BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32033610)

  • 1. Luteal phase stimulation versus follicular phase stimulation in poor ovarian responders: results of a randomized controlled trial.
    Llácer J; Moliner B; Luque L; Bernabéu A; Lledó B; Castillo JC; Guerrero J; Ten J; Bernabéu R
    Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2020 Feb; 18(1):9. PubMed ID: 32033610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Luteal Phase Ovarian Stimulation May Improve Oocyte Retrieval and Oocyte Quality in Poor Ovarian Responders Undergoing In Vitro Fertilization: Preliminary Results from a Single-Center Prospective Pilot Study.
    Lin LT; Vitale SG; Chen SN; Wen ZH; Tsai HW; Chern CU; Tsui KH
    Adv Ther; 2018 Jun; 35(6):847-856. PubMed ID: 29869107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Luteal Phase Ovarian Stimulation versus Follicular Phase Ovarian Stimulation results in different Human Cumulus cell genes expression: A pilot study.
    Chen YC; Li JY; Li CJ; Tsui KH; Wang PH; Wen ZH; Lin LT
    Int J Med Sci; 2021; 18(7):1600-1608. PubMed ID: 33746576
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of the Second Follicular Wave Phenomenon in Natural Cycle Assisted Reproduction: A Key Option for Poor Responders through Luteal Phase Oocyte Retrieval.
    Sfakianoudis K; Simopoulou M; Maziotis E; Giannelou P; Tsioulou P; Rapani A; Pantou A; Petroutsou K; Angeli I; Deligeoroglou E; Koutsilieris M; Pantos K
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2019 Mar; 55(3):. PubMed ID: 30875815
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of luteal phase stimulation with follicular phase stimulation in poor ovarian response: a single-blinded randomized controlled trial.
    Dastjerdi MV; Ansaripour S; Ataei M; Gharedaghi R; Hoseini SMM; Mohazzab A; Zafardoust S
    Contracept Reprod Med; 2024 Feb; 9(1):6. PubMed ID: 38368372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Luteal-phase ovarian stimulation is a feasible method for poor ovarian responders undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection-embryo transfer treatment compared to a GnRH antagonist protocol: A retrospective study.
    Wei LH; Ma WH; Tang N; Wei JH
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Feb; 55(1):50-4. PubMed ID: 26927248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Follicular versus luteal phase ovarian stimulation during the same menstrual cycle (DuoStim) in a reduced ovarian reserve population results in a similar euploid blastocyst formation rate: new insight in ovarian reserve exploitation.
    Ubaldi FM; Capalbo A; Vaiarelli A; Cimadomo D; Colamaria S; Alviggi C; Trabucco E; Venturella R; Vajta G; Rienzi L
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Jun; 105(6):1488-1495.e1. PubMed ID: 27020168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Double stimulations during the follicular and luteal phases of poor responders in IVF/ICSI programmes (Shanghai protocol).
    Kuang Y; Chen Q; Hong Q; Lyu Q; Ai A; Fu Y; Shoham Z
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2014 Dec; 29(6):684-91. PubMed ID: 25444501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Luteal phase anovulatory follicles result in the production of competent oocytes: intra-patient paired case-control study comparing follicular versus luteal phase stimulations in the same ovarian cycle.
    Cimadomo D; Vaiarelli A; Colamaria S; Trabucco E; Alviggi C; Venturella R; Alviggi E; Carmelo R; Rienzi L; Ubaldi FM
    Hum Reprod; 2018 Aug; 33(8):1442-1448. PubMed ID: 29912374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Luteal phase ovarian stimulation for poor ovarian responders.
    Zhang W; Wang M; Wang S; Bao H; Qu Q; Zhang N; Hao C
    JBRA Assist Reprod; 2018 Sep; 22(3):193-198. PubMed ID: 29931967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ovarian stimulation in the luteal phase: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Boots CE; Meister M; Cooper AR; Hardi A; Jungheim ES
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2016 Aug; 33(8):971-80. PubMed ID: 27146151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Corifollitropin alfa followed by highly purified HMG versus recombinant FSH in young poor ovarian responders: a multicentre randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Drakopoulos P; Vuong TNL; Ho NAV; Vaiarelli A; Ho MT; Blockeel C; Camus M; Lam AT; van de Vijver A; Humaidan P; Tournaye H; Polyzos NP
    Hum Reprod; 2017 Nov; 32(11):2225-2233. PubMed ID: 29040589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessing the practice of LuPOR for poor responders: a prospective study evaluating follicular fluid cfDNA levels during natural IVF cycles.
    Sfakianoudis K; Tsioulou P; Maziotis E; Giannelou P; Glava A; Grigoriadis S; Rapani A; Nezos A; Pantou A; Koutsilieris M; Pantos K; Mastorakos G; Simopoulou M
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2020 May; 37(5):1183-1194. PubMed ID: 32221790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How effective are the non-conventional ovarian stimulation protocols in ART? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Glujovsky D; Pesce R; Miguens M; Sueldo CE; Lattes K; Ciapponi A
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2020 Dec; 37(12):2913-2928. PubMed ID: 33219862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Luteal phase ovarian stimulation following oocyte retrieval: is it helpful for poor responders?
    Zhang J
    Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2015 Jul; 13():76. PubMed ID: 26209449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Flexibility in starting ovarian stimulation at different phases of the menstrual cycle for treatment of infertile women with the use of in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection.
    Qin N; Chen Q; Hong Q; Cai R; Gao H; Wang Y; Sun L; Zhang S; Guo H; Fu Y; Ai A; Tian H; Lyu Q; Daya S; Kuang Y
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Aug; 106(2):334-341.e1. PubMed ID: 27114329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison between follicular stimulation and luteal stimulation protocols with clomiphene and HMG in women with poor ovarian response.
    Li Y; Yang W; Chen X; Li L; Zhang Q; Yang D
    Gynecol Endocrinol; 2016; 32(1):74-7. PubMed ID: 26370530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. DuoStim cycles potentially boost reproductive outcomes in poor prognosis patients.
    Cecchino GN; Roque M; Cerrillo M; Filho RDR; Chiamba FDS; Hatty JH; García-Velasco JA
    Gynecol Endocrinol; 2021 Jun; 37(6):519-522. PubMed ID: 32954881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Initiation of ovarian stimulation independent of the menstrual cycle: a case-control study.
    Buendgen NK; Schultze-Mosgau A; Cordes T; Diedrich K; Griesinger G
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2013 Oct; 288(4):901-4. PubMed ID: 23545834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Luteal phase after conventional stimulation in the same ovarian cycle might improve the management of poor responder patients fulfilling the Bologna criteria: a case series.
    Vaiarelli A; Cimadomo D; Conforti A; Schimberni M; Giuliani M; D'Alessandro P; Colamaria S; Alviggi C; Rienzi L; Ubaldi FM
    Fertil Steril; 2020 Jan; 113(1):121-130. PubMed ID: 31837743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.