These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32031103)

  • 1. Radiographic evaluation of bone density in dentulous and edentulous patients in Riyadh, KSA.
    Al-Attas MA; Koppolu P; Alanazi SA; Alduaji KT; Parameaswari PJ; Swapna LA; Almoallim H; Krishnan P
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2020 Feb; 23(2):258-265. PubMed ID: 32031103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Relationships between bone density values from cone beam computed tomography, maximum insertion torque, and resonance frequency analysis at implant placement: a pilot study.
    Fuster-Torres MÁ; Peñarrocha-Diago M; Peñarrocha-Oltra D; Peñarrocha-Diago M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):1051-6. PubMed ID: 22010089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Implant-guided volumetric analysis of edentulous maxillary bone with cone-beam computerized tomography scan. Maxillary sinus pneumatization classification.
    Tolstunov L; Thai D; Arellano L
    J Oral Implantol; 2012 Aug; 38(4):377-90. PubMed ID: 22913308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The reliability of cone-beam computed tomography to assess bone density at dental implant recipient sites: a histomorphometric analysis by micro-CT.
    González-García R; Monje F
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24(8):871-9. PubMed ID: 22250839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A deep learning approach for dental implant planning in cone-beam computed tomography images.
    Kurt Bayrakdar S; Orhan K; Bayrakdar IS; Bilgir E; Ezhov M; Gusarev M; Shumilov E
    BMC Med Imaging; 2021 May; 21(1):86. PubMed ID: 34011314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Histological and radiographic study of human edentulous and dentulous maxilla.
    Kamigaki Y; Sato I; Yosue T
    Anat Sci Int; 2017 Sep; 92(4):470-482. PubMed ID: 27067228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The evaluation of vertical heights of maxillary and mandibular bones and the location of anatomic landmarks in panoramic radiographs of edentulous patients for implant dentistry.
    Güler AU; Sumer M; Sumer P; Biçer I
    J Oral Rehabil; 2005 Oct; 32(10):741-6. PubMed ID: 16159352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sensitivity and specificity of radiographic methods for predicting insertion torque of dental implants.
    Cortes AR; Eimar H; Barbosa Jde S; Costa C; Arita ES; Tamimi F
    J Periodontol; 2015 May; 86(5):646-55. PubMed ID: 25594426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Anatomical characteristics and dimensions of edentulous sites in the posterior maxillae of patients referred for implant therapy.
    Nunes LS; Bornstein MM; Sendi P; Buser D
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2013; 33(3):337-45. PubMed ID: 23593627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The reliability of surgeons to avoid traumatic insertion of dental implants into high-risk regions: a panoramic radiograph study.
    Jamil FA; Mohammed JA; Hasan TA; Rzoqi MG
    BMC Oral Health; 2020 Apr; 20(1):96. PubMed ID: 32252728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Panoramic images versus three-dimensional planning software for oral implant planning in atrophied posterior maxillary: a clinical radiological study.
    Fortin T; Camby E; Alik M; Isidori M; Bouchet H
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2013 Apr; 15(2):198-204. PubMed ID: 21477064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Associations between the keratinized mucosa width and the underlying alveolar bone dimensions at partial edentulous molar sites: a retrospective cross-sectional study.
    Han Z; Wang C; Wei Y; Yang G; Hu W; Chung KH
    BMC Oral Health; 2024 Jul; 24(1):796. PubMed ID: 39010031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Changes in Bone Levels Around Mini-Implants in Edentulous Arches.
    Mundt T; Schwahn C; Biffar R; Heinemann F
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(5):1149-55. PubMed ID: 26394353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Measurement of Crestal Cortical Bone Thickness at Implant Site: A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Study.
    Gupta A; Rathee S; Agarwal J; Pachar RB
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Sep; 18(9):785-789. PubMed ID: 28874642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of facial and lingual cortical thicknesses in edentulous maxillary and mandibular sites measured on computerized tomograms.
    Flanagan D
    J Oral Implantol; 2008; 34(5):256-8. PubMed ID: 19170291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Three-dimensional evaluation of the cortical and cancellous bone density and thickness for miniscrew insertion: a CBCT study of interradicular area of adults with different facial growth pattern.
    Hasani M; Afzoon S; Karandish M; Parastar M
    BMC Oral Health; 2023 Oct; 23(1):753. PubMed ID: 37833666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessing Bone Type of Implant Recipient Sites by Stereomicroscopic Observation of Bone Core Specimens: A Comparison With the Assessment Using Dental Radiography.
    Fu MW; Shen EC; Fu E; Lin FG; Wang TY; Chiu HC
    J Periodontol; 2017 Jun; 88(6):593-601. PubMed ID: 28398151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mandible and maxilla bone mineral density and threshold analysis studies by pQCT in two edentulous women receiving pamidronate.
    Montangero VE; Capiglioni R; Roldán EJ
    Cranio; 2003 Apr; 21(2):110-5. PubMed ID: 12723856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The impact of CBCT imaging when placing dental implants in the anterior edentulous mandible: a before-after study.
    Shelley AM; Ferrero A; Brunton P; Goodwin M; Horner K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2015; 44(4):20140316. PubMed ID: 25472617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bone classification: an objective scale of bone density using the computerized tomography scan.
    Norton MR; Gamble C
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2001 Feb; 12(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 11168274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.