These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32028191)

  • 81. Contralateral inhibition of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in young noise-exposed Veterans.
    Bramhall NF; Kampel SD; Reavis KM; Konrad-Martin D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 Dec; 152(6):3562. PubMed ID: 36586855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 82. Criteria for detection of transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions in schoolchildren.
    Trzaskowski B; Pilka E; Jedrzejczak WW; Skarzynski H
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Sep; 79(9):1455-61. PubMed ID: 26166450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 83. The effects of crossed olivocochlear bundle section on transient evoked otoacoustic emissions.
    Kakigi A; Hirakawa H; Mount RJ; Harrison RV
    Hear Res; 1997 Aug; 110(1-2):34-8. PubMed ID: 9282887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 84. Easy and Hard Auditory Tasks Distinguished by Otoacoustic Emissions and Event-related Potentials: Insights into Efferent System Activity.
    Jedrzejczak WW; Milner R; Pilka E; Ganc M; Skarzynski H
    Neuroscience; 2022 May; 491():87-97. PubMed ID: 35398177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 85. The medial olivocochlear reflex in children during active listening.
    Smith SB; Cone B
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Aug; 54(8):518-23. PubMed ID: 25735203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 86. Transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in a group of professional singers who have normal pure-tone hearing thresholds.
    Hamdan AL; Abouchacra KS; Zeki Al Hazzouri AG; Zaytoun G
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):360-77. PubMed ID: 18382377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 87. Psychophysical correlates of contralateral efferent suppression. I. The role of the medial olivocochlear system in "central masking" in nonhuman primates.
    Smith DW; Turner DA; Henson MM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Feb; 107(2):933-41. PubMed ID: 10687702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 88. Suppression of otoacoustic emission is unchanged after several minutes of contralateral acoustic stimulation.
    Giraud AL; Collet L; Chéry-Croze S
    Hear Res; 1997 Jul; 109(1-2):78-82. PubMed ID: 9259237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 89. Human medial olivocochlear reflex: Contralateral activation effect on low and high frequency cochlear response.
    Jamos AM; Kaf WA; Chertoff ME; Ferraro JA
    Hear Res; 2020 Apr; 389():107925. PubMed ID: 32088636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 90. [A study on the contralateral suppressive effects of distortion product otoacoustic emissions].
    Wang H; Zhong N
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 1997 Nov; 11(11):489-92. PubMed ID: 10323015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 91. Age related changes to the dynamics of contralateral DPOAE suppression in human subjects.
    Konomi U; Kanotra S; James AL; Harrison RV
    J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2014 Jun; 43(1):15. PubMed ID: 24934087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 92. Musicianship enhances ipsilateral and contralateral efferent gain control to the cochlea.
    Bidelman GM; Schneider AD; Heitzmann VR; Bhagat SP
    Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():275-283. PubMed ID: 27964936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 93. Otoacoustic emissions and effects of contralateral white noise stimulation on transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in diabetic children.
    Ugur AK; Kemaloglu YK; Ugur MB; Gunduz B; Saridogan C; Yesilkaya E; Bideci A; Cinaz P; Goksu N
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 Apr; 73(4):555-9. PubMed ID: 19150138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 94. Measurement of the distribution of medial olivocochlear acoustic reflex strengths across normal-hearing individuals via otoacoustic emissions.
    Backus BC; Guinan JJ
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2007 Dec; 8(4):484-96. PubMed ID: 17932717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 95. Reliability of measures of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions with contralateral suppression.
    Stuart A; Cobb KM
    J Commun Disord; 2015; 58():35-42. PubMed ID: 26431768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 96. Influence of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions on distortion product otoacoustic emission amplitudes.
    Ozturan O; Oysu C
    Hear Res; 1999 Jan; 127(1-2):129-36. PubMed ID: 9925024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 97. Objective assessment of subjective tinnitus through contralateral suppression of otoacoustic emissions by white noise: effects of frequency, gender, tinnitus bilaterality and age.
    Riga M; Komis A; Maragoudakis P; Korres G; Ferekidis E; Danielides V
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2018 Apr; 38(2):131-137. PubMed ID: 29967558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 98. Function of the medial olivocochlear system in children with phonological disorders.
    Didoné DD; Kunst LR; Weich TM; Tochetto TM; Mota HB
    J Soc Bras Fonoaudiol; 2011 Dec; 23(4):358-63. PubMed ID: 22231057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 99. Frequency tuning of the contralateral medial olivocochlear reflex in humans.
    Zhao W; Dhar S
    J Neurophysiol; 2012 Jul; 108(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 22457463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 100. The role of transient-evoked otoacoustic emission testing in the evaluation of elderly persons.
    Bertoli S; Probst R
    Ear Hear; 1997 Aug; 18(4):286-93. PubMed ID: 9288474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.