebener J; Pertl MT; Delazer M J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2014; 36(9):914-29. PubMed ID: 25252799 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
98. Increases in Emotional Intelligence After an Online Training Program Are Associated With Better Decision-Making on the Iowa Gambling Task. Alkozei A; Smith R; Demers LA; Weber M; Berryhill SM; Killgore WDS Psychol Rep; 2019 Jun; 122(3):853-879. PubMed ID: 29699472 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
99. Exemplars in the mist: the cognitive substrate of the representativeness heuristic. Nilsson H; Juslin P; Olsson H Scand J Psychol; 2008 Jun; 49(3):201-12. PubMed ID: 18419587 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
100. Task Constraints Affect Mapping From Approximate Number System Estimates to Symbolic Numbers. Chesney DL; Matthews PG Front Psychol; 2018; 9():1801. PubMed ID: 30386272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]