These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32035323)

  • 41. Individual differences in children's memory and reading comprehension: an investigation of semantic and inhibitory deficits.
    Cain K
    Memory; 2006 Jul; 14(5):553-69. PubMed ID: 16754241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. A further look at ageing and word predictability effects in Chinese reading: Evidence from one-character words.
    Zhao S; Li L; Chang M; Wang J; Paterson KB
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2021 Jan; 74(1):68-76. PubMed ID: 32749198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Production benefits learning: the production effect endures and improves memory for text.
    Ozubko JD; Hourihan KL; MacLeod CM
    Memory; 2012; 20(7):717-27. PubMed ID: 22827717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Production on hold: delaying vocal production enhances the production effect in free recall.
    Mama Y; Icht M
    Memory; 2018 May; 26(5):589-602. PubMed ID: 28974150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Semantic involvement in reading aloud: evidence from a nonword training study.
    McKay A; Davis C; Savage G; Castles A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Nov; 34(6):1495-517. PubMed ID: 18980410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. WORD MEANING BLINDNESS REVISITED.
    Lambon MA; Ellis RAW; Sage K
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 1998 Jun; 15(4):389-400. PubMed ID: 28657507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Eye movement control in reading: word predictability has little influence on initial landing positions in words.
    Rayner K; Binder KS; Ashby J; Pollatsek A
    Vision Res; 2001 Mar; 41(7):943-54. PubMed ID: 11248279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Robust effects of predictability across experimental contexts: Evidence from event-related potentials.
    Zhang W; Chow WY; Liang B; Wang S
    Neuropsychologia; 2019 Nov; 134():107229. PubMed ID: 31610184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The Effect of Syntactic Impairment on Errors in Reading Aloud: Text Reading and Comprehension of Deaf and Hard of Hearing Children.
    Szterman R; Friedmann N
    Brain Sci; 2020 Nov; 10(11):. PubMed ID: 33238465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. This time it's personal: the memory benefit of hearing oneself.
    Forrin ND; MacLeod CM
    Memory; 2018 Apr; 26(4):574-579. PubMed ID: 28969489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The activation of contextually predictable words in syntactically illegal positions.
    Cutter MG; Martin AE; Sturt P
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 Sep; 73(9):1423-1430. PubMed ID: 32075497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Evaluating the basis of the between-group production effect in recognition.
    Taikh A; Bodner GE
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2016 Jun; 70(2):186-94. PubMed ID: 27244360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Confusion between silent and overt reading in schizophrenia.
    Franck N; Rouby P; Daprati E; Daléry J; Marie-Cardine M; Georgieff N
    Schizophr Res; 2000 Jan; 41(2):357-64. PubMed ID: 10708345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Direct versus indirect tests of memory: directed forgetting meets the generation effect.
    MacLeod CM; Daniels KA
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2000 Jun; 7(2):354-9. PubMed ID: 10909145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Large-scale evidence for logarithmic effects of word predictability on reading time.
    Shain C; Meister C; Pimentel T; Cotterell R; Levy R
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2024 Mar; 121(10):e2307876121. PubMed ID: 38422017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Readers accurately monitor their incidental word learning success during silent reading.
    Upadhyay SSN; Brusnighan SM; Folk JR
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2022 Aug; 228():103653. PubMed ID: 35777309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The production effect: delineation of a phenomenon.
    MacLeod CM; Gopie N; Hourihan KL; Neary KR; Ozubko JD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 May; 36(3):671-85. PubMed ID: 20438265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Different language control mechanisms in comprehension and production: Evidence from paragraph reading.
    Li C; Midgley KJ; Ferreira VS; Holcomb PJ; Gollan TH
    Brain Lang; 2024 Jan; 248():105367. PubMed ID: 38113600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. A computational account of the production effect: Still playing twenty questions with nature.
    Jamieson RK; Mewhort DJ; Hockley WE
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2016 Jun; 70(2):154-64. PubMed ID: 27244357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The effect of decay and lexical uncertainty on processing long-distance dependencies in reading.
    Stone K; von der Malsburg T; Vasishth S
    PeerJ; 2020; 8():e10438. PubMed ID: 33362963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.