These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32039463)

  • 1. Comparison of eleven commonly used formulae for sonographic estimation of fetal weight in prediction of actual birth weight.
    Plonka M; Bociaga M; Radon-Pokracka M; Nowak M; Huras H
    Ginekol Pol; 2020; 91(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 32039463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Finding the best formula to predict the fetal weight: comparison of 18 formulas.
    Esinler D; Bircan O; Esin S; Sahin EG; Kandemir O; Yalvac S
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2015; 80(2):78-84. PubMed ID: 26183256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fetal weight estimation in extreme macrosomia (≥ 4,500 g): comparison of 10 formulas.
    Faschingbauer F; Voigt F; Goecke TW; Siemer J; Beckmann MW; Yazdi B; Schild RL
    Ultraschall Med; 2012 Dec; 33(7):E62-E67. PubMed ID: 22179801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of sonographic fetal weight estimation formulas in patients with preterm premature rupture of membranes.
    Warshafsky C; Ronzoni S; Quaglietta P; Weiner E; Zaltz A; Barrett J; Melamed N; Aviram A
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2021 Feb; 21(1):149. PubMed ID: 33607956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ultrasonographic weight estimation in large for gestational age fetuses: a comparison of 17 sonographic formulas and four models algorithms.
    Rosati P; Arduini M; Giri C; Guariglia L
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2010 Jul; 23(7):675-80. PubMed ID: 19895358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ultrasound estimation of birth weight in twin pregnancy: comparison of biometry algorithms in the STORK multiple pregnancy cohort.
    Khalil A; D'Antonio F; Dias T; Cooper D; Thilaganathan B;
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Aug; 44(2):210-20. PubMed ID: 24311473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Predictive value of a single early fetal weight estimate in normal pregnancies.
    Ben-Haroush A; Yogev Y; Hod M; Bar J
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2007 Feb; 130(2):187-92. PubMed ID: 16720074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prospective verification of sonographic fetal weight estimators among term parturients in Uganda.
    Sereke SG; Omara RO; Bongomin F; Nakubulwa S; Kisembo HN
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2021 Mar; 21(1):175. PubMed ID: 33663407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Third trimester ultrasound accuracy and delivery outcome in obese and morbid obese pregnant women.
    Al-Obaidly S; Al-Ibrahim A; Saleh N; Al-Belushi M; Al-Mansouri Z; Khenyab N
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2019 Apr; 32(8):1275-1279. PubMed ID: 29129159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Hadlock Method Is Superior to Newer Methods for the Prediction of the Birth Weight Percentile.
    Blue NR; Savabi M; Beddow ME; Katukuri VR; Fritts CM; Izquierdo LA; Chao CR
    J Ultrasound Med; 2019 Mar; 38(3):587-596. PubMed ID: 30244476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of sonographic fetal weight estimation prior to delivery in a Chinese han population.
    Shen Y; Zhao W; Lin J; Liu F
    J Clin Ultrasound; 2017 Oct; 45(8):465-471. PubMed ID: 28332212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The accuracy of ultrasound-estimated fetal weight in extremely preterm infants: a comparison of small for gestational age and appropriate for gestational age.
    Stefanelli S; Groom KM
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2014 Apr; 54(2):126-31. PubMed ID: 24571274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Do specific weight formulas for fetuses < or = 1500 g really improve weight estimation?
    Hoopmann M; Bernau B; Hart N; Schild RL; Siemer J
    Ultraschall Med; 2010 Feb; 31(1):48-52. PubMed ID: 20091464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Significant deviations in sonographic fetal weight estimation: causes and implications.
    Krispin E; Dreyfuss E; Fischer O; Wiznitzer A; Hadar E; Bardin R
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2020 Dec; 302(6):1339-1344. PubMed ID: 32748053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparing the relation between ultrasound-estimated fetal weight and birthweight in cohort of small-for-gestational-age fetuses.
    Stephens K; Al-Memar M; Beattie-Jones S; Dhanjal M; Mappouridou S; Thorne E; Lees C
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2019 Nov; 98(11):1435-1441. PubMed ID: 31090917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Utility of Formulas Using Fetal Thigh Soft Tissue Thickness in Estimating Weight in Gastroschisis.
    Chabra S; Sienas L; Hippe DS; Paulsene W; Dighe M
    J Ultrasound Med; 2020 Oct; 39(10):1977-1983. PubMed ID: 32320090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Two-stage approach for prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonate and adverse perinatal outcome by routine ultrasound examination at 35-37 weeks' gestation.
    Akolekar R; Panaitescu AM; Ciobanu A; Syngelaki A; Nicolaides KH
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Oct; 54(4):484-491. PubMed ID: 31271475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A new sonographic weight formula for fetuses Siemer J; Hilbert A; Hart N; Meurer B; Goecke T; Schild RL
    Ultraschall Med; 2009 Feb; 30(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 19137495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Limitations of clinical and sonographic estimates of birth weight: experience with 1034 parturients.
    Chauhan SP; Hendrix NW; Magann EF; Morrison JC; Kenney SP; Devoe LD
    Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Jan; 91(1):72-7. PubMed ID: 9464724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ultrasonographic estimation of fetal weight: development of new model and assessment of performance of previous models.
    Hammami A; Mazer Zumaeta A; Syngelaki A; Akolekar R; Nicolaides KH
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jul; 52(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 29611251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.