These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32036741)

  • 1. Replication crisis = trust crisis? The effect of successful vs failed replications on laypeople's trust in researchers and research.
    Hendriks F; Kienhues D; Bromme R
    Public Underst Sci; 2020 Apr; 29(3):270-288. PubMed ID: 32036741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Measuring Laypeople's Trust in Experts in a Digital Age: The Muenster Epistemic Trustworthiness Inventory (METI).
    Hendriks F; Kienhues D; Bromme R
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(10):e0139309. PubMed ID: 26474078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evoking vigilance: Would you (dis)trust a scientist who discusses ethical implications of research in a science blog?
    Hendriks F; Kienhues D; Bromme R
    Public Underst Sci; 2016 Nov; 25(8):992-1008. PubMed ID: 27150266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Exploring laypeople's epistemic beliefs about medicine - a factor-analytic survey study.
    Kienhues D; Bromme R
    BMC Public Health; 2012 Sep; 12():759. PubMed ID: 22963643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Science communication gets personal: Ambivalent effects of self-disclosure in science communication on trust in science.
    Altenmüller MS; Kampschulte L; Verbeek L; Gollwitzer M
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2023 Dec; 29(4):793-812. PubMed ID: 37589716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. When research is me-search: How researchers' motivation to pursue a topic affects laypeople's trust in science.
    Altenmüller MS; Lange LL; Gollwitzer M
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(7):e0253911. PubMed ID: 34242274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Replication and trustworthiness.
    Peels R; Bouter L
    Account Res; 2023 Feb; 30(2):77-87. PubMed ID: 34346793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of Enthusiastic Language on the Credibility of Health Information and the Trustworthiness of Science Communicators: Insights From a Between-Subject Web-Based Experiment.
    König L; Jucks R
    Interact J Med Res; 2019 Aug; 8(3):e13619. PubMed ID: 31411138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Balance as Credibility? How Presenting One- vs. Two-Sided Messages Affects Ratings of Scientists' and Politicians' Trustworthiness.
    Hendriks F; Janssen I; Jucks R
    Health Commun; 2023 Dec; 38(12):2757-2764. PubMed ID: 35980101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Regaining Trust in Public Health and Biomedical Science following Covid: The Role of Scientists.
    Caplan AL
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2023 Sep; 53 Suppl 2():S105-S109. PubMed ID: 37963043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Is Psychological Science Self-Correcting? Citations Before and After Successful and Failed Replications.
    von Hippel PT
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2022 Nov; 17(6):1556-1565. PubMed ID: 35713980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effects of communicating uncertainty on public trust in facts and numbers.
    van der Bles AM; van der Linden S; Freeman ALJ; Spiegelhalter DJ
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2020 Apr; 117(14):7672-7683. PubMed ID: 32205438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Gaining trust as well as respect in communicating to motivated audiences about science topics.
    Fiske ST; Dupree C
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2014 Sep; 111 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):13593-7. PubMed ID: 25225372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Indicators of trustworthiness in lay-friendly research summaries: Scientificness surpasses easiness.
    Jonas M; Kerwer M; Chasiotis A; Rosman T
    Public Underst Sci; 2024 Jan; 33(1):37-57. PubMed ID: 37278009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Do Open-Science Badges Increase Trust in Scientists Among Undergraduates, Scientists, and the Public?
    Schneider J; Rosman T; Kelava A; Merk S
    Psychol Sci; 2022 Sep; 33(9):1588-1604. PubMed ID: 36001881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Using Social Media Data to Understand the Impact of Promotional Information on Laypeople's Discussions: A Case Study of Lynch Syndrome.
    Bian J; Zhao Y; Salloum RG; Guo Y; Wang M; Prosperi M; Zhang H; Du X; Ramirez-Diaz LJ; He Z; Sun Y
    J Med Internet Res; 2017 Dec; 19(12):e414. PubMed ID: 29237586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How Experts' Use of Medical Technical Jargon in Different Types of Online Health Forums Affects Perceived Information Credibility: Randomized Experiment With Laypersons.
    Zimmermann M; Jucks R
    J Med Internet Res; 2018 Jan; 20(1):e30. PubMed ID: 29362212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Attacking science on social media: How user comments affect perceived trustworthiness and credibility.
    Gierth L; Bromme R
    Public Underst Sci; 2020 Feb; 29(2):230-247. PubMed ID: 31804151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The "replication crisis" in the public eye: Germans' awareness and perceptions of the (ir)reproducibility of scientific research.
    Mede NG; Schäfer MS; Ziegler R; Weißkopf M
    Public Underst Sci; 2021 Jan; 30(1):91-102. PubMed ID: 32924865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Trust and Credibility in Web-Based Health Information: A Review and Agenda for Future Research.
    Sbaffi L; Rowley J
    J Med Internet Res; 2017 Jun; 19(6):e218. PubMed ID: 28630033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.