These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32033692)

  • 1. Perceptions of key stakeholders on procedural justice in the Consent And Capacity Board of Ontario's hearings.
    Paul S; Nakhost A; Stergiopoulos V; Matheson FI; Simpson AIF; Guimond T
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2020; 68():101515. PubMed ID: 32033692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Capacity to Consent to Treatment of Substance Use Disorders at Ontario's Consent and Capacity Board: A Review of Past Reported Decisions.
    Hauck TS; Goud R; Warner M; Franchuk S; Zaheer J; Stergiopoulos V; Tang VM; Buckley L
    Can J Psychiatry; 2024 Jun; ():7067437241261488. PubMed ID: 38872386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. What medical school did you graduate from? Judicial prescribing of medical treatments.
    Miller RD
    J Psychiatry Law; 2000; 28(2):215-33. PubMed ID: 12546011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Toward a pure best interests model of proxy decision making for incompetent psychiatric patients.
    McCubbin M; Weisstub DN
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 1998; 21(1):1-30. PubMed ID: 9526712
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Treatment delays for involuntary psychiatric patients associated with reviews of treatment capacity.
    Kelly M; Dunbar S; Gray JE; O'Reilly RL
    Can J Psychiatry; 2002 Mar; 47(2):181-5. PubMed ID: 11926081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Supreme court of Canada's "Beautiful Mind" case.
    Gray JE; O'Reilly RL
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2009; 32(5):315-22. PubMed ID: 19643478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Connecticut Experience with
    Norko MA; Cotterell MS; Hollis T
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2020 Dec; 48(4):473-483. PubMed ID: 32675332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Consent and capacity in psychiatric practice revisited.
    McClelland R; Szmukler G
    Eur J Health Law; 2000 Mar; 7(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 12542025
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The retreat from Gillick.
    Douglas G
    Mod Law Rev; 1992 Jul; 55(4):569-76. PubMed ID: 16977738
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The capacity to refuse psychiatric treatment: a guide to the law for clinicians and tribunal members.
    Ryan C; Callaghan S; Peisah C
    Aust N Z J Psychiatry; 2015 Apr; 49(4):324-33. PubMed ID: 25690742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. "Everything has been tried and his heart can't recover…": A Descriptive Review of "Do Everything!" in the Archive of Ontario Consent and Capacity Board.
    Yim H; Hashmi SS; Dewar B; Dyason C; Kyeremanteng K; Lamb S; Shamy M
    BMC Med Ethics; 2022 Jun; 23(1):66. PubMed ID: 35761229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Image of psychiatric patients' competency to give informed consent to treatment in Japan. I. A factor analytic study.
    Kitamura T; Kitamura F; Mitsuhashi T; Ito A; Okazaki Y; Okuda N; Katoh H
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 1999; 22(1):45-54. PubMed ID: 10086290
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Old law meets new medicine: revisiting involuntary psychotropic medication of the criminal defendant.
    Siegel DM; Grudzinskas AJ; Pinals DA
    Wis L Rev; 2001; 2():307-80. PubMed ID: 16281337
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Substituted judgement and the right to refuse shock treatment in Washington: In re Schuoler.
    Marshall GS
    Univ Puget Sound Law Rev; 1987; 11(1):167-92. PubMed ID: 16998979
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Consent and the mentally disordered detained patient.
    Dimond B
    Br J Nurs; 2003 Dec 11-2004 Jan 7; 12(22):1331-4. PubMed ID: 14688654
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Exploring experiences with compulsory psychiatric community treatment: A qualitative multi-perspective pilot study in an urban Canadian context.
    Francombe Pridham K; Nakhost A; Tugg L; Etherington N; Stergiopoulos V; Law S
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2018; 57():122-130. PubMed ID: 29548499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ontario's new law of consent to treatment: potential for liability.
    Campbell CL
    Leadersh Health Serv; 1995; 4(4):9-11. PubMed ID: 10144383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Medicating committed psychiatric patients over their objections: balancing patients' interests and quality of mental health care.
    Hacker G
    Rutgers Law J; 1983; 14(3):685-739. PubMed ID: 11658759
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Procedural justice in the context of civil commitment: an analogue study.
    Cascardi M; Poythress NG; Hall A
    Behav Sci Law; 2000; 18(6):731-40. PubMed ID: 11180419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Capacity of forensic patients to consent to research: the use of the MacCAT-CR.
    McDermott BE; Gerbasi JB; Quanbeck C; Scott CL
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2005; 33(3):299-307. PubMed ID: 16186191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.