These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

258 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32034546)

  • 1. Crestal bone response to loaded zirconia and titanium implants: a radiographic and histometric analysis in canines.
    Oeschger CE; Bosshardt DD; Roehling S; Gahlert M; Cochran DL; Janner SFM
    Clin Oral Investig; 2020 Oct; 24(10):3609-3617. PubMed ID: 32034546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bone response to functionally loaded, two-piece zirconia implants: A preclinical histometric study.
    Janner SFM; Gahlert M; Bosshardt DD; Roehling S; Milz S; Higginbottom F; Buser D; Cochran DL
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Mar; 29(3):277-289. PubMed ID: 29288505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ligature-Induced Peri-implant Bone Loss Around Loaded Zirconia and Titanium Implants.
    Roehling S; Gahlert M; Janner S; Meng B; Woelfler H; Cochran DL
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(2):357–365. PubMed ID: 30716147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of a machined collar on crestal bone changes around titanium implants: a histometric study in the canine mandible.
    Hermann JS; Jones AA; Bakaeen LG; Buser D; Schoolfield JD; Cochran DL
    J Periodontol; 2011 Sep; 82(9):1329-38. PubMed ID: 21486176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Osseointegration of one-piece zirconia implants compared with a titanium implant of identical design: a histomorphometric study in the dog.
    Koch FP; Weng D; Krämer S; Biesterfeld S; Jahn-Eimermacher A; Wagner W
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Mar; 21(3):350-6. PubMed ID: 20074240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of the size of the microgap on crestal bone changes around titanium implants. A histometric evaluation of unloaded non-submerged implants in the canine mandible.
    Hermann JS; Schoolfield JD; Schenk RK; Buser D; Cochran DL
    J Periodontol; 2001 Oct; 72(10):1372-83. PubMed ID: 11699479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Histological analysis of loaded zirconia and titanium dental implants: an experimental study in the dog mandible.
    Thoma DS; Benic GI; Muñoz F; Kohal R; Sanz Martin I; Cantalapiedra AG; Hämmerle CH; Jung RE
    J Clin Periodontol; 2015 Oct; 42(10):967-75. PubMed ID: 26362505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Crestal bone changes around titanium implants. A histometric evaluation of unloaded non-submerged and submerged implants in the canine mandible.
    Hermann JS; Buser D; Schenk RK; Cochran DL
    J Periodontol; 2000 Sep; 71(9):1412-24. PubMed ID: 11022770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Marginal bone-level alterations of loaded zirconia and titanium dental implants: an experimental study in the dog mandible.
    Thoma DS; Benic GI; Muñoz F; Kohal R; Sanz Martin I; Cantalapiedra AG; Hämmerle CH; Jung RE
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Apr; 27(4):412-20. PubMed ID: 25864523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Histological, radiological and histomorphometric evaluation of immediate vs. non-immediate loading of a zirconia implant with surface treatment in a dog model.
    Calvo-Guirado JL; Aguilar-Salvatierra A; Gomez-Moreno G; Guardia J; Delgado-Ruiz RA; Mate-Sanchez de Val JE
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Jul; 25(7):826-30. PubMed ID: 23551427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of the size of the microgap on crestal bone levels in non-submerged dental implants: a radiographic study in the canine mandible.
    King GN; Hermann JS; Schoolfield JD; Buser D; Cochran DL
    J Periodontol; 2002 Oct; 73(10):1111-7. PubMed ID: 12416767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Tissue integration of zirconia and titanium implants with and without buccal dehiscence defects-A histologic and radiographic preclinical study.
    Thoma DS; Lim HC; Paeng KW; Jung UW; Hämmerle CHF; Jung RE
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2019 Jul; 30(7):660-669. PubMed ID: 31038788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Crestal bone changes around titanium implants: a methodologic study comparing linear radiographic with histometric measurements.
    Hermann JS; Schoolfield JD; Nummikoski PV; Buser D; Schenk RK; Cochran DL
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(4):475-85. PubMed ID: 11515994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of an endosseous titanium implant with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface in the canine mandible: radiographic results.
    Cochran DL; Nummikoski PV; Higginbottom FL; Hermann JS; Makins SR; Buser D
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 1996 Sep; 7(3):240-52. PubMed ID: 9151588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. One-piece zirconia oral implants: one-year results from a prospective case series. 2. Three-unit fixed dental prosthesis (FDP) reconstruction.
    Kohal RJ; Patzelt SB; Butz F; Sahlin H
    J Clin Periodontol; 2013 May; 40(5):553-62. PubMed ID: 23506654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Early loading of nonsubmerged titanium implants with a chemically modified sand-blasted and acid-etched surface: 6-month results of a prospective case series study in the posterior mandible focusing on peri-implant crestal bone changes and implant stability quotient (ISQ) values.
    Bornstein MM; Hart CN; Halbritter SA; Morton D; Buser D
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Dec; 11(4):338-47. PubMed ID: 19438966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biomechanical investigation of thread designs and interface conditions of zirconia and titanium dental implants with bone: three-dimensional numeric analysis.
    Fuh LJ; Hsu JT; Huang HL; Chen MY; Shen YW
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(2):e64-71. PubMed ID: 23527370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Three-year analysis of zirconia implants used for single-tooth replacement and three-unit fixed dental prostheses: A prospective multicenter study.
    Balmer M; Spies BC; Vach K; Kohal RJ; Hämmerle CHF; Jung RE
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Mar; 29(3):290-299. PubMed ID: 29330869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Osseointegration of titanium, titanium alloy and zirconia dental implants: current knowledge and open questions.
    Bosshardt DD; Chappuis V; Buser D
    Periodontol 2000; 2017 Feb; 73(1):22-40. PubMed ID: 28000277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of zirconia and titanium implants after a short healing period. A pilot study in minipigs.
    Stadlinger B; Hennig M; Eckelt U; Kuhlisch E; Mai R
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Jun; 39(6):585-92. PubMed ID: 20172693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.