BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

680 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32038971)

  • 1. Comparison of prostate cancer detection rates between magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy and transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy according to Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System in patients with PSA ≥4 ng/mL: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Zhu K; Qin Z; Xue J; Miao C; Tian Y; Liu S; Zhu S; Gu Q; Hou C; Xu A; Yang J; Wang Z
    Transl Androl Urol; 2019 Dec; 8(6):741-753. PubMed ID: 32038971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of Cancer Detection Rates Between TRUS-Guided Biopsy and MRI-Targeted Biopsy According to PSA Level in Biopsy-Naive Patients: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.
    Choi YH; Kang MY; Sung HH; Jeon HG; Chang Jeong B; Seo SI; Jeon SS; Kim CK; Park BK; Lee HM
    Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2019 Feb; 17(1):e19-e25. PubMed ID: 30415878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Risk-stratification based on magnetic resonance imaging and prostate-specific antigen density may reduce unnecessary follow-up biopsy procedures in men on active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer.
    Alberts AR; Roobol MJ; Drost FH; van Leenders GJ; Bokhorst LP; Bangma CH; Schoots IG
    BJU Int; 2017 Oct; 120(4):511-519. PubMed ID: 28267899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prostate cancer detection rate in men undergoing transperineal template-guided saturation and targeted prostate biopsy.
    Kaufmann B; Saba K; Schmidli TS; Stutz S; Bissig L; Britschgi AJ; Schaeren E; Gu A; Langenegger N; Sulser T; Eberli D; Keller EX; Hermanns T; Poyet C
    Prostate; 2022 Feb; 82(3):388-396. PubMed ID: 34914121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy may enhance the diagnostic accuracy of significant prostate cancer detection compared to standard transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Schoots IG; Roobol MJ; Nieboer D; Bangma CH; Steyerberg EW; Hunink MG
    Eur Urol; 2015 Sep; 68(3):438-50. PubMed ID: 25480312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Association Between Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) Score for the Index Lesion and Multifocal, Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
    Stabile A; Dell'Oglio P; De Cobelli F; Esposito A; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Brembilla G; Cristel G; Cardone G; Deho' F; Losa A; Suardi N; Gaboardi F; Del Maschio A; Montorsi F; Briganti A
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 May; 1(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 31100225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effectiveness and Accuracy of MRI-Ultrasound Fusion Targeted Biopsy Based on PI-RADS v2.1 Category in Transition/Peripheral Zone of the Prostate.
    Liu Y; Wang S; Xu G; Zhou B; Zhang Y; Ye B; Xiang L; Zhang Y; Xu H
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2023 Sep; 58(3):709-717. PubMed ID: 36773016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Diagnostic efficacy of prostate cancer using targeted biopsy with 6-core systematic biopsy for patients with PI-RADS 5].
    Liu Y; Yuan CW; Wu JY; Shen Q; Xiao JX; Zhao Z; Wang XY; Li XS; He ZS; Zhou LQ
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2023 Oct; 55(5):812-817. PubMed ID: 37807733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. There Is No Way to Avoid Systematic Prostate Biopsies in Addition to Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Targeted Biopsies.
    Dell'Oglio P; Stabile A; Soligo M; Brembilla G; Esposito A; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Bravi CA; Dehò F; De Cobelli F; Montorsi F; Karnes RJ; Briganti A
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2020 Feb; 3(1):112-118. PubMed ID: 31411973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Positive Predictive Value of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 for the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Mazzone E; Stabile A; Pellegrino F; Basile G; Cignoli D; Cirulli GO; Sorce G; Barletta F; Scuderi S; Bravi CA; Cucchiara V; Fossati N; Gandaglia G; Montorsi F; Briganti A
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2021 Oct; 4(5):697-713. PubMed ID: 33358543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prediction of High-grade Prostate Cancer Following Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Improving the Rotterdam European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer Risk Calculators.
    Alberts AR; Roobol MJ; Verbeek JFM; Schoots IG; Chiu PK; Osses DF; Tijsterman JD; Beerlage HP; Mannaerts CK; Schimmöller L; Albers P; Arsov C
    Eur Urol; 2019 Feb; 75(2):310-318. PubMed ID: 30082150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-stratified Clinical Pathways and Systematic Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Biopsy Pathway for the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
    Woo S; Suh CH; Eastham JA; Zelefsky MJ; Morris MJ; Abida W; Scher HI; Sidlow R; Becker AS; Wibmer AG; Hricak H; Vargas HA
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2019 Nov; 2(6):605-616. PubMed ID: 31204311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Using Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) Scores to Select an Optimal Prostate Biopsy Method: A Secondary Analysis of the Trio Study.
    Ahdoot M; Lebastchi AH; Long L; Wilbur AR; Gomella PT; Mehralivand S; Daneshvar MA; Yerram NK; O'Connor LP; Wang AZ; Gurram S; Bloom J; Siddiqui MM; Linehan WM; Merino M; Choyke PL; Pinsky P; Parnes H; Shih JH; Turkbey B; Wood BJ; Pinto PA;
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2022 Apr; 5(2):176-186. PubMed ID: 33846112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Prostate Biopsy Compared with Systematic Prostate Biopsy in Biopsy-naïve Patients with Suspected Prostate Cancer.
    Alkema NG; Hoogeveen SFJS; Cauberg ECC; Witte LPW; van 't Veer-Ten Kate M; de Boer E; Hoogland MAM; Blanker MH; Boomsma MF; Steffens MG
    Eur Urol Open Sci; 2022 Oct; 44():125-130. PubMed ID: 36185584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Characteristics of Prostate Cancer Found at Fifth Screening in the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer Rotterdam: Can We Selectively Detect High-grade Prostate Cancer with Upfront Multivariable Risk Stratification and Magnetic Resonance Imaging?
    Alberts AR; Schoots IG; Bokhorst LP; Drost FH; van Leenders GJ; Krestin GP; Dwarkasing RS; Barentsz JO; Schröder FH; Bangma CH; Roobol MJ
    Eur Urol; 2018 Mar; 73(3):343-350. PubMed ID: 28647216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessing the Clinical Value of Positive Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Young Men with a Suspicion of Prostate Cancer.
    Stabile A; Dell'Oglio P; Soligo M; De Cobelli F; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Esposito A; Brembilla G; Karnes RJ; Montorsi F; Briganti A
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2021 Aug; 4(4):594-600. PubMed ID: 31204312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Early experience with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsies under visual transrectal ultrasound guidance in patients suspicious for prostate cancer undergoing repeated biopsy.
    Boesen L; Noergaard N; Chabanova E; Logager V; Balslev I; Mikines K; Thomsen HS
    Scand J Urol; 2015 Feb; 49(1):25-34. PubMed ID: 24922550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prostate Cancer Risk Assessment in Biopsy-naïve Patients: The Rotterdam Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator in Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Transrectal Ultrasound (TRUS) Fusion Biopsy and Systematic TRUS Biopsy.
    Mannaerts CK; Gayet M; Verbeek JF; Engelbrecht MRW; Savci-Heijink CD; Jager GJ; Gielens MPM; van der Linden H; Beerlage HP; de Reijke TM; Wijkstra H; Roobol MJ
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Jun; 1(2):109-117. PubMed ID: 31100233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Is targeted magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy enough for the detection of prostate cancer in patients with PI-RADS ≥3: Results of a prospective, randomized clinical trial.
    Zhang J; Zhu A; Sun D; Guo S; Zhang H; Liu S; Fu Q; Zhang K
    J Cancer Res Ther; 2020; 16(7):1698-1702. PubMed ID: 33565519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Usefulness of MRI targeted prostate biopsy for detecting clinically significant prostate cancer in men with low prostate-specific antigen levels.
    Bang S; Yu J; Chung JH; Song W; Kang M; Sung HH; Jeon HG; Jeong BC; Seo SI; Lee HM; Jeon SS
    Sci Rep; 2021 Nov; 11(1):21951. PubMed ID: 34753938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 34.