135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32033073)
1. Analysing Standard Progressive Matrices (SPM-LS) with Bayesian Item Response Models.
Bürkner PC
J Intell; 2020 Feb; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 32033073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A Mokken Scale Analysis of the Last Series of the Standard Progressive Matrices (SPM-LS).
Myszkowski N
J Intell; 2020 May; 8(2):. PubMed ID: 32384666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A Psychometric Analysis of Raven's Colored Progressive Matrices: Evaluating Guessing and Carelessness Using the 4PL Item Response Theory Model.
Antoniou F; Alkhadim G; Mouzaki A; Simos P
J Intell; 2022 Jan; 10(1):. PubMed ID: 35225922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A Bayesian Robust IRT Outlier-Detection Model.
Öztürk NK; Karabatsos G
Appl Psychol Meas; 2017 May; 41(3):195-208. PubMed ID: 29881088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Exploration and analysis of a generalized one-parameter item response model with flexible link functions.
Wang X; Zhang J; Lu J; Cheng G; Shi N
Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1248454. PubMed ID: 37711320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Regularized Latent Class Analysis for Polytomous Item Responses: An Application to SPM-LS Data.
Robitzsch A
J Intell; 2020 Aug; 8(3):. PubMed ID: 32823949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Using the Stan Program for Bayesian Item Response Theory.
Luo Y; Jiao H
Educ Psychol Meas; 2018 Jun; 78(3):384-408. PubMed ID: 30140099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Searching for G: A New Evaluation of SPM-LS Dimensionality.
Garcia-Garzon E; Abad FJ; Garrido LE
J Intell; 2019 Jun; 7(3):. PubMed ID: 31261787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. IRTBEMM: An R Package for Estimating IRT Models With Guessing or Slipping Parameters.
Guo S; Zheng C; Kern JL
Appl Psychol Meas; 2020 Oct; 44(7-8):566-567. PubMed ID: 34565936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessing the Accuracy of Parameter Estimates in the Presence of Rapid Guessing Misclassifications.
Rios JA
Educ Psychol Meas; 2022 Feb; 82(1):122-150. PubMed ID: 34992309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. On the Statistical and Practical Limitations of Thurstonian IRT Models.
Bürkner PC; Schulte N; Holling H
Educ Psychol Meas; 2019 Oct; 79(5):827-854. PubMed ID: 31488915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Validation of the Italian Remote Associate Test.
Salvi C; Costantini G; Pace A; Palmiero M
J Creat Behav; 2020 Mar; 54(1):62-74. PubMed ID: 32728265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Metacognitive Awareness Scale, Domain Specific (MCAS-DS): Assessing Metacognitive Awareness During Raven's Progressive Matrices.
Song JHH; Loyal S; Lond B
Front Psychol; 2020; 11():607577. PubMed ID: 33488467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Modeling Sequential Dependencies in Progressive Matrices: An Auto-Regressive Item Response Theory (AR-IRT) Approach.
Myszkowski N; Storme M
J Intell; 2024 Jan; 12(1):. PubMed ID: 38248905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Robustness of the performance of the optimized hierarchical two-parameter logistic IRT model for small-sample item calibration.
König C; Spoden C; Frey A
Behav Res Methods; 2023 Dec; 55(8):3965-3983. PubMed ID: 36333627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Age-stratified norms for Raven's standard progressive matrices for Sri Lankan adults.
Dassanayake TL; Ariyasinghe DI; Baminiwatta A; Hewawasam C
Clin Neuropsychol; 2024 Jun; ():1-15. PubMed ID: 38937886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Detection of malingering through the use of raven's standard progressive matrices.
Andrade C; Tharakan JF; Chari S
Indian J Psychiatry; 2001 Jan; 43(1):36-40. PubMed ID: 21407836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Scoring Depression on a Common Metric: A Comparison of EAP Estimation, Plausible Value Imputation, and Full Bayesian IRT Modeling.
Fischer HF; Rose M
Multivariate Behav Res; 2019; 54(1):85-99. PubMed ID: 30235003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A Bayesian Random Block Item Response Theory Model for Forced-Choice Formats.
Lee H; Smith WZ
Educ Psychol Meas; 2020 Jun; 80(3):578-603. PubMed ID: 32425220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Benefits of the Curious Behavior of Bayesian Hierarchical Item Response Theory Models-An in-Depth Investigation and Bias Correction.
König C; Alexandrowicz RW
Appl Psychol Meas; 2024 Mar; 48(1-2):38-56. PubMed ID: 38327609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
