These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32031103)
21. The impact of CBCT imaging when placing dental implants in the anterior edentulous mandible: a before-after study. Shelley AM; Ferrero A; Brunton P; Goodwin M; Horner K Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2015; 44(4):20140316. PubMed ID: 25472617 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Bone classification: an objective scale of bone density using the computerized tomography scan. Norton MR; Gamble C Clin Oral Implants Res; 2001 Feb; 12(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 11168274 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Immediate and early loading of oxidized tapered implants in the partially edentulous maxilla: a 1-year prospective clinical, radiographic, and resonance frequency analysis study. Fischer K; Bäckström M; Sennerby L Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Jun; 11(2):69-80. PubMed ID: 18384399 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Evaluation of maxillary incisive canal characteristics related to dental implant treatment with computerized tomography: a clinical multicenter study. Tözüm TF; Güncü GN; Yıldırım YD; Yılmaz HG; Galindo-Moreno P; Velasco-Torres M; Al-Hezaimi K; Al-Sadhan R; Karabulut E; Wang HL J Periodontol; 2012 Mar; 83(3):337-43. PubMed ID: 21910596 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Using cone beam computed tomography to determine safe regions for implant placement. Sokhn S; Nasseh I; Noujeim M Gen Dent; 2011; 59(2):e72-7. PubMed ID: 21903512 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. One-step surgical placement of Brånemark implants: a prospective multicenter clinical study. Becker W; Becker BE; Israelson H; Lucchini JP; Handelsman M; Ammons W; Rosenberg E; Rose L; Tucker LM; Lekholm U Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(4):454-62. PubMed ID: 9274074 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Bone quality evaluation at dental implant site using multislice CT, micro-CT, and cone beam CT. Parsa A; Ibrahim N; Hassan B; van der Stelt P; Wismeijer D Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015; 26(1):e1-7. PubMed ID: 24325572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Three-dimensional measurement of bone loss at implants in patients with periodontal disease. Kehl M; Swierkot K; Mengel R J Periodontol; 2011 May; 82(5):689-99. PubMed ID: 21080785 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Analysis of the effect of mesial implant position on surrounding bone stress of mandibular edentulous jaw under dynamic loads]. Li Y; Sun C; Jia H; Luo XJ Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Nov; 52(11):672-677. PubMed ID: 29972946 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Morphology of the nasopalatine canal and dental implant surgery: a radiographic analysis of 100 consecutive patients using limited cone-beam computed tomography. Bornstein MM; Balsiger R; Sendi P; von Arx T Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Mar; 22(3):295-301. PubMed ID: 21039896 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Feasibility of implant placement in healed mandibular molar sites: A retrospective cone beam computed tomography study. He J; Liu Y; Lin Z; Li Y; Li C; Zhou L J Prosthet Dent; 2024 May; 131(5):904.e1-904.e10. PubMed ID: 38472073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison of digital panoramic radiography versus cone beam computerized tomography for measuring alveolar bone. Tang Z; Liu X; Chen K Head Face Med; 2017 Feb; 13(1):2. PubMed ID: 28228135 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of Cone-beam Computed Tomography and Multi-slice Spiral Computed Tomography Bone Density Measurements in the Maxilla and Mandible. Doyle S; Wiltz MJ; Kraut RA N Y State Dent J; 2015; 81(4):42-5. PubMed ID: 26373034 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. To Assess and Evaluate the Variation of Mandibular Anatomy Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography Before Planning an Implant Surgery: A Population-based Retrospective Study. Kapoor V; Kumar N; Dahiya K; Sikka R; Sirana P; Singh A J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Nov; 19(11):1381-1385. PubMed ID: 30602645 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Clinical bone densitometric evaluation of the mandible in removable denture wearers dependent on the morphology of the mandibular cortex. Zlatarić DK; Celebić A J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Jul; 90(1):86-91. PubMed ID: 12869976 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Relative bone width of the edentulous maxillary ridge. Clinical implications of digital assessment in presurgical implant planning. Katsoulis J; Enkling N; Takeichi T; Urban IA; Mericske-Stern R; Avrampou M Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 May; 14 Suppl 1():e213-23. PubMed ID: 22375945 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Distribution of bone quality in patients receiving endosseous dental implants. Truhlar RS; Orenstein IH; Morris HF; Ochi S J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1997 Dec; 55(12 Suppl 5):38-45. PubMed ID: 9393425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Evaluation of the contour of edentulous jaw sections in the transversal plane and the buccolingual vertical-level disparity in CBCT and panoramic radiography images: a retrospective comparative study. Ketabi AR; Piwowarczyk A; Schulz MC; Lauer HC; Hassfeld S Int J Implant Dent; 2023 Jan; 9(1):1. PubMed ID: 36595148 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Anatomy of the mandibular canal and surrounding structures. Part II: Cancellous pattern of the mandible. Iwanaga J; Shiromoto K; Kato T; Tanaka T; Ibaragi S; Tubbs RS Ann Anat; 2020 Nov; 232():151583. PubMed ID: 32810613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison of two-dimensional orthoradially reformatted computed tomography and panoramic radiography for dental implant treatment planning. Lam EW; Ruprecht A; Yang J J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Jul; 74(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 7674189 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]