BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32036710)

  • 1. Effectiveness of Transthoracic Hybrid Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: A Meta-Analysis.
    Wei ZD; Zhang HL; Yang YS; Chen LQ
    J Invest Surg; 2021 Sep; 34(9):963-973. PubMed ID: 32036710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Totally minimally invasive esophagectomy versus hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    van Workum F; Klarenbeek BR; Baranov N; Rovers MM; Rosman C
    Dis Esophagus; 2020 Aug; 33(8):. PubMed ID: 32350519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of Phased Implementation of Totally Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer after Previous Adoption of the Hybrid Minimally Invasive Technique: Results from a French Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study.
    Nuytens F; Lenne X; Clément G; Bruandet A; Eveno C; Piessen G
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2022 May; 29(5):2791-2801. PubMed ID: 34837133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Lasting symptoms and long-term health-related quality of life after totally minimally invasive, hybrid and open Ivor Lewis esophagectomy.
    Eyck BM; Klevebro F; van der Wilk BJ; Johar A; Wijnhoven BPL; van Lanschot JJB; Lagergren P; Markar SR; Lagarde SM;
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2022 Mar; 48(3):582-588. PubMed ID: 34763951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Open versus hybrid versus totally minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Bras Harriott C; Angeramo CA; Casas MA; Schlottmann F
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2022 Dec; 164(6):e233-e254. PubMed ID: 35164948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Could hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy improve the treatment results of esophageal cancer?
    Bjelovic M; Babic T; Spica B; Gunjic D; Veselinovic M; Trajkovic G
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2016 Aug; 42(8):1196-201. PubMed ID: 27316602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Efficacy of hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy
    Yang J; Chen L; Ge K; Yang JL
    World J Gastrointest Oncol; 2019 Nov; 11(11):1081-1091. PubMed ID: 31798787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy vs. open esophagectomy: a matched case analysis in 120 patients.
    Glatz T; Marjanovic G; Kulemann B; Sick O; Hopt UT; Hoeppner J
    Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2017 Mar; 402(2):323-331. PubMed ID: 28083680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Health-related Quality of Life Following Hybrid Minimally Invasive Versus Open Esophagectomy for Patients With Esophageal Cancer, Analysis of a Multicenter, Open-label, Randomized Phase III Controlled Trial: The MIRO Trial.
    Mariette C; Markar S; Dabakuyo-Yonli TS; Meunier B; Pezet D; Collet D; D'Journo XB; Brigand C; Perniceni T; Carrere N; Mabrut JY; Msika S; Peschaud F; Prudhomme M; Bonnetain F; Piessen G;
    Ann Surg; 2020 Jun; 271(6):1023-1029. PubMed ID: 31404005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. McKeown or Ivor Lewis totally minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    van Workum F; Berkelmans GH; Klarenbeek BR; Nieuwenhuijzen GAP; Luyer MDP; Rosman C
    J Thorac Dis; 2017 Jul; 9(Suppl 8):S826-S833. PubMed ID: 28815080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Recurrence and Survival after Minimally Invasive and Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer - A Post Hoc Analysis of the Ensure Study.
    Henckens SP; Schuring N; Elliott JA; Johar A; Markar SR; Gantxegi A; Lagergren P; Hanna GB; Pera M; Reynolds JV; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Gisbertz SS;
    Ann Surg; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38577796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Hybrid laparoscopic thoracotomic esophagectomy with intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis].
    Hoeppner J; Marjanovic G; Glatz T; Kulemann B; Hopt UT
    Chirurg; 2014 Jul; 85(7):628-35. PubMed ID: 25000930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Impact of Hybrid Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy with Neck-Abdominal First Approach on the Short- and Long-Term Outcomes for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.
    Hoshino A; Nakajima Y; Kawada K; Tokairin Y; Okada T; Matsui T; Yamaguchi K; Kawano T; Kinugasa Y
    World J Surg; 2020 Nov; 44(11):3829-3836. PubMed ID: 32591842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Five-Year Survival Outcomes of Hybrid Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy in Esophageal Cancer: Results of the MIRO Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Nuytens F; Dabakuyo-Yonli TS; Meunier B; Gagnière J; Collet D; D'Journo XB; Brigand C; Perniceni T; Carrère N; Mabrut JY; Msika S; Peschaud F; Prudhomme M; Markar SR; Piessen G;
    JAMA Surg; 2021 Apr; 156(4):323-332. PubMed ID: 33595631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Cancer: Single Center Experience after 44 Consecutive Cases.
    Bjelović M; Babič T; Gunjić D; Veselinović M; Špica B
    Srp Arh Celok Lek; 2015; 143(7-8):410-5. PubMed ID: 26506750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Is minimally invasive surgery beneficial in the management of esophageal cancer? A meta-analysis.
    Nagpal K; Ahmed K; Vats A; Yakoub D; James D; Ashrafian H; Darzi A; Moorthy K; Athanasiou T
    Surg Endosc; 2010 Jul; 24(7):1621-9. PubMed ID: 20108155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hybrid robotic versus hybrid laparoscopic Ivor Lewis oesophagectomy: a case-matched analysis.
    Giulini L; Nasser CA; Tank J; Papp M; Stein HJ; Dubecz A
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2021 Jun; 59(6):1279-1285. PubMed ID: 33448299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Robot-Assisted, Video-Assisted, and Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Mederos MA; de Virgilio MJ; Shenoy R; Ye L; Toste PA; Mak SS; Booth MS; Begashaw MM; Wilson M; Gunnar W; Shekelle PG; Maggard-Gibbons M; Girgis MD
    JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Nov; 4(11):e2129228. PubMed ID: 34724556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparisons between minimally invasive and open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer with cervical anastomosis: a retrospective study.
    Li Z; Liu C; Liu Y; Yao S; Xu B; Dong G
    J Cardiothorac Surg; 2020 Jun; 15(1):128. PubMed ID: 32513211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Biere SS; Cuesta MA; van der Peet DL
    Minerva Chir; 2009 Apr; 64(2):121-33. PubMed ID: 19365313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.