134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32035816)
1. What is the most reliable radiographic method to evaluate the longitudinal foot arch? Application in subjects with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.
Mjaess G; Karam A; Labaki C; Karam M; Bakouny Z; Ghanimeh J; Saliby RM; Bizdikian AJ; Ghanem I; Assi A
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2020 Nov; 106(7):1263-1268. PubMed ID: 32035816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reproducibility of radiographic methods for assessing longitudinal tarsal axes: Part 1: Consecutive case study.
Kido M; Ikoma K; Ikeda R; Hosokawa T; Hara Y; Imai K; Maki M; Ohashi S; Mikami Y; Kubo T
Foot (Edinb); 2019 Sep; 40():1-7. PubMed ID: 30978533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. CURRENT LINES AND ANGLES USED IN PAEDIATRIC FOOT RADIOGRAPH: A SCOPING REVIEW OF LITERATURE.
Doski J
Ann Ib Postgrad Med; 2024 Apr; 22(1):51-61. PubMed ID: 38939887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fully automated determination of arch angle on weight-bearing foot radiograph.
Kao EF; Lu CY; Wang CY; Yeh WC; Hsia PK
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Feb; 154():79-88. PubMed ID: 29249349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Alterations of 3D acetabular and lower limb parameters in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
Karam M; Bizdikian AJ; Khalil N; Bakouny Z; Obeid I; Ghanimeh J; Labaki C; Mjaess G; Karam A; Skalli W; Kharrat K; Ghanem I; Assi A
Eur Spine J; 2020 Aug; 29(8):2010-2017. PubMed ID: 32246232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessing 3D paediatric foot morphology using low-dose biplanar radiography: Parameter reproducibility and preliminary values.
Rampal V; Rohan PY; Saksik R; Wicart P; Skalli W
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2018 Nov; 104(7):1083-1089. PubMed ID: 30253989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of the medial longitudinal arch: a comparison between the dynamic plantar pressure measurement system and radiographic analysis.
Yalçin N; Esen E; Kanatli U; Yetkin H
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2010; 44(3):241-5. PubMed ID: 21088466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reproducibility of radiographic methods for assessing longitudinal tarsal axes Part 2: Severe cavus or flatfoot study.
Kido M; Ikoma K; Ikeda R; Hosokawa T; Hara Y; Imai K; Maki M; Ohashi S; Mikami Y; Kubo T
Foot (Edinb); 2020 Mar; 42():101631. PubMed ID: 31810028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Tibialis posterior transfer for foot drop due to central causes: Long-term hindfoot alignment.
Sturbois-Nachef N; Allart E; Grauwin MY; Rousseaux M; Thévenon A; Fontaine C
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2019 Feb; 105(1):153-158. PubMed ID: 30591416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Calcaneal Z Lengthening Osteotomy Combined With Subtalar Arthroereisis for Severe Adolescent Flexible Flatfoot Reconstruction.
Xu Y; Li XC; Xu XY
Foot Ankle Int; 2016 Nov; 37(11):1225-1231. PubMed ID: 27402620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative Evaluation of Radiographic Parameters of Foot Pronation in Two Different Conditions versus Barefoot.
Anselmo DS; Skolnik J; Keeter E; El-Sayed AM; Love E
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 2018 Jul; 108(4):285-291. PubMed ID: 30156892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of radiological measures for diagnosing flatfoot.
Lo HC; Chu WC; Wu WK; Hsieh H; Chou CP; Sun SE; Chou PY; Liao CH; Guan XY; Li SC
Acta Radiol; 2012 Mar; 53(2):192-6. PubMed ID: 22184677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reproducibility of sagittal radiographic parameters in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis-a guide to reference values using serial imaging.
Hey HWD; Wong GC; Chan CX; Lau LL; Kumar N; Thambiah JS; Ruiz JN; Liu KG; Wong HK
Spine J; 2017 Jun; 17(6):830-836. PubMed ID: 28065817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of spinal curvature parameters as determined by the ZEBRIS spine examination method and the Cobb method in children with scoliosis.
Takács M; Orlovits Z; Jáger B; Kiss RM
PLoS One; 2018; 13(7):e0200245. PubMed ID: 29985957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. EOS microdose protocol for the radiological follow-up of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
Ilharreborde B; Ferrero E; Alison M; Mazda K
Eur Spine J; 2016 Feb; 25(2):526-31. PubMed ID: 25906380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Three-dimensional pelvic incidence is much higher in (thoraco)lumbar scoliosis than in controls.
Brink RC; Vavruch L; Schlösser TPC; Abul-Kasim K; Ohlin A; Tropp H; Castelein RM; Vrtovec T
Eur Spine J; 2019 Mar; 28(3):544-550. PubMed ID: 30128762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Angle measurement reproducibility using EOS three-dimensional reconstructions in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated by posterior instrumentation.
Ilharreborde B; Steffen JS; Nectoux E; Vital JM; Mazda K; Skalli W; Obeid I
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Sep; 36(20):E1306-13. PubMed ID: 21697768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Windlass Mechanism in Individuals With Diabetes Mellitus, Peripheral Neuropathy, and Low Medial Longitudinal Arch Height.
Gelber JR; Sinacore DR; Strube MJ; Mueller MJ; Johnson JE; Prior FW; Hastings MK
Foot Ankle Int; 2014 Aug; 35(8):816-824. PubMed ID: 24917647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy on the preoperative assessment of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using biplanar low-dose stereoradiography: a comparison with computed tomography.
Yeung KH; Man GCW; Lam TP; Ng BKW; Cheng JCY; Chu WCW
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2020 Aug; 21(1):558. PubMed ID: 32811481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of spino-pelvic and postural alignment parameters on gait kinematics.
Otayek J; Bizdikian AJ; Yared F; Saad E; Bakouny Z; Massaad A; Ghanimeh J; Labaki C; Skalli W; Ghanem I; Kreichati G; Assi A
Gait Posture; 2020 Feb; 76():318-326. PubMed ID: 31891899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
