These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32036763)

  • 21. Assessment of implicit sexual associations in non-incarcerated pedophiles.
    van Leeuwen ML; van Baaren RB; Chakhssi F; Loonen MG; Lippman M; Dijksterhuis A
    Arch Sex Behav; 2013 Nov; 42(8):1501-7. PubMed ID: 23613137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The Revised Screening Scale for Pedophilic Interests: Predictive and Concurrent Validity.
    Seto MC; Sandler JC; Freeman NJ
    Sex Abuse; 2017 Oct; 29(7):636-657. PubMed ID: 26680250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Test-Retest Reliability and Minimal Detectable Change of Randomized Dichotic Digits in Learning-Disabled Children: Implications for Dichotic Listening Training.
    Mahdavi ME; Pourbakht A; Parand A; Jalaie S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Mar; 29(3):223-232. PubMed ID: 29488872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Test-retest reliability and predictive validity of the Implicit Association Test in children.
    Rae JR; Olson KR
    Dev Psychol; 2018 Feb; 54(2):308-330. PubMed ID: 29251966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Taxometric analyses of pedophilia utilizing self-report, behavioral, and sexual arousal indicators.
    Stephens S; Leroux E; Skilling T; Cantor JM; Seto MC
    J Abnorm Psychol; 2017 Nov; 126(8):1114-1119. PubMed ID: 29154571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Reliability and validity of the DSM-IV-TR and proposed DSM-5 criteria for pedophilia: Implications for the ICD-11 and the next DSM.
    Seto MC; Fedoroff JP; Bradford JM; Knack N; Rodrigues NC; Curry S; Booth B; Gray J; Cameron C; Bourget D; Messina S; James E; Watson D; Gulati S; Balmaceda R; Ahmed AG
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2016; 49(Pt A):98-106. PubMed ID: 27665026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Childhood sexual victimization, pedophilic interest, and sexual recidivism.
    Nunes KL; Hermann CA; Renee Malcom J; Lavoie K
    Child Abuse Negl; 2013 Sep; 37(9):703-11. PubMed ID: 23517571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Age Diversity Among Victims of Hebephilic Sexual Offenders.
    Stephens S; Seto MC; Goodwill AM; Cantor JM
    Sex Abuse; 2018 Apr; 30(3):322-339. PubMed ID: 27566153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The virtual people set: developing computer-generated stimuli for the assessment of pedophilic sexual interest.
    Dombert B; Mokros A; Brückner E; Schlegl V; Antfolk J; Bäckström A; Zappalà A; Osterheider M; Santtila P
    Sex Abuse; 2013 Dec; 25(6):557-82. PubMed ID: 23296092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The Revised Screening Scale for Pedophilic Interests (SSPI-2): Development and Criterion-Related Validation.
    Seto MC; Stephens S; Lalumière ML; Cantor JM
    Sex Abuse; 2017 Oct; 29(7):619-635. PubMed ID: 26589444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Assessment of pedophilia using hemodynamic brain response to sexual stimuli.
    Ponseti J; Granert O; Jansen O; Wolff S; Beier K; Neutze J; Deuschl G; Mehdorn H; Siebner H; Bosinski H
    Arch Gen Psychiatry; 2012 Feb; 69(2):187-94. PubMed ID: 21969422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The utility of the diagnosis of pedophilia: a comparison of various classification procedures.
    Kingston DA; Firestone P; Moulden HM; Bradford JM
    Arch Sex Behav; 2007 Jun; 36(3):423-36. PubMed ID: 17186129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Differences in Sexual Interest in Children Between Men Who Commit Undetected Versus Detected Sexual Offenses.
    Stephens S; Klein LK; Seto MC
    Sex Abuse; 2021 Apr; 33(3):255-273. PubMed ID: 31820672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Pedophilia. Prevalence, etiology, and diagnostics].
    Mokros A; Osterheider M; Nitschke J
    Nervenarzt; 2012 Mar; 83(3):355-8. PubMed ID: 21909808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. How well do indirect measures assess sexual interest in children? A meta-analysis.
    Pedneault CI; Hilgard J; Pettersen C; Hermann CA; White K; Nunes KL
    J Consult Clin Psychol; 2021 Apr; 89(4):350-363. PubMed ID: 33734722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. An Indirect Measure of Implicit Sexual Assertiveness: Reliability and Validity of the Sexual Assertiveness IAT in Young Adults in The Netherlands.
    van Lankveld J; van den Eijnden R; Emmerink P; Ter Bogt T; Pat-El R; Vanwesenbeeck I
    J Sex Marital Ther; 2022; 48(6):628-640. PubMed ID: 35188080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Undetected and detected child sexual abuse and child pornography offenders.
    Neutze J; Grundmann D; Scherner G; Beier KM
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2012; 35(3):168-75. PubMed ID: 22420934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Reliability and validity of a vertical numerical rating scale supplemented with a faces rating scale in measuring fatigue after stroke.
    Chuang LL; Lin KC; Hsu AL; Wu CY; Chang KC; Li YC; Chen YL
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2015 Jun; 13():91. PubMed ID: 26122080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Implicit attitudes towards homosexuality: reliability, validity, and controllability of the IAT.
    Banse R; Seise J; Zerbes N
    Z Exp Psychol; 2001; 48(2):145-60. PubMed ID: 11392982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Psychometric Properties of the Memory Binding Test: Test-Retest Reliability and Convergent Validity.
    Gramunt N; Sánchez-Benavides G; Buschke H; Lipton RB; Masramon X; Gispert JD; Peña-Casanova J; Fauria K; Molinuevo JL
    J Alzheimers Dis; 2016; 50(4):999-1010. PubMed ID: 26836167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.