These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32028222)

  • 1. An improved process for the collection and DNA analysis of fired cartridge cases.
    Bille TW; Fahrig G; Weitz SM; Peiffer GA
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 May; 46():102238. PubMed ID: 32028222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development of STR profiles from firearms and fired cartridge cases.
    Horsman-Hall KM; Orihuela Y; Karczynski SL; Davis AL; Ban JD; Greenspoon SA
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2009 Sep; 3(4):242-50. PubMed ID: 19647709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. DNA recovery from unfired and fired cartridge cases: A comparison of swabbing, tape lifting, vacuum filtration, and direct PCR.
    Prasad E; Hitchcock C; Raymond J; Cole A; Barash M; Gunn P; McNevin D; van Oorschot RAH
    Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Dec; 317():110507. PubMed ID: 32977300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An optimized procedure for obtaining DNA from fired and unfired ammunition.
    Montpetit S; O'Donnell P
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 Jul; 17():70-74. PubMed ID: 25828369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Time since contact influences DNA profiling success of cartridges and fired cartridge casings.
    Winnepenninckx A; Verhoeven E; Vermeulen S; Jeurissen B; Borgers E; Bekaert B
    Forensic Sci Int; 2022 Nov; 340():111474. PubMed ID: 36174383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An investigation of two methods of DNA recovery from fired and unfired 9 mm ammunition.
    Moore D; Beaumont D; Brown M; Clayton T; Coleman K; Subhani Z; Thomson J
    Sci Justice; 2021 Mar; 61(2):160-169. PubMed ID: 33736848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Recovery of DNA from fired and unfired cartridge casings: comparison of two DNA collection methods.
    Elwick K; Gauthier Q; Rink S; Cropper E; Kavlick MF
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2022 Jul; 59():102726. PubMed ID: 35660851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Factors affecting DNA recovery from cartridge cases.
    Jansson L; Forsberg C; Akel Y; Dufva C; Ansell C; Ansell R; Hedman J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Sep; 48():102343. PubMed ID: 32683317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Study of criteria influencing the success rate of DNA swabs in operational conditions: A contribution to an evidence-based approach to crime scene investigation and triage.
    Baechler S
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Jan; 20():130-139. PubMed ID: 26590861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Touch DNA recovery from unfired and fired cartridges: Comparison of swabbing, tape lifting and soaking.
    Prasad E; Hitchcock C; Raymond J; Cole A; Barash M; McNevin D; van Oorschot RAH
    Forensic Sci Int; 2022 Jan; 330():111101. PubMed ID: 34801815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of methods to improve the extraction and recovery of DNA from cotton swabs for forensic analysis.
    Adamowicz MS; Stasulli DM; Sobestanovich EM; Bille TW
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(12):e116351. PubMed ID: 25549111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Recovery of Trace DNA on Clothing: A Comparison of Mini-tape Lifting and Three Other Forensic Evidence Collection Techniques.
    Hess S; Haas C
    J Forensic Sci; 2017 Jan; 62(1):187-191. PubMed ID: 27864934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Improvements, factors, and influences on DNA recovery from firearms.
    Kaesler T; Kirkbride KP; Linacre A
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2023 Jul; 65():102873. PubMed ID: 37094516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of metal ions and DNA recovery from the surface of fired and unfired brass ammunition to improve STR profiling.
    Czado N; Houston R; Hughes S
    Int J Legal Med; 2024 Jul; 138(4):1265-1272. PubMed ID: 38433135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ocular swabs on exhumed bodies: An alternative to the collection of "classical" tissue samples in forensic genetics.
    Agostini V; Bailo P; Chiti E; Linarello P; Gentile G; Primignani P; Giriodi M; Piccinini A
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Jan; 44():102206. PubMed ID: 31765878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Double swab technique for collecting touched evidence.
    Pang BC; Cheung BK
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2007 Jul; 9(4):181-4. PubMed ID: 17320457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Systematic study for DNA recovery and profiling from common IED substrates: From laboratory to casework.
    Phetpeng S; Kitpipit T; Thanakiatkrai P
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 Jul; 17():53-60. PubMed ID: 25828367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Swabs as DNA collection devices for sampling different biological materials from different substrates.
    Verdon TJ; Mitchell RJ; van Oorschot RA
    J Forensic Sci; 2014 Jul; 59(4):1080-9. PubMed ID: 24502761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An integratable microfluidic cartridge for forensic swab samples lysis.
    Yang J; Brooks C; Estes MD; Hurth CM; Zenhausern F
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Jan; 8(1):147-58. PubMed ID: 24315603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In-field collection and preservation of decomposing human tissues to facilitate rapid purification and STR typing.
    Holmes AS; Roman MG; Hughes-Stamm S
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Sep; 36():124-129. PubMed ID: 29990824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.