171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32033909)
1. The Significance of Primary Biopsy Gleason 5 in Patients with Grade Group 5 Prostate Cancer.
Tilki D; Würnschimmel C; Preisser F; Graefen M; Huland H; Mandel P; Tennstedt P
Eur Urol Focus; 2020 Mar; 6(2):255-258. PubMed ID: 32033909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Primary Gleason grade 4 at the positive margin is associated with metastasis and death among patients with Gleason 7 prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy.
Viers BR; Sukov WR; Gettman MT; Rangel LJ; Bergstralh EJ; Frank I; Tollefson MK; Thompson RH; Boorjian SA; Karnes RJ
Eur Urol; 2014 Dec; 66(6):1116-24. PubMed ID: 25052213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The New Prostate Cancer Grading System Does Not Improve Prediction of Clinical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy: Results of a Large, Two-Center Validation Study.
Dell'Oglio P; Karnes RJ; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Stabile A; Moschini M; Cucchiara V; Zaffuto E; Karakiewicz PI; Suardi N; Montorsi F; Briganti A
Prostate; 2017 Feb; 77(3):263-273. PubMed ID: 27753114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. New Prostate Cancer Grading System Predicts Long-term Survival Following Surgery for Gleason Score 8-10 Prostate Cancer.
Ham WS; Chalfin HJ; Feng Z; Trock BJ; Epstein JI; Cheung C; Humphreys E; Partin AW; Han M
Eur Urol; 2017 Jun; 71(6):907-912. PubMed ID: 27876305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Differential prognostic impact of different Gleason patterns in grade group 4 in radical prostatectomy specimens.
Mori K; Sharma V; Comperat EM; Sato S; Laukhtina E; Schuettfort VM; Pradere B; Parizi MK; Karakiewicz PI; Egawa S; Tilki D; Boorjian SA; Shariat SF
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2021 May; 47(5):1172-1178. PubMed ID: 33371950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Natural History of Clinical Recurrence Patterns of Lymph Node-Positive Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy.
Moschini M; Sharma V; Zattoni F; Quevedo JF; Davis BJ; Kwon E; Karnes RJ
Eur Urol; 2016 Jan; 69(1):135-42. PubMed ID: 25865061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pattern of Biopsy Gleason Grade Group 5 (4 + 5 vs 5 + 4 vs 5 + 5) Predicts Survival After Radical Prostatectomy or External Beam Radiation Therapy.
Wenzel M; Würnschimmel C; Chierigo F; Mori K; Tian Z; Terrone C; Shariat SF; Saad F; Tilki D; Graefen M; Mandel P; Roos FC; Chun FKH; Karakiewicz PI
Eur Urol Focus; 2022 May; 8(3):710-717. PubMed ID: 33933420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Impact of Downgrading from Biopsy Gleason 7 to Prostatectomy Gleason 6 on Biochemical Recurrence and Prostate Cancer Specific Mortality.
Ham WS; Chalfin HJ; Feng Z; Trock BJ; Epstein JI; Cheung C; Humphreys E; Partin AW; Han M
J Urol; 2017 Apr; 197(4):1060-1067. PubMed ID: 27847296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of Initial Gleason Grade on Outcomes during Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer.
Masic S; Cowan JE; Washington SL; Nguyen HG; Shinohara K; Cooperberg MR; Carroll PR
Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Oct; 1(5):386-394. PubMed ID: 31158077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Radical prostatectomy represents an effective treatment in patients with specimen-confined high pathological Gleason score prostate cancer.
Lughezzani G; Gallina A; Larcher A; Briganti A; Capitanio U; Suardi N; Lista G; Abrate A; Sangalli MN; Buffi N; Cestari A; Guazzoni G; Rigatti P; Montorsi F
BJU Int; 2013 May; 111(5):723-30. PubMed ID: 22487441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Role of Prostate-specific Antigen Persistence After Radical Prostatectomy for the Prediction of Clinical Progression and Cancer-specific Mortality in Node-positive Prostate Cancer Patients.
Bianchi L; Nini A; Bianchi M; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Suardi N; Moschini M; Dell'Oglio P; Schiavina R; Montorsi F; Briganti A
Eur Urol; 2016 Jun; 69(6):1142-8. PubMed ID: 26749093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biopsy Detected Gleason Pattern 5 is Associated with Recurrence, Metastasis and Mortality in a Cohort of Men with High Risk Prostate Cancer.
Stroup SP; Moreira DM; Chen Z; Howard L; Berger JH; Terris MK; Aronson WJ; Cooperberg MR; Amling CL; Kane CJ; Freedland SJ
J Urol; 2017 Dec; 198(6):1309-1315. PubMed ID: 28709888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validation of the 2015 prostate cancer grade groups for predicting long-term oncologic outcomes in a shared equal-access health system.
Schulman AA; Howard LE; Tay KJ; Tsivian E; Sze C; Amling CL; Aronson WJ; Cooperberg MR; Kane CJ; Terris MK; Freedland SJ; Polascik TJ
Cancer; 2017 Nov; 123(21):4122-4129. PubMed ID: 28662291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prostate-only Versus Whole-pelvis Radiation with or Without a Brachytherapy Boost for Gleason Grade Group 5 Prostate Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis.
Sandler KA; Cook RR; Ciezki JP; Ross AE; Pomerantz MM; Nguyen PL; Shaikh T; Tran PT; Stock RG; Merrick GS; Demanes DJ; Spratt DE; Abu-Isa EI; Wedde TB; Lilleby W; Krauss DJ; Shaw GK; Alam R; Reddy CA; Song DY; Klein EA; Stephenson AJ; Tosoian JJ; Hegde JV; Yoo SM; Fiano R; D'Amico AV; Nickols NG; Aronson WJ; Sadeghi A; Greco SC; Deville C; McNutt T; DeWeese TL; Reiter RE; Said JW; Steinberg ML; Horwitz EM; Kupelian PA; King CR; Kishan AU
Eur Urol; 2020 Jan; 77(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 30992160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prognostic Significance of Percentage and Architectural Types of Contemporary Gleason Pattern 4 Prostate Cancer in Radical Prostatectomy.
Choy B; Pearce SM; Anderson BB; Shalhav AL; Zagaja G; Eggener SE; Paner GP
Am J Surg Pathol; 2016 Oct; 40(10):1400-6. PubMed ID: 27379821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Optimization of the 2014 Gleason grade grouping in a Canadian cohort of patients with localized prostate cancer.
Wissing M; Brimo F; Chevalier S; Scarlata E; McKercher G; O'Flaherty A; Aprikian S; Thibodeau V; Saad F; Carmel M; Lacombe L; Têtu B; Ekindi-Ndongo N; Latour M; Trudel D; Aprikian A
BJU Int; 2019 Apr; 123(4):624-631. PubMed ID: 30113732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Outcomes of very high-risk prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy: Validation study from 3 centers.
Sundi D; Tosoian JJ; Nyame YA; Alam R; Achim M; Reichard CA; Li J; Wilkins L; Schwen Z; Han M; Davis JW; Klein EA; Schaeffer EM; Stephenson AJ; Ross AE; Chapin BF
Cancer; 2019 Feb; 125(3):391-397. PubMed ID: 30423193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Predictive value of the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology grading system for prostate cancer in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy with long-term follow-up.
Grogan J; Gupta R; Mahon KL; Stricker PD; Haynes AM; Delprado W; Turner J; Horvath LG; Kench JG
BJU Int; 2017 Nov; 120(5):651-658. PubMed ID: 28371244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comedonecrosis Gleason pattern 5 is associated with worse clinical outcome in operated prostate cancer patients.
Hansum T; Hollemans E; Verhoef EI; Bangma CH; Rietbergen J; Osanto S; Pelger RCM; van Wezel T; van der Poel H; Bekers E; Helleman J; Remmers S; van Leenders GJLH
Mod Pathol; 2021 Nov; 34(11):2064-2070. PubMed ID: 34175896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Predictors of biochemical recurrence after Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Analysis of 359 cases with a median follow-up period of 26 months.
Abdel Raheem A; Chang KD; Alenzi MJ; Ham WS; Han WK; Choi YD; Rha KH
Int J Urol; 2018 Dec; 25(12):1006-1014. PubMed ID: 30276864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
