281 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32031685)
1. Downgrading of grade group 2 intermediate-risk prostate cancer from biopsy to radical prostatectomy: Comparison of outcomes and predictors to identify potential candidates for active surveillance.
Su ZT; Patel HD; Epstein JI; Pavlovich CP; Allaf ME
Cancer; 2020 Apr; 126(8):1632-1639. PubMed ID: 32031685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluating the Safety of Active Surveillance: Outcomes of Deferred Radical Prostatectomy after an Initial Period of Surveillance.
Balakrishnan AS; Cowan JE; Cooperberg MR; Shinohara K; Nguyen HG; Carroll PR
J Urol; 2019 Sep; 202(3):506-510. PubMed ID: 30958738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The prognostic value of high-grade prostate cancer pattern on MRI-targeted biopsies: predictors for downgrading and importance of concomitant systematic biopsies.
Manceau C; Fromont-Hankard G; Beauval JB; Lesourd M; Almeras C; Bajeot AS; Gautier JR; Soulié M; Loison G; Salin A; Tollon C; Malavaud B; Roumiguié M; Ploussard G
World J Urol; 2021 Sep; 39(9):3315-3321. PubMed ID: 33609168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Grade Group Underestimation in Prostate Biopsy: Predictive Factors and Outcomes in Candidates for Active Surveillance.
Audenet F; Rozet F; Resche-Rigon M; Bernard R; Ingels A; Prapotnich D; Sanchez-Salas R; Galiano M; Barret E; Cathelineau X
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2017 Dec; 15(6):e907-e913. PubMed ID: 28522288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Outcomes of Grade Group 2 and 3 Prostate Cancer on Initial Versus Confirmatory Biopsy: Implications for Active Surveillance.
Perera M; Jibara G; Tin AL; Haywood S; Sjoberg DD; Benfante NE; Carlsson SV; Eastham JA; Laudone V; Touijer KA; Fine S; Scardino PT; Vickers AJ; Ehdaie B
Eur Urol Focus; 2023 Jul; 9(4):662-668. PubMed ID: 36566100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Combined multiple clinical characteristics for prediction of discordance in grade and stage in prostate cancer patients undergoing systematic biopsy and radical prostatectomy.
Liu H; Tang K; Xia D; Peng E; Wang L; Chen Z
Pathol Res Pract; 2020 Nov; 216(11):153235. PubMed ID: 33035728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluating the Outcomes of Active Surveillance in Grade Group 2 Prostate Cancer: Prospective Results from the Canary PASS Cohort.
Waisman Malaret AJ; Chang P; Zhu K; Zheng Y; Newcomb LF; Liu M; McKenney JK; Brooks JD; Carroll P; Dash A; Filson CP; Gleave ME; Liss M; Martin FM; Morgan TM; Nelson PS; Lin DW; Wagner AA
J Urol; 2022 Apr; 207(4):805-813. PubMed ID: 34854745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of Pathological and Oncologic Outcomes of Favorable Risk Gleason Score 3 + 4 and Low Risk Gleason Score 6 Prostate Cancer: Considerations for Active Surveillance.
Gearman DJ; Morlacco A; Cheville JC; Rangel LJ; Karnes RJ
J Urol; 2018 May; 199(5):1188-1195. PubMed ID: 29225057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pathological upgrading at radical prostatectomy for patients with Grade Group 1 prostate cancer: implications of confirmatory testing for patients considering active surveillance.
Kaye DR; Qi J; Morgan TM; Linsell S; Ginsburg KB; Lane BR; Montie JE; Cher ML; Miller DC;
BJU Int; 2019 May; 123(5):846-853. PubMed ID: 30248225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Percentage Gleason pattern 4 and PI-RADS score predict upgrading in biopsy Grade Group 2 prostate cancer patients without cribriform pattern.
van der Slot MA; Seyrek N; Kweldam CF; den Bakker MA; Busstra MB; Gan M; Klaver S; Rietbergen JBW; van Leenders GJLH
World J Urol; 2022 Nov; 40(11):2723-2729. PubMed ID: 36190529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A novel nomogram to identify candidates for active surveillance amongst patients with International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Grade Group (GG) 1 or ISUP GG2 prostate cancer, according to multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging findings.
Luzzago S; de Cobelli O; Cozzi G; Peveri G; Bagnardi V; Catellani M; Di Trapani E; Mistretta FA; Pricolo P; Conti A; Alessi S; Marvaso G; Ferro M; Matei DV; Renne G; Jereczek-Fossa BA; Petralia G; Musi G
BJU Int; 2020 Jul; 126(1):104-113. PubMed ID: 32150328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Adverse Pathologic Findings for Men Electing Immediate Radical Prostatectomy: Defining a Favorable Intermediate-Risk Group.
Patel HD; Tosoian JJ; Carter HB; Epstein JI
JAMA Oncol; 2018 Jan; 4(1):89-92. PubMed ID: 28715578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical role of pathological downgrading after radical prostatectomy in patients with biopsy confirmed Gleason score 3 + 4 prostate cancer.
Gondo T; Poon BY; Matsumoto K; Bernstein M; Sjoberg DD; Eastham JA
BJU Int; 2015 Jan; 115(1):81-6. PubMed ID: 24725760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Immediate versus delayed radical prostatectomy: updated outcomes following active surveillance of prostate cancer.
Filippou P; Welty CJ; Cowan JE; Perez N; Shinohara K; Carroll PR
Eur Urol; 2015 Sep; 68(3):458-63. PubMed ID: 26138041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Downgrading from Biopsy Grade Group 4 Prostate Cancer in Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy for High or Very High Risk Prostate Cancer.
Ranasinghe W; Reichard CA; Nyame YA; Sundi D; Tosoian JJ; Wilkins L; Alam R; Achim MF; Wang X; Stephenson AJ; Klein EA; Ross AE; Allaf ME; Davis JW; Chapin BF
J Urol; 2020 Oct; 204(4):748-753. PubMed ID: 32259468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Radiologist-like artificial intelligence for grade group prediction of radical prostatectomy for reducing upgrading and downgrading from biopsy.
Shao L; Yan Y; Liu Z; Ye X; Xia H; Zhu X; Zhang Y; Zhang Z; Chen H; He W; Liu C; Lu M; Huang Y; Ma L; Sun K; Zhou X; Yang G; Lu J; Tian J
Theranostics; 2020; 10(22):10200-10212. PubMed ID: 32929343
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Questioning the Status Quo: Should Gleason Grade Group 1 Prostate Cancer be Considered a "Negative Core" in Pre-Radical Prostatectomy Risk Nomograms? An International Multicenter Analysis.
Leong JY; Herrera-Caceres JO; Goldberg H; Tham E; Teplitsky S; Gomella LG; Trabulsi EJ; Lallas CD; Fleshner NE; Tilki D; Chandrasekar T
Urology; 2020 Mar; 137():102-107. PubMed ID: 31705947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Subtyping the Risk of Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer for Active Surveillance Based on Adverse Pathology at Radical Prostatectomy.
Patel HD; Gupta M; Tosoian JJ; Carter HB; Partin AW; Epstein JI
J Urol; 2018 Nov; 200(5):1068-1074. PubMed ID: 29673946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prediction of pathological stage based on clinical stage, serum prostate-specific antigen, and biopsy Gleason score: Partin Tables in the contemporary era.
Tosoian JJ; Chappidi M; Feng Z; Humphreys EB; Han M; Pavlovich CP; Epstein JI; Partin AW; Trock BJ
BJU Int; 2017 May; 119(5):676-683. PubMed ID: 27367645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Natural History of Untreated Biopsy Grade Group Progression and Delayed Definitive Treatment for Men on Active Surveillance for Early-Stage Prostate Cancer.
Chappidi MR; Bell A; Cowan JE; Greenberg SA; Lonergan PE; Washington SL; Nguyen HG; Shinohara K; Cooperberg MR; Carroll PR
J Urol; 2022 May; 207(5):1001-1009. PubMed ID: 34981949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
