BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

353 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32036455)

  • 1. Guidelines for uveal melanoma: a critical appraisal of systematically identified guidelines using the AGREE II and AGREE-REX instrument.
    Steeb T; Hayani KM; Förster P; Liegl R; Toussaint F; Schlaak M; Berking C; Heppt MV
    J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2020 Apr; 146(4):1079-1088. PubMed ID: 32036455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Quality of Practice Guidelines for Melanoma: A Methodologic Appraisal with the AGREE II and AGREE-REX Instruments.
    Steeb T; Wessely A; Drexler K; Salzmann M; Toussaint F; Heinzerling L; Reinholz M; Berking C; Heppt MV
    Cancers (Basel); 2020 Jun; 12(6):. PubMed ID: 32570843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Critical Appraisal of Evidence- and Consensus-Based Guidelines for Actinic Keratosis.
    Wessely A; Steeb T; Heppt F; Hornung A; Kaufmann MD; Koch EAT; Toussaint F; Erdmann M; Berking C; Heppt MV
    Curr Oncol; 2021 Feb; 28(1):950-960. PubMed ID: 33617511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Uveal Melanoma UK National Guidelines.
    Nathan P; Cohen V; Coupland S; Curtis K; Damato B; Evans J; Fenwick S; Kirkpatrick L; Li O; Marshall E; McGuirk K; Ottensmeier C; Pearce N; Salvi S; Stedman B; Szlosarek P; Turnbull N;
    Eur J Cancer; 2015 Nov; 51(16):2404-12. PubMed ID: 26278648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quality and clinical applicability of recommendations for incontinence-associated dermatitis: A systematic review of guidelines and consensus statements.
    Chen Y; Gao Y; Zhang J; Niu M; Liu X; Zhang Y; Tian J
    J Clin Nurs; 2023 Jun; 32(11-12):2371-2382. PubMed ID: 35411654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. What information can we gain from the quality appraisal of guidelines with physical activity recommendations for cancer patients?A systematic review using the AGREE II and AGREE-REX tools.
    Zhou X; Yang Y; Li C; Gu S; Hou W; Lai X; Zhai L; Zhu Y
    Support Care Cancer; 2023 Jan; 31(1):97. PubMed ID: 36598576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The quality and clinical applicability of recommendations in pressure injury guidelines: A systematic review of clinical practice guidelines.
    Gillespie BM; Latimer S; Walker RM; McInnes E; Moore Z; Eskes AM; Li Z; Schoonhoven L; Boorman RJ; Chaboyer W
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2021 Mar; 115():103857. PubMed ID: 33508730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quality of clinical practice guidelines in dermatological oncology.
    de Haas ER; de Vijlder HC; van Reesema WS; van Everdingen JJ; Neumann HA
    J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2007 Oct; 21(9):1193-8. PubMed ID: 17894704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. NCCN Guidelines Insights: Uveal Melanoma, Version 1.2019.
    Rao PK; Barker C; Coit DG; Joseph RW; Materin M; Rengan R; Sosman J; Thompson JA; Albertini MR; Boland G; Carson Iii WE; Contreras C; Daniels GA; DiMaio D; Durham A; Fields RC; Fleming MD; Galan A; Gastman B; Grossman K; Guild V; Johnson D; Karakousis G; Lange JR; ; Margolin K; Nath S; Olszanski AJ; Ott PA; Ross MI; Salama AK; Skitzki J; Swetter SM; Wuthrick E; McMillian NR; Engh A
    J Natl Compr Canc Netw; 2020 Feb; 18(2):120-131. PubMed ID: 32023525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quality of therapeutic drug monitoring guidelines is suboptimal: an evaluation using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II instrument.
    Zeng M; Yi Q; Zeng L; Chen Z; Mi X; Song H; Zhang X; Li Y; Wang Q; Zhao R; Miao L; Zhang L
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Apr; 120():47-58. PubMed ID: 31678686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Appraisal of guidelines for androgenetic alopecia using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II instrument.
    Huang M; Zhou X
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2015 Dec; 21(6):1089-94. PubMed ID: 26507460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quality appraisal of clinical practice guidelines for diabetes mellitus published in China between 2007 and 2017 using the AGREE II instrument.
    Gao Y; Wang J; Luo X; Song X; Liu L; Ke L; Liao Z; Wang D; Mu Y; Chen Y; Estill JAM
    BMJ Open; 2019 Sep; 9(9):e022392. PubMed ID: 31488461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The quality of guidelines on the end-of-life care: a systematic quality appraisal using AGREE II instrument.
    Irajpour A; Hashemi M; Taleghani F
    Support Care Cancer; 2020 Apr; 28(4):1555-1561. PubMed ID: 31834517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment of the quality of recommendations from 161 clinical practice guidelines using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation-Recommendations Excellence (AGREE-REX) instrument shows there is room for improvement.
    Florez ID; Brouwers MC; Kerkvliet K; Spithoff K; Alonso-Coello P; Burgers J; Cluzeau F; Férvers B; Graham I; Grimshaw J; Hanna S; Kastner M; Kho M; Qaseem A; Straus S
    Implement Sci; 2020 Sep; 15(1):79. PubMed ID: 32948216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Methodological quality of clinical practice guidelines with physical activity recommendations for people diagnosed with cancer: A systematic critical appraisal using the AGREE II tool.
    Shallwani SM; King J; Thomas R; Thevenot O; De Angelis G; Aburub AS; Brosseau L
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(4):e0214846. PubMed ID: 30969981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quality appraisal of clinical nutrition practice guidelines for critically ill adult patients: a systematic review using the Advancing Guideline Development, Reporting and Evaluation in Health Care instrument II (AGREE-II) and AGREE-Recommendation Excellence (AGREE-REX).
    Cattani A; Teixeira PP; Eckert IDC; Busnello F; Gabriel F; Stein A; Silva FM
    Br J Nutr; 2023 Jan; 129(1):66-76. PubMed ID: 35272718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Guideline appraisal with AGREE II: online survey of the potential influence of AGREE II items on overall assessment of guideline quality and recommendation for use.
    Hoffmann-Eßer W; Siering U; Neugebauer EAM; Brockhaus AC; McGauran N; Eikermann M
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2018 Feb; 18(1):143. PubMed ID: 29482555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Methodological quality of guidelines for management of Lyme neuroborreliosis.
    Dersch R; Toews I; Sommer H; Rauer S; Meerpohl JJ
    BMC Neurol; 2015 Nov; 15():242. PubMed ID: 26607686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Diagnosis of pheochromocytoma: a clinical practice guideline appraisal using AGREE II instrument.
    Yan J; Min J; Zhou B
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2013 Aug; 19(4):626-32. PubMed ID: 22809219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quality of clinical practice guidelines in delirium: a systematic appraisal.
    Bush SH; Marchington KL; Agar M; Davis DH; Sikora L; Tsang TW
    BMJ Open; 2017 Mar; 7(3):e013809. PubMed ID: 28283488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.