1263 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32028898)
1. Framework for personalized prediction of treatment response in relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis.
Stühler E; Braune S; Lionetto F; Heer Y; Jules E; Westermann C; Bergmann A; van Hövell P;
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Feb; 20(1):24. PubMed ID: 32028898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Framework for personalized prediction of treatment response in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a replication study in independent data.
Sakr AM; Mansmann U; Havla J; Ön BI; Ön BI
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2024 Jun; 24(1):138. PubMed ID: 38914938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cost-utility of fingolimod compared with dimethyl fumarate in highly active relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) in England.
Maruszczak MJ; Montgomery SM; Griffiths MJ; Bergvall N; Adlard N
J Med Econ; 2015; 18(11):874-85. PubMed ID: 26055952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. No evidence of disease activity: indirect comparisons of oral therapies for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.
Nixon R; Bergvall N; Tomic D; Sfikas N; Cutter G; Giovannoni G
Adv Ther; 2014 Nov; 31(11):1134-54. PubMed ID: 25414048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Systematic literature review and network meta-analysis in highly active relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis and rapidly evolving severe multiple sclerosis.
Huisman E; Papadimitropoulou K; Jarrett J; Bending M; Firth Z; Allen F; Adlard N
BMJ Open; 2017 Mar; 7(3):e013430. PubMed ID: 28283486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Towards personalized therapy for multiple sclerosis: prediction of individual treatment response.
Kalincik T; Manouchehrinia A; Sobisek L; Jokubaitis V; Spelman T; Horakova D; Havrdova E; Trojano M; Izquierdo G; Lugaresi A; Girard M; Prat A; Duquette P; Grammond P; Sola P; Hupperts R; Grand'Maison F; Pucci E; Boz C; Alroughani R; Van Pesch V; Lechner-Scott J; Terzi M; Bergamaschi R; Iuliano G; Granella F; Spitaleri D; Shaygannejad V; Oreja-Guevara C; Slee M; Ampapa R; Verheul F; McCombe P; Olascoaga J; Amato MP; Vucic S; Hodgkinson S; Ramo-Tello C; Flechter S; Cristiano E; Rozsa C; Moore F; Luis Sanchez-Menoyo J; Laura Saladino M; Barnett M; Hillert J; Butzkueven H;
Brain; 2017 Sep; 140(9):2426-2443. PubMed ID: 29050389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative analysis of dimethyl fumarate and fingolimod in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.
Lorscheider J; Benkert P; Lienert C; Hänni P; Derfuss T; Kuhle J; Kappos L; Yaldizli Ö
J Neurol; 2021 Mar; 268(3):941-949. PubMed ID: 32974794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cost-effectiveness of delayed-release dimethyl fumarate for the treatment of relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis in the United States.
Mauskopf J; Fay M; Iyer R; Sarda S; Livingston T
J Med Econ; 2016; 19(4):432-42. PubMed ID: 26707273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Benefit-risk Assessment of Cladribine Using Multi-criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) for Patients With Relapsing-remitting Multiple Sclerosis.
Vermersch P; Martinelli V; Pfleger C; Rieckmann P; Alonso-Magdalena L; Galazka A; Dangond F; Phillips L
Clin Ther; 2019 Feb; 41(2):249-260.e18. PubMed ID: 30846120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Real-world effectiveness of fingolimod in Polish group of patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.
Walczak A; Kurkowska-Jastrzebska I; Zakrzewska-Pniewska B; Dorobek M; Brola W; Zajdel R; Bartosik-Psujek H; Stasiolek M; Kulakowska A; Rusek S; Tutaj A; Glabinski A; Wlodek A; Kochanowski J; Ciach A; Siger M; Kurowska K; Wicha W; Nojszewska M; Podlecka-Pietowska A; Czajka A; Kapica-Topczewska K; Bielecki B; Maciagowska-Terela M; Stepien A
Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2019 Sep; 184():105453. PubMed ID: 31376776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of fingolimod, dimethyl fumarate and teriflunomide for multiple sclerosis.
Kalincik T; Kubala Havrdova E; Horakova D; Izquierdo G; Prat A; Girard M; Duquette P; Grammond P; Onofrj M; Lugaresi A; Ozakbas S; Kappos L; Kuhle J; Terzi M; Lechner-Scott J; Boz C; Grand'Maison F; Prevost J; Sola P; Ferraro D; Granella F; Trojano M; Bergamaschi R; Pucci E; Turkoglu R; McCombe PA; Pesch VV; Van Wijmeersch B; Solaro C; Ramo-Tello C; Slee M; Alroughani R; Yamout B; Shaygannejad V; Spitaleri D; Sánchez-Menoyo JL; Ampapa R; Hodgkinson S; Karabudak R; Butler E; Vucic S; Jokubaitis V; Spelman T; Butzkueven H
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry; 2019 Apr; 90(4):458-468. PubMed ID: 30636699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Real-world disease-modifying therapy usage in persons with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: Cross-sectional data from the Swiss Multiple Sclerosis Registry.
Bossart J; Kamm CP; Kaufmann M; Stanikić M; Puhan MA; Kesselring J; Zecca C; Gobbi C; Rapold I; Kurmann R; Ammann S; von Wyl V;
Mult Scler Relat Disord; 2022 Apr; 60():103706. PubMed ID: 35228114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparing outcomes from clinical studies of oral disease-modifying therapies (dimethyl fumarate, fingolimod, and teriflunomide) in relapsing MS: Assessing absolute differences using a number needed to treat analysis.
Freedman MS; Montalban X; Miller AE; Dive-Pouletty C; Hass S; Thangavelu K; Leist TP
Mult Scler Relat Disord; 2016 Nov; 10():204-212. PubMed ID: 27919491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of efficacy and safety of oral agents for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.
Guarnera C; Bramanti P; Mazzon E
Drug Des Devel Ther; 2017; 11():2193-2207. PubMed ID: 28814828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Safety and efficacy of rituximab versus dimethyl fumarate in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis or clinically isolated syndrome in Sweden: a rater-blinded, phase 3, randomised controlled trial.
Svenningsson A; Frisell T; Burman J; Salzer J; Fink K; Hallberg S; Hambraeus J; Axelsson M; Nimer FA; Sundström P; Gunnarsson M; Johansson R; Mellergård J; Rosenstein I; Ayad A; Sjöblom I; Risedal A; de Flon P; Gilland E; Lindeberg J; Shawket F; Piehl F; Lycke J
Lancet Neurol; 2022 Aug; 21(8):693-703. PubMed ID: 35841908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cost-utility of First-line Disease-modifying Treatments for Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis.
Soini E; Joutseno J; Sumelahti ML
Clin Ther; 2017 Mar; 39(3):537-557.e10. PubMed ID: 28209373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cost-effectiveness of natalizumab vs fingolimod for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: analyses in Sweden.
O'Day K; Meyer K; Stafkey-Mailey D; Watson C
J Med Econ; 2015 Apr; 18(4):295-302. PubMed ID: 25422991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Real-life long-term effectiveness of fingolimod in Swiss patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.
Zecca C; Roth S; Findling O; Perriard G; Bachmann V; Pless ML; Baumann A; Kamm CP; Lalive PH; Czaplinski A
Eur J Neurol; 2018 May; 25(5):762-767. PubMed ID: 29431876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Real-World Outcomes in Fingolimod-Treated Patients with Multiple Sclerosis in the Czech Republic: Results from the 12-Month GOLEMS Study.
Tichá V; Kodým R; Počíková Z; Kadlecová P
Clin Drug Investig; 2017 Feb; 37(2):175-186. PubMed ID: 27785735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. When does economic model type become a decisive factor in health technology appraisals? Learning from the expanding treatment options for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.
Noon KM; Montgomery SM; Adlard NE; Kroes MA
J Med Econ; 2018 Oct; 21(10):983-992. PubMed ID: 29923439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
