These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32032984)

  • 1. Estimation of nonlinear water-quality trends in high-frequency monitoring data.
    Yang G; Moyer DL
    Sci Total Environ; 2020 May; 715():136686. PubMed ID: 32032984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Statistical assessment of nonpoint source pollution in agricultural watersheds in the Lower Grand River watershed, MO, USA.
    Jabbar FK; Grote K
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Jan; 26(2):1487-1506. PubMed ID: 30430446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Long-term trends and probability distributions of river water quality variables and their relationships with climate elasticity characteristics.
    Khan AU; Wang P; Jiang J; Shi B
    Environ Monit Assess; 2018 Oct; 190(11):648. PubMed ID: 30338394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Surrogate measures for providing high frequency estimates of total phosphorus concentrations in urban watersheds.
    Viviano G; Salerno F; Manfredi EC; Polesello S; Valsecchi S; Tartari G
    Water Res; 2014 Nov; 64():265-277. PubMed ID: 25076012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sensors in the Stream: The High-Frequency Wave of the Present.
    Rode M; Wade AJ; Cohen MJ; Hensley RT; Bowes MJ; Kirchner JW; Arhonditsis GB; Jordan P; Kronvang B; Halliday SJ; Skeffington RA; Rozemeijer JC; Aubert AH; Rinke K; Jomaa S
    Environ Sci Technol; 2016 Oct; 50(19):10297-10307. PubMed ID: 27570873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A simulation-based approach to assess the power of trend detection in high- and low-frequency water quality records.
    Liu S; Guo D; Webb JA; Wilson PJ; Western AW
    Environ Monit Assess; 2020 Sep; 192(10):628. PubMed ID: 32902735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Water quality monitoring with purpose: Using a novel framework and leveraging long-term data.
    da Luz N; Tobiason JE; Kumpel E
    Sci Total Environ; 2022 Apr; 818():151729. PubMed ID: 34801499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Spatio-temporal dynamics of water quality and their linkages with the watershed landscape in highly disturbed headwater watersheds in China.
    Zhang W; Chen D; Li H
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2018 Dec; 25(35):35287-35300. PubMed ID: 30341757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Spatial and temporal relationships among watershed mining, water quality, and freshwater mussel status in an eastern USA river.
    Zipper CE; Donovan PF; Jones JW; Li J; Price JE; Stewart RE
    Sci Total Environ; 2016 Jan; 541():603-615. PubMed ID: 26437340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multi-scale trend analysis of water quality using error propagation of generalized additive models.
    Beck MW; de Valpine P; Murphy R; Wren I; Chelsky A; Foley M; Senn DB
    Sci Total Environ; 2022 Jan; 802():149927. PubMed ID: 34474297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Modeling water quality in an urban river using hydrological factors--data driven approaches.
    Chang FJ; Tsai YH; Chen PA; Coynel A; Vachaud G
    J Environ Manage; 2015 Mar; 151():87-96. PubMed ID: 25544251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The impact of the congestion charging scheme on air quality in London. Part 1. Emissions modeling and analysis of air pollution measurements.
    Kelly F; Anderson HR; Armstrong B; Atkinson R; Barratt B; Beevers S; Derwent D; Green D; Mudway I; Wilkinson P;
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2011 Apr; (155):5-71. PubMed ID: 21830496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Driver detection of water quality trends in three large European river basins.
    Diamantini E; Lutz SR; Mallucci S; Majone B; Merz R; Bellin A
    Sci Total Environ; 2018 Jan; 612():49-62. PubMed ID: 28846904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Water-quality trends in US rivers: Exploring effects from streamflow trends and changes in watershed management.
    Murphy J; Sprague L
    Sci Total Environ; 2019 Mar; 656():645-658. PubMed ID: 30529968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reconstructing Missing and Anomalous Data Collected from High-Frequency In-Situ Sensors in Fresh Waters.
    Kermorvant C; Liquet B; Litt G; Jones JB; Mengersen K; Peterson EE; Hyndman RJ; Leigh C
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Dec; 18(23):. PubMed ID: 34886529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of violations in water quality standards in the monitoring network of São Francisco River basin, the third largest in Brazil.
    da Costa EP; Pinto CC; Soares ALC; Melo LDV; Oliveira SMAC
    Environ Monit Assess; 2017 Oct; 189(11):590. PubMed ID: 29086029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Analysis of the Trend and Seasonal Cycle of Carbon Monoxide Concentrations in an Urban Area (4 pp).
    Heinrich A
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2007 Jan; 14 Suppl 1():19-22. PubMed ID: 21959536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Applications of turbidity monitoring to forest management in California.
    Harris RR; Sullivan K; Cafferata PH; Munn JR; Faucher KM
    Environ Manage; 2007 Sep; 40(3):531-43. PubMed ID: 17562100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of the 1990 Hong Kong legislation for restriction on sulfur content in fuel.
    Wong CM; Rabl A; Thach TQ; Chau YK; Chan KP; Cowling BJ; Lai HK; Lam TH; McGhee SM; Anderson HR; Hedley AJ
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2012 Aug; (170):5-91. PubMed ID: 23316618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Multi-scale analysis of oxygen demand trends in an urbanizing Oregon watershed, USA.
    Boeder M; Chang H
    J Environ Manage; 2008 Jun; 87(4):567-81. PubMed ID: 18201815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.