163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32032221)
1. The Merits of Bilateral Application of Bone-Conduction Devices in Children With Bilateral Conductive Hearing Loss.
den Besten CA; Vogt K; Bosman AJ; Snik AFM; Hol MKS; Agterberg MJH
Ear Hear; 2020; 41(5):1327-1332. PubMed ID: 32032221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bilateral adhesive bone conduction devices in patients with congenital bilateral conductive hearing loss.
Liu Y; Wang Y; Yang L; Zhu J; Wang D; Zhao S
Am J Otolaryngol; 2023; 44(4):103923. PubMed ID: 37167858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Improved directional hearing of children with congenital unilateral conductive hearing loss implanted with an active bone-conduction implant or an active middle ear implant.
Vogt K; Frenzel H; Ausili SA; Hollfelder D; Wollenberg B; Snik AFM; Agterberg MJH
Hear Res; 2018 Dec; 370():238-247. PubMed ID: 30174182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bilateral bone conduction devices: improved hearing ability in children with bilateral conductive hearing loss.
Dun CA; Agterberg MJ; Cremers CW; Hol MK; Snik AF
Ear Hear; 2013; 34(6):806-8. PubMed ID: 23698625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sound localization with bilateral bone conduction devices.
Caspers CJI; Janssen AM; Agterberg MJH; Cremers CWRJ; Hol MKS; Bosman AJ
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2022 Apr; 279(4):1751-1764. PubMed ID: 33956208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Bilateral bone conduction stimulation provides reliable binaural cues for localization.
Snapp H; Vogt K; Agterberg MJH
Hear Res; 2020 Mar; 388():107881. PubMed ID: 31945691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Differing Bilateral Benefits for Spatial Release From Masking and Sound Localization Accuracy Using Bone Conduction Devices.
Denanto FM; Wales J; Tideholm B; Asp F
Ear Hear; 2022 Nov-Dec 01; 43(6):1708-1720. PubMed ID: 35588503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Contribution of spectral pinna cues for sound localization in children with congenital unilateral conductive hearing loss after hearing rehabilitation.
Vogt K; Wasmann JW; Van Opstal AJ; Snik AFM; Agterberg MJH
Hear Res; 2020 Jan; 385():107847. PubMed ID: 31786443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bilateral cochlear implants in children: localization acuity measured with minimum audible angle.
Litovsky RY; Johnstone PM; Godar S; Agrawal S; Parkinson A; Peters R; Lake J
Ear Hear; 2006 Feb; 27(1):43-59. PubMed ID: 16446564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sound Localization and Lateralization by Bilateral Bone Conduction Devices, Middle Ear Implants, and Cartilage Conduction Hearing Aids.
Shiraishi K
Audiol Res; 2021 Sep; 11(4):508-523. PubMed ID: 34698075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Implantable Devices for Single-Sided Deafness and Conductive or Mixed Hearing Loss: A Health Technology Assessment.
Ontario Health (Quality)
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2020; 20(1):1-165. PubMed ID: 32194878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Contribution of monaural and binaural cues to sound localization in listeners with acquired unilateral conductive hearing loss: improved directional hearing with a bone-conduction device.
Agterberg MJ; Snik AF; Hol MK; Van Wanrooij MM; Van Opstal AJ
Hear Res; 2012 Apr; 286(1-2):9-18. PubMed ID: 22616091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Spatial hearing and speech intelligibility in bilateral cochlear implant users.
Litovsky RY; Parkinson A; Arcaroli J
Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):419-31. PubMed ID: 19455039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Three-year experience with the Sophono in children with congenital conductive unilateral hearing loss: tolerability, audiometry, and sound localization compared to a bone-anchored hearing aid.
Nelissen RC; Agterberg MJ; Hol MK; Snik AF
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Oct; 273(10):3149-56. PubMed ID: 26924741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sound-localization performance of patients with single-sided deafness is not improved when listening with a bone-conduction device.
Agterberg MJH; Snik AFM; Van de Goor RMG; Hol MKS; Van Opstal AJ
Hear Res; 2019 Feb; 372():62-68. PubMed ID: 29703651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sound Localization and Speech Perception in Noise of Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients: Bimodal Fitting Versus Bilateral Cochlear Implants.
Choi JE; Moon IJ; Kim EY; Park HS; Kim BK; Chung WH; Cho YS; Brown CJ; Hong SH
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(4):426-440. PubMed ID: 28085740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Lateralization of interimplant timing and level differences in children who use bilateral cochlear implants.
Salloum CA; Valero J; Wong DD; Papsin BC; van Hoesel R; Gordon KA
Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):441-56. PubMed ID: 20489647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. How to quantify binaural hearing in patients with unilateral hearing using hearing implants.
Snik A; Agterberg M; Bosman A
Audiol Neurootol; 2015; 20 Suppl 1():44-7. PubMed ID: 25997479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sound localization in noise by normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implant users.
Kerber S; Seeber BU
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(4):445-57. PubMed ID: 22588270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. BAHA in children and adolescents with unilateral or bilateral conductive hearing loss: a study of outcome.
Priwin C; Jönsson R; Hultcrantz M; Granström G
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2007 Jan; 71(1):135-45. PubMed ID: 17092570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
