BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3203127)

  • 1. On the properties of maximum likelihood estimators of familial correlations under variable sibship size.
    Wette R; McGue MK; Rao DC; Cloninger CR
    Biometrics; 1988 Sep; 44(3):717-25. PubMed ID: 3203127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Properties of alternative estimators of familial correlations under variable sibship size.
    Vogler GP; Wette R; McGue MK; Rao DC
    Biometrics; 1995 Mar; 51(1):276-83. PubMed ID: 7766782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of recent estimators of interclass correlation from familial data.
    Eliasziw M; Donner A
    Biometrics; 1990 Jun; 46(2):391-8. PubMed ID: 2364129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The estimation of intraclass correlation in the analysis of family data.
    Donner A; Koval JJ
    Biometrics; 1980 Mar; 36(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 7370372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Monte Carlo evaluation of three statistical methods used in path analysis.
    McGue M; Wette R; Rao DC
    Genet Epidemiol; 1987; 4(2):129-55. PubMed ID: 3582958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Variance-component estimation from human sibship data.
    Donner A; Koval JJ
    Biometrics; 1983 Sep; 39(3):599-605. PubMed ID: 6652196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Random-effects meta-analysis of correlations: Monte Carlo evaluation of mean estimators.
    Hafdahl AR
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2010 Feb; 63(Pt 1):227-54. PubMed ID: 19527563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Eight interval estimators of a common rate ratio under stratified Poisson sampling.
    Lui KJ
    Stat Med; 2004 Apr; 23(8):1283-96. PubMed ID: 15083483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bivariate familial correlation analysis of quantitative traits by use of estimating equations: application to a familial analysis of the insulin resistance syndrome.
    Trégouët DA; Herbeth B; Juhan-Vague I; Siest G; Ducimetière P; Tiret L
    Genet Epidemiol; 1999; 16(1):69-83. PubMed ID: 9915568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Testing hypotheses about interclass correlations from familial data.
    Konishi S
    Biometrics; 1985 Mar; 41(1):167-76. PubMed ID: 4005373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Nonrandom sampling in genetic epidemiology: maximum likelihood methods for multifactorial analysis of quantitative data ascertained through truncation.
    Rao DC; Wette R
    Genet Epidemiol; 1987; 4(5):357-76. PubMed ID: 3319764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of heterogeneity variance estimators in combining results of studies.
    Sidik K; Jonkman JN
    Stat Med; 2007 Apr; 26(9):1964-81. PubMed ID: 16955539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interval estimation of the proportion ratio under multiple matching.
    Lui KJ
    Stat Med; 2005 Apr; 24(8):1275-85. PubMed ID: 15565736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Interval estimation of risk ratio in the simple compliance randomized trial.
    Lui KJ
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2007 Feb; 28(2):120-9. PubMed ID: 16820329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bias reduction for multiple-recapture estimators of closed population size.
    Evans MA; Bonett DG
    Biometrics; 1994 Jun; 50(2):388-95. PubMed ID: 8068839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interval estimation of the difference in proportions under m-to-one matching.
    Lui KJ
    Stat Med; 2005 Jun; 24(11):1765-76. PubMed ID: 15736281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Nonrandom sampling in genetic epidemiology: an implementation of the Hanis-Chakraborty method for multifactorial analysis.
    Rao DC; Wette R
    Genet Epidemiol; 1989; 6(3):461-70. PubMed ID: 2753354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Variance and confidence limits in validation studies based on comparison between three different types of measurements.
    Ferrari P; Kaaks R; Riboli E
    J Epidemiol Biostat; 2000; 5(5):303-13. PubMed ID: 11142606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multiple comparisons for analyzing dichotomous response.
    Piegorsch WW
    Biometrics; 1991 Mar; 47(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 2049512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bias in misspecified mixtures.
    Gray G
    Biometrics; 1994 Jun; 50(2):457-70. PubMed ID: 8068845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.