These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3203259)

  • 61. Nurses unified against RCT threat.
    Calif Nurse; 1989 Jan; 85(1):10. PubMed ID: 2910372
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Nurses unite against AMA proposal.
    Boisvert SV
    Maine Nurse; 1988; 74(4):9. PubMed ID: 3172848
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. AMA proposal: questions and answers.
    Pelican News; 1988 Aug; 44(4):3, 5. PubMed ID: 3419869
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Nurses fight AMA proposal.
    Calif Nurse; 1988; 84(6):1. PubMed ID: 3401811
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Nurses oppose AMA proposal for minimally trained technologists.
    S D Nurse; 1988 Aug; 30(3):4-5. PubMed ID: 3175677
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. ANA House opposes AMA caregiver proposal.
    Selby TL
    Am Nurse; 1988; 20(7):1. PubMed ID: 3415078
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. From the President. AMA registered care technologist proposal.
    Lonsway RA
    J Intraven Nurs; 1988; 11(6):363-4. PubMed ID: 3204444
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. AAOHN position statement and action proposal. The registered care technologist.
    AAOHN J; 1989 Feb; 37(2):82-3. PubMed ID: 2914033
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. ANA House of Delegates votes to fight AMA proposal.
    N J Nurse; 1988; 18(4):1, 11. PubMed ID: 3412877
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Registered care technologists: the AMA proposal.
    Neonatal Netw; 1988 Aug; 7(1):7-9. PubMed ID: 3405192
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Nurses oppose AMA proposal for minimally trained RCT's.
    Joel LA
    Bull Tenn Nurses Assoc; 1988 Aug; 51(4):1, 3. PubMed ID: 3409439
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. AMA proposal calling for new categories of licensed care givers.
    Nev Rnformation; 1988; ():10-1. PubMed ID: 3412536
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Nurses oppose AMA proposal for minimally trained technologists.
    Joel LA
    Nebr Nurse; 1988 Aug; 21(3):7-8. PubMed ID: 3412534
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Bay Area districts give facts on the RCT issue to their peers and the public.
    Tittle MB; Walker W
    Fla Nurse; 1989 Feb; 37(2):19. PubMed ID: 2703087
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. NHNA Position Paper on the AMA proposal to create registered care technologists.
    Nurs News; 1988 Aug; 39(4):12. PubMed ID: 3412916
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. North Carolina Nurses Association Position Statement: response to AMA proposal for registered care technologists.
    Tar Heel Nurse; 1988; 50(4):3-4. PubMed ID: 3175919
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Debate over Registered Care Technologists: nurses angry, opposed to AMA proposal.
    Tex Nurs; 1988; 62(6):6, 8. PubMed ID: 3413700
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Basic care-givers American style. Statement on the proper use of assistive personnel to the registered nurse.
    N Z Nurs J; 1991 Feb; 84(1):15. PubMed ID: 1997911
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Impact of the RCT proposal on specialty nursing practice.
    Weinstein SM
    J Intraven Nurs; 1989; 12(4):233-6. PubMed ID: 2754519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. RCTs: not the answer to the nursing shortage.
    Frels LM; Straub LA; Goldsteen RL
    Nurs Econ; 1989; 7(3):136-41. PubMed ID: 2761648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.