175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32028270)
1. Automatic bi-objective parameter tuning for inverse planning of high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy.
Maree SC; Bosman PAN; van Wieringen N; Niatsetski Y; Pieters BR; Bel A; Alderliesten T
Phys Med Biol; 2020 Apr; 65(7):075009. PubMed ID: 32028270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of bi-objective treatment planning for high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy-A retrospective observer study.
Maree SC; Luong NH; Kooreman ES; van Wieringen N; Bel A; Hinnen KA; Westerveld H; Pieters BR; Bosman PAN; Alderliesten T
Brachytherapy; 2019; 18(3):396-403. PubMed ID: 30718176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. GPU-accelerated bi-objective treatment planning for prostate high-dose-rate brachytherapy.
Bouter A; Alderliesten T; Pieters BR; Bel A; Niatsetski Y; Bosman PAN
Med Phys; 2019 Sep; 46(9):3776-3787. PubMed ID: 31236948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dosimetric comparison of inverse optimisation methods versus forward optimisation in HDR brachytherapy of breast, cervical and prostate cancer.
Fröhlich G; Geszti G; Vízkeleti J; Ágoston P; Polgár C; Major T
Strahlenther Onkol; 2019 Nov; 195(11):991-1000. PubMed ID: 31482321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Towards artificial intelligence-based automated treatment planning in clinical practice: A prospective study of the first clinical experiences in high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy.
Barten DLJ; Pieters BR; Bouter A; van der Meer MC; Maree SC; Hinnen KA; Westerveld H; Bosman PAN; Alderliesten T; van Wieringen N; Bel A
Brachytherapy; 2023; 22(2):279-289. PubMed ID: 36635201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of IPSA and HIPO inverse planning optimization algorithms for prostate HDR brachytherapy.
Panettieri V; Smith RL; Mason NJ; Millar JL
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 15(6):5055. PubMed ID: 25493531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of dose and catheter optimization algorithms in prostate high-dose-rate brachytherapy.
Poulin E; Varfalvy N; Aubin S; Beaulieu L
Brachytherapy; 2016; 15(1):102-11. PubMed ID: 26561276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Investigating the role of constrained CVT and CVT in HIPO inverse planning for HDR brachytherapy of prostate cancer.
Sachpazidis I; Hense J; Mavroidis P; Gainey M; Baltas D
Med Phys; 2019 Jul; 46(7):2955-2968. PubMed ID: 31055834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of inverse optimization algorithms for HDR/PDR prostate brachytherapy treatment planning.
Dinkla AM; van der Laarse R; Kaljouw E; Pieters BR; Koedooder K; van Wieringen N; Bel A
Brachytherapy; 2015; 14(2):279-88. PubMed ID: 25447341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of two inverse planning algorithms for cervical cancer brachytherapy.
Fu Q; Xu Y; Zuo J; An J; Huang M; Yang X; Chen J; Yan H; Dai J
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2021 Mar; 22(3):157-165. PubMed ID: 33626225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Urethra low-dose tunnels: validation of and class solution for generating urethra-sparing dose plans using inverse planning simulated annealing for prostate high-dose-rate brachytherapy.
Cunha JA; Pouliot J; Weinberg V; Wang-Chesebro A; Roach M; Hsu IC
Brachytherapy; 2012; 11(5):348-53. PubMed ID: 21937284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A GPU-based multi-criteria optimization algorithm for HDR brachytherapy.
Bélanger C; Cui S; Ma Y; Després P; Adam M Cunha J; Beaulieu L
Phys Med Biol; 2019 May; 64(10):105005. PubMed ID: 30970341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluating the impact of real-time multicriteria optimizers integrated with interactive plan navigation tools for HDR brachytherapy.
Bélanger C; Poulin É; Cui S; Vigneault É; Martin AG; Foster W; Després P; Cunha JAM; Beaulieu L
Brachytherapy; 2020; 19(5):607-617. PubMed ID: 32713779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Keeping your best options open with AI-based treatment planning in prostate and cervix brachytherapy.
Dickhoff LRM; Scholman RJ; Barten DLJ; Kerkhof EM; Roorda JJ; Velema LA; Stalpers LJA; Pieters BR; Bosman PAN; Alderliesten T
Brachytherapy; 2024; 23(2):188-198. PubMed ID: 38296658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of anatomy-based inverse planning with simulated annealing and graphical optimization for high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy.
Morton GC; Sankreacha R; Halina P; Loblaw A
Brachytherapy; 2008; 7(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 18037356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Adaptation of the CVT algorithm for catheter optimization in high dose rate brachytherapy.
Poulin E; Fekete CA; Létourneau M; Fenster A; Pouliot J; Beaulieu L
Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111724. PubMed ID: 24320432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of the IPSA and HIPO algorithms for interstitial tongue high-dose-rate brachytherapy.
Choi CH; Park SY; Park JM; Wu HG; Kim JH; Kim JI
PLoS One; 2018; 13(10):e0205229. PubMed ID: 30286187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Dosimetric analysis of different optimization algorithms for three-dimensional brachytherapy for gynecologic tumors].
Ling B; Chen L; Zhang J; Cao X; Ye W; Ouyang Y; Chi F; Ding Z
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2024 Apr; 44(4):773-779. PubMed ID: 38708512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dosimetric and Radiobiological Evaluation of Hybrid Inverse Planning and Optimization for Cervical Cancer Brachytherapy.
Matias Ldos S; Palmqvist T; Wolke J; Nilsson J; Beskow C; Maphossa AM; Toma-Dasu I
Anticancer Res; 2015 Nov; 35(11):6091-6. PubMed ID: 26504034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Penalty weight tuning in high dose rate brachytherapy using multi-objective Bayesian optimization.
Jafarzadeh H; Antaki M; Mao X; Duclos M; Maleki F; Enger SA
Phys Med Biol; 2024 May; 69(11):. PubMed ID: 38670145
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
