BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32035323)

  • 21. Discourse coherence modulates use of predictive processing during sentence comprehension.
    Carter GA; Hoffman P
    Cognition; 2024 Jan; 242():105637. PubMed ID: 37857052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Minimal Overlap in Language Control Across Production And Comprehension: Evidence from Read-Aloud Versus Eye-Tracking Tasks.
    Ahn D; Abbott MJ; Rayner K; Ferreira VS; Gollan TH
    J Neurolinguistics; 2020 May; 54():. PubMed ID: 32189830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Pure-list production improves item recognition and sometimes also improves source memory.
    Bodner GE; Huff MJ; Taikh A
    Mem Cognit; 2020 Oct; 48(7):1281-1294. PubMed ID: 32399916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effects of contrastive focus on lexical predictability during sentence reading: The case of
    Lowder MW; Ryan G; Opie J; Kaminsky E
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2021 Jan; 74(1):179-186. PubMed ID: 32705949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Sleep-dependent consolidation in children with comprehension and vocabulary weaknesses: it'll be alright on the night?
    James E; Gaskell MG; Henderson LM
    J Child Psychol Psychiatry; 2020 Oct; 61(10):1104-1115. PubMed ID: 32367542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Lexical Stress and Linguistic Predictability Influence Proofreading Behavior.
    Harris LN; Perfetti CA
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():96. PubMed ID: 26903904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Encouraging prediction during production facilitates subsequent comprehension: Evidence from interleaved object naming in sentence context and sentence reading.
    Hintz F; Meyer AS; Huettig F
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(6):1056-63. PubMed ID: 26652170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Downstream Behavioral and Electrophysiological Consequences of Word Prediction on Recognition Memory.
    Hubbard RJ; Rommers J; Jacobs CL; Federmeier KD
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2019; 13():291. PubMed ID: 31555111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Applicability of the Compensatory Encoding Model in Foreign Language Reading: An Investigation with Chinese College English Language Learners.
    Han F
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():681. PubMed ID: 28522984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The production effect in long-list recall: In no particular order?
    Lambert AM; Bodner GE; Taikh A
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2016 Jun; 70(2):165-76. PubMed ID: 27244358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Predicting memory benefits in the production effect: the use and misuse of self-generated distinctive cues when making judgments of learning.
    Castel AD; Rhodes MG; Friedman MC
    Mem Cognit; 2013 Jan; 41(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 22915315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comprehension exposures to words in sentence contexts impact spoken word production.
    Francis WS; Gurrola BV; Martínez M
    Mem Cognit; 2022 Jan; 50(1):192-215. PubMed ID: 34453287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Extrinsic Cognitive Load Impairs Spoken Word Recognition in High- and Low-Predictability Sentences.
    Hunter CR; Pisoni DB
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(2):378-389. PubMed ID: 28945658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Reading in the dark: effects of age and contrast on reading speed and comprehension.
    Mitzner TL; Rogers WA
    Hum Factors; 2006; 48(2):229-40. PubMed ID: 16884045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The effect of word predictability on reading time is logarithmic.
    Smith NJ; Levy R
    Cognition; 2013 Sep; 128(3):302-19. PubMed ID: 23747651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Production improves recognition and reduces intrusions in between-subject designs: An updated meta-analysis.
    Fawcett JM; Baldwin MM; Whitridge JW; Swab M; Malayang K; Hiscock B; Drakes DH; Willoughby HV
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2023 Mar; 77(1):35-44. PubMed ID: 36521123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Characterizing production: the production effect is eliminated for unusual voices unless they are frequent at study.
    Wakeham-Lewis RM; Ozubko J; Fawcett JM
    Memory; 2022 Nov; 30(10):1319-1333. PubMed ID: 36107805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. To predict or not to predict: age-related differences in the use of sentential context.
    Wlotko EW; Federmeier KD; Kutas M
    Psychol Aging; 2012 Dec; 27(4):975-88. PubMed ID: 22775363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Time for prediction? The effect of presentation rate on predictive sentence comprehension during word-by-word reading.
    Wlotko EW; Federmeier KD
    Cortex; 2015 Jul; 68():20-32. PubMed ID: 25987437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Patients with Mild Alzheimer's Disease Fail When Using Their Working Memory: Evidence from the Eye Tracking Technique.
    Fernández G; Manes F; Politi LE; Orozco D; Schumacher M; Castro L; Agamennoni O; Rotstein NP
    J Alzheimers Dis; 2016; 50(3):827-38. PubMed ID: 26836011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.