166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32038371)
1. I Would Speak Up to Live Up to Your Trust: The Role of Psychological Safety and Regulatory Focus.
Song Y; Peng P; Yu G
Front Psychol; 2019; 10():2966. PubMed ID: 32038371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The High-Performance Work System, Employee Voice, and Innovative Behavior: The Moderating Role of Psychological Safety.
Miao R; Lu L; Cao Y; Du Q
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Feb; 17(4):. PubMed ID: 32059559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Impact of Paradoxical Leadership on Employee Voice Behavior: A Moderated Mediation Model.
Li X; Xue Y; Liang H; Yan D
Front Psychol; 2020; 11():537756. PubMed ID: 33071857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A suggestion to improve a day keeps your depletion away: Examining promotive and prohibitive voice behaviors within a regulatory focus and ego depletion framework.
Lin SH; Johnson RE
J Appl Psychol; 2015 Sep; 100(5):1381-97. PubMed ID: 25706447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. How Does Group Climate Foster or Hinder Employee Voice? A Cross-Level Examination.
Qian X; Li Q; Wang J; Gong S; Zhou H
Front Psychol; 2021; 12():609953. PubMed ID: 34712162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The content of the message matters: The differential effects of promotive and prohibitive team voice on team productivity and safety performance gains.
Li AN; Liao H; Tangirala S; Firth BM
J Appl Psychol; 2017 Aug; 102(8):1259-1270. PubMed ID: 28358532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Different Workplace Currencies and Employee Voice: From the Multidimensional Approach of Leader-Member Exchange.
Zhou Q; Huo D; Wu F
Front Psychol; 2020; 11():589. PubMed ID: 32411036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. How Does Paradoxical Leadership Affect Employees' Voice Behaviors in Workplace? A Leader-Member Exchange Perspective.
Xue Y; Li X; Liang H; Li Y
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Feb; 17(4):. PubMed ID: 32059578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. When Do Employees Speak Up Under Job Stressors? Exploring the Potential U-Shaped Relationship Between Hindrance Stressors and Voice Behavior.
Zhou L; Yang K; Wang Z; Luo Z
Front Psychol; 2019; 10():2336. PubMed ID: 31695642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Psychometric Validation of the Dutch Version of the Promotive and Prohibitive Voice Scale.
Sijbom RBL; Koen J
Front Psychol; 2021; 12():722238. PubMed ID: 34899466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Organizational adaptation to working from home in a crisis situation (COVID-19): the interaction between leaders' openness and followers' voice.
Buzás B; Faragó K
Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1181807. PubMed ID: 37303893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Regulatory Fit Demonstrates That Prohibitive Voice Does Not Lead to Low Performance Evaluation.
Yang L
Front Psychol; 2020; 11():581162. PubMed ID: 33324292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Does justice matter in voice? Inclusive leadership and employee voice: the moderating role of organizational justice perception.
Qi L; Xu Y; Liu B
Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1313922. PubMed ID: 38148784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Linking Abusive Supervision to Promotive and Prohibitive Voice Behavior: Testing the Mediating Roles of Work Engagement and Negative Reciprocity.
Wu J; Du Y
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 May; 19(9):. PubMed ID: 35564896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. I'm tired of listening: The effects of supervisor appraisals of group voice on supervisor emotional exhaustion and performance.
Sessions H; Nahrgang JD; Newton DW; Chamberlin M
J Appl Psychol; 2020 Jun; 105(6):619-636. PubMed ID: 31613116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Patient Safety Culture and Speaking Up Among Health Care Workers.
Lee SE; Dahinten VS; Seo JK; Park I; Lee MY; Han HS
Asian Nurs Res (Korean Soc Nurs Sci); 2023 Feb; 17(1):30-36. PubMed ID: 36623721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Nonlinear consequences of promotive and prohibitive voice for managers' responses: The roles of voice frequency and LMX.
Huang X; Xu E; Huang L; Liu W
J Appl Psychol; 2018 Oct; 103(10):1101-1120. PubMed ID: 29939035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Inhibitory Effect of Perceived Organizational Politics on Employee Voice Behavior: A Moderated Mediation Model.
Liu Q; Zhou H; Sheng X
Front Psychol; 2021; 12():727893. PubMed ID: 34603151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. I will speak up if my voice is socially desirable: A moderated mediating process of promotive versus prohibitive voice.
Wei X; Zhang ZX; Chen XP
J Appl Psychol; 2015 Sep; 100(5):1641-52. PubMed ID: 25844927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The dispositional antecedents of promotive and prohibitive voice.
Kakkar H; Tangirala S; Srivastava NK; Kamdar D
J Appl Psychol; 2016 Sep; 101(9):1342-51. PubMed ID: 27599091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
