These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3203133)
1. Estimating the power of the two-sample Wilcoxon test for location shift. Collings BJ; Hamilton MA Biometrics; 1988 Sep; 44(3):847-60. PubMed ID: 3203133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The use of bootstrap methods for estimating sample size and analysing health-related quality of life outcomes. Walters SJ; Campbell MJ Stat Med; 2005 Apr; 24(7):1075-102. PubMed ID: 15570625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Power and sample size calculations for discrete bounded outcome scores. Tsonaka R; Rizopoulos D; Lesaffre E Stat Med; 2006 Dec; 25(24):4241-52. PubMed ID: 16947202 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A general approach for sample size and statistical power calculations assessing of interventions using a mixture model in the presence of detection limits. Nie L; Chu H; Cole SR Contemp Clin Trials; 2006 Oct; 27(5):483-91. PubMed ID: 16769254 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The appropriateness of the Wilcoxon test in ordinal data. Hilton JF Stat Med; 1996 Mar; 15(6):631-45. PubMed ID: 8731005 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Joint propagation of variability and imprecision in assessing the risk of groundwater contamination. Baudrit C; Guyonnet D; Dubois D J Contam Hydrol; 2007 Aug; 93(1-4):72-84. PubMed ID: 17321003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Power comparison of robust approximate and non-parametric tests for the analysis of cross-over trials. Correa JA; Bellavance F Stat Med; 2001 Apr; 20(8):1185-96. PubMed ID: 11304735 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of recent methods for the analysis of small-sample cross-over studies. Chen X; Wei L Stat Med; 2003 Sep; 22(18):2821-33. PubMed ID: 12953282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accurate estimation of the density of states from Monte Carlo transition probability data. Fenwick MK J Chem Phys; 2006 Oct; 125(14):144905. PubMed ID: 17042648 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Monte Carlo method for calculating Bayesian uncertainties in internal dosimetry. Puncher M; Birchall A Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 132(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 18806256 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. On sample size of the kruskal-wallis test with application to a mouse peritoneal cavity study. Fan C; Zhang D; Zhang CH Biometrics; 2011 Mar; 67(1):213-24. PubMed ID: 20345499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Testing the ratio of two poisson rates. Gu K; Ng HK; Tang ML; Schucany WR Biom J; 2008 Apr; 50(2):283-98. PubMed ID: 18311854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quantile-function based null distribution in resampling based multiple testing. van der Laan MJ; Hubbard AE Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2006; 5():Article14. PubMed ID: 17049025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Approximate sample size formulas for the two-sample trimmed mean test with unequal variances. Luh WM; Guo JH Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2007 May; 60(Pt 1):137-46. PubMed ID: 17535584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Power calculations for preclinical studies using a K-sample rank test and the Lehmann alternative hypothesis. Heller G Stat Med; 2006 Aug; 25(15):2543-53. PubMed ID: 16025543 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Uncertainties in personal dosimetry for external radiation: a Monte Carlo approach. van Dijk JW Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 121(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 17052989 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bootstrapping the estimated latent distribution of the two-parameter latent trait model. Knott M; Tzamourani P Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2007 May; 60(Pt 1):175-91. PubMed ID: 17535586 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Circumventing multiple testing: a multilocus Monte Carlo approach to testing for association. McIntyre LM; Martin ER; Simonsen KL; Kaplan NL Genet Epidemiol; 2000 Jul; 19(1):18-29. PubMed ID: 10861894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of methods for intermediate fine mapping. Papachristou C; Lin S Genet Epidemiol; 2006 Dec; 30(8):677-89. PubMed ID: 16917817 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bootstrap tests for overdispersion in a zero-inflated Poisson regression model. Jung BC; Jhun M; Lee JW Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):626-8; discussion 628-9. PubMed ID: 16011713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]