These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32036418)
1. Similar revision rates in clinical studies and arthroplasty registers and no bias for developer publications in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Hauer G; Bernhardt GA; Hohenberger G; Leitner L; Ruckenstuhl P; Leithner A; Gruber G; Sadoghi P Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2020 Apr; 140(4):537-544. PubMed ID: 32036418 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Revision of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty to Total Knee Arthroplasty: Is It as Good as a Primary Result? Lombardi AV; Kolich MT; Berend KR; Morris MJ; Crawford DA; Adams JB J Arthroplasty; 2018 Jul; 33(7S):S105-S108. PubMed ID: 29691172 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Correlation of revision rate of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of clinical studies and worldwide arthroplasty registers. Obermayr S; Klasan A; Rasic L; Hauer G; Leitner L; Leithner A; Sadoghi P Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2024 Nov; 144(11):4873-4886. PubMed ID: 39404769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Revision rates after knee replacement. Cumulative results from worldwide clinical studies versus joint registers. Pabinger C; Berghold A; Boehler N; Labek G Osteoarthritis Cartilage; 2013 Feb; 21(2):263-8. PubMed ID: 23220555 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Outcomes of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty After Aseptic Revision to Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Comparative Study of 768 TKAs and 578 UKAs Revised to TKAs from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register (1994 to 2011). Leta TH; Lygre SH; Skredderstuen A; Hallan G; Gjertsen JE; Rokne B; Furnes O J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2016 Mar; 98(6):431-40. PubMed ID: 26984910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Optimal usage of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a study of 41,986 cases from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales. Liddle AD; Pandit H; Judge A; Murray DW Bone Joint J; 2015 Nov; 97-B(11):1506-11. PubMed ID: 26530653 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction following revision of failed unicompartmental knee arthroplasty to total knee arthroplasty are as good as a primary total knee arthroplasty. Lim JBT; Pang HN; Tay KJD; Chia SL; Lo NN; Yeo SJ Knee; 2019 Aug; 26(4):847-852. PubMed ID: 31113700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Differences in Risk of Revision and Mortality Between Total and Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty. The Influence of Hospital Volume. Arias-de la Torre J; Valderas JM; Evans JP; Martín V; Molina AJ; Muñoz L; Pons-Cabrafiga M; Espallargues M; J Arthroplasty; 2019 May; 34(5):865-871. PubMed ID: 30772112 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty vs Total Knee Arthroplasty for Medial Compartment Arthritis in Patients Older Than 75 Years: Comparable Reoperation, Revision, and Complication Rates. Siman H; Kamath AF; Carrillo N; Harmsen WS; Pagnano MW; Sierra RJ J Arthroplasty; 2017 Jun; 32(6):1792-1797. PubMed ID: 28215968 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Larger range of motion and increased return to activity, but higher revision rates following unicompartmental versus total knee arthroplasty in patients under 65: a systematic review. Kleeblad LJ; van der List JP; Zuiderbaan HA; Pearle AD Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2018 Jun; 26(6):1811-1822. PubMed ID: 29185005 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The three-year survivorship of robotically assisted versus non-robotically assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. St Mart JP; de Steiger RN; Cuthbert A; Donnelly W Bone Joint J; 2020 Mar; 102-B(3):319-328. PubMed ID: 32114810 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Revision to TKA: Are Tibial Stems and Augments Associated With Improved Survivorship? Lewis PL; Davidson DC; Graves SE; de Steiger RN; Donnelly W; Cuthbert A Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Apr; 476(4):854-862. PubMed ID: 29481343 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Revision for unexplained pain following unicompartmental and total knee replacement. Baker PN; Petheram T; Avery PJ; Gregg PJ; Deehan DJ J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Sep; 94(17):e126. PubMed ID: 22992855 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Revision rates after total joint replacement: cumulative results from worldwide joint register datasets. Labek G; Thaler M; Janda W; Agreiter M; Stöckl B J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2011 Mar; 93(3):293-7. PubMed ID: 21357948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of survival and cost-effectiveness between unicondylar arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty in patients with primary osteoarthritis: a follow-up study of 50,493 knee replacements from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register. Koskinen E; Eskelinen A; Paavolainen P; Pulkkinen P; Remes V Acta Orthop; 2008 Aug; 79(4):499-507. PubMed ID: 18766483 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Revision of unicompartmental arthroplasty to total knee arthroplasty: not always a slam dunk! Sierra RJ; Kassel CA; Wetters NG; Berend KR; Della Valle CJ; Lombardi AV J Arthroplasty; 2013 Sep; 28(8 Suppl):128-32. PubMed ID: 23886408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Does unicompartmental knee arthroplasty have worse outcomes in spontaneous osteonecrosis of the knee than in medial compartment osteoarthritis? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Yoon C; Chang MJ; Chang CB; Choi JH; Lee SA; Kang SB Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2019 Mar; 139(3):393-403. PubMed ID: 30680456 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Early outcomes of twin-peg mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty compared with primary total knee arthroplasty. Lum ZC; Lombardi AV; Hurst JM; Morris MJ; Adams JB; Berend KR Bone Joint J; 2016 Oct; 98-B(10 Supple B):28-33. PubMed ID: 27694513 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Annual revision rates of partial versus total knee arthroplasty: A comparative meta-analysis. Chawla H; van der List JP; Christ AB; Sobrero MR; Zuiderbaan HA; Pearle AD Knee; 2017 Mar; 24(2):179-190. PubMed ID: 27916580 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. No bias for developer publications and no difference between first-generation trochlear-resurfacing versus trochlear-cutting implants in 15,306 cases of patellofemoral joint arthroplasty. Reihs B; Reihs F; Labek G; Hochegger M; Leithner A; Böhler N; Sadoghi P Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2018 Sep; 26(9):2809-2816. PubMed ID: 28840268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]