134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32037641)
1. Cryonics for all?
Thau T
Bioethics; 2020 Sep; 34(7):638-644. PubMed ID: 32037641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The case for cryonics.
Moen OM
J Med Ethics; 2015 Aug; 41(8):677-81. PubMed ID: 25717141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cryonics: Traps and transformations.
Story D
Bioethics; 2024 May; 38(4):351-355. PubMed ID: 38425091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cryonics in the Courtroom: Which Interests? Whose Interests?
Huxtable R
Med Law Rev; 2018 Aug; 26(3):476-499. PubMed ID: 29077877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mourning the frozen: considering the relational implications of cryonics.
Hillenbrink R; Wareham CS
J Med Ethics; 2024 May; 50(6):388-391. PubMed ID: 37451855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cryoethics: seeking life after death.
Shaw D
Bioethics; 2009 Nov; 23(9):515-21. PubMed ID: 19788649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Extreme life extension: investing in cryonics for the long, long term.
Romain T
Med Anthropol; 2010 Apr; 29(2):194-215. PubMed ID: 20455144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The fallacy of the Principle of Procreative Beneficence.
Bennett R
Bioethics; 2009 Jun; 23(5):265-73. PubMed ID: 18477055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Autonomy and assisted suicide. The execution of freedom.
Safranek JP
Hastings Cent Rep; 1998; 28(4):32-6. PubMed ID: 9762538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Consequences for patients of health care professionals' conscientious actions: the ban on abortions in South Australia.
Cannold L
J Med Ethics; 1994 Jun; 20(2):80-6. PubMed ID: 8083879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Non-consensual treatment is (nearly always) morally impermissible.
Cherry MJ
J Law Med Ethics; 2010; 38(4):789-98. PubMed ID: 21105942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Euthanasia and cryothanasia.
Minerva F; Sandberg A
Bioethics; 2017 Sep; 31(7):526-533. PubMed ID: 28786175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Polarity within beneficence. Additional thoughts on nonaggressive obstetric management.
Abrams FR
JAMA; 1989 Jun; 261(23):3454-5. PubMed ID: 2724489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Robot Lies in Health Care: When Is Deception Morally Permissible?
Matthias A
Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 2015 Jun; 25(2):169-92. PubMed ID: 26144538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Euthanasia: a contemporary moral quandary.
Reichel W; Dyck AJ
Lancet; 1989 Dec; 2(8675):1321-3. PubMed ID: 2574265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Donaldson v. Van de Kamp: cryonics, assisted suicide, and the challenges of medical science.
Pommer RW
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1993; 9():589-603. PubMed ID: 10183890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cryonics: Science or Religion.
Dein S
J Relig Health; 2022 Aug; 61(4):3164-3176. PubMed ID: 33523374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. ATTITUDES AND ACCEPTANCE TOWARD THE TECHNOLOGY OF CRYONICS IN GERMANY.
Kaiser S; Gross D; Lohmeier J; Rosentreter M; Raschke J
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2014 Feb; ():1-7. PubMed ID: 24499638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Parental Decision Making: The Best Interest Principle, Child Autonomy, and Reasonableness.
Hubbard R; Greenblum J
HEC Forum; 2019 Sep; 31(3):233-240. PubMed ID: 30826966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ravines and sugar pills: defending deceptive placebo use.
Pugh J
J Med Philos; 2015 Feb; 40(1):83-101. PubMed ID: 25503607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
