These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32039696)

  • 1. SeqBreed: a python tool to evaluate genomic prediction in complex scenarios.
    Pérez-Enciso M; Ramírez-Ayala LC; Zingaretti LM
    Genet Sel Evol; 2020 Feb; 52(1):7. PubMed ID: 32039696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Genome-wide association study and prediction of genomic breeding values for fatty-acid composition in Korean Hanwoo cattle using a high-density single-nucleotide polymorphism array.
    Bhuiyan MSA; Kim YK; Kim HJ; Lee DH; Lee SH; Yoon HB; Lee SH
    J Anim Sci; 2018 Sep; 96(10):4063-4075. PubMed ID: 30265318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. pSBVB: A Versatile Simulation Tool To Evaluate Genomic Selection in Polyploid Species.
    Zingaretti ML; Monfort A; Pérez-Enciso M
    G3 (Bethesda); 2019 Feb; 9(2):327-334. PubMed ID: 30573468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Use of a Bayesian model including QTL markers increases prediction reliability when test animals are distant from the reference population.
    Ma P; Lund MS; Aamand GP; Su G
    J Dairy Sci; 2019 Aug; 102(8):7237-7247. PubMed ID: 31155255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of genomic selection for a sib-evaluated trait using identity-by-state and identity-by-descent relationships.
    Vela-Avitúa S; Meuwissen TH; Luan T; Ødegård J
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Feb; 47(1):9. PubMed ID: 25888184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Development of genomic predictions for harvest and carcass weight in channel catfish.
    Garcia ALS; Bosworth B; Waldbieser G; Misztal I; Tsuruta S; Lourenco DAL
    Genet Sel Evol; 2018 Dec; 50(1):66. PubMed ID: 30547740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Genomic prediction of reproduction traits for Merino sheep.
    Bolormaa S; Brown DJ; Swan AA; van der Werf JHJ; Hayes BJ; Daetwyler HD
    Anim Genet; 2017 Jun; 48(3):338-348. PubMed ID: 28211150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Optimizing genomic prediction model given causal genes in a dairy cattle population.
    Teng J; Huang S; Chen Z; Gao N; Ye S; Diao S; Ding X; Yuan X; Zhang H; Li J; Zhang Z
    J Dairy Sci; 2020 Nov; 103(11):10299-10310. PubMed ID: 32952023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Using markers with large effect in genetic and genomic predictions.
    Lopes MS; Bovenhuis H; van Son M; Nordbø Ø; Grindflek EH; Knol EF; Bastiaansen JW
    J Anim Sci; 2017 Jan; 95(1):59-71. PubMed ID: 28177367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Genomic prediction using imputed whole-genome sequence data in Holstein Friesian cattle.
    van Binsbergen R; Calus MP; Bink MC; van Eeuwijk FA; Schrooten C; Veerkamp RF
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Sep; 47(1):71. PubMed ID: 26381777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Empirical comparison between different methods for genomic prediction of number of piglets born alive in moderate sized breeding populations.
    Fangmann A; Sharifi RA; Heinkel J; Danowski K; Schrade H; Erbe M; Simianer H
    J Anim Sci; 2017 Apr; 95(4):1434-1443. PubMed ID: 28464085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracies of breeding values for dry matter intake using nongenotyped animals and predictor traits in different lactations.
    Manzanilla-Pech CIV; Veerkamp RF; de Haas Y; Calus MPL; Ten Napel J
    J Dairy Sci; 2017 Nov; 100(11):9103-9114. PubMed ID: 28865857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Genomic prediction based on data from three layer lines: a comparison between linear methods.
    Calus MP; Huang H; Vereijken A; Visscher J; Ten Napel J; Windig JJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Oct; 46(1):57. PubMed ID: 25927219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reliability of genomic prediction for milk fatty acid composition by using a multi-population reference and incorporating GWAS results.
    Gebreyesus G; Bovenhuis H; Lund MS; Poulsen NA; Sun D; Buitenhuis B
    Genet Sel Evol; 2019 Apr; 51(1):16. PubMed ID: 31029078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An efficient unified model for genome-wide association studies and genomic selection.
    Li H; Su G; Jiang L; Bao Z
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Aug; 49(1):64. PubMed ID: 28836943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Genomic Prediction for Quantitative Traits Is Improved by Mapping Variants to Gene Ontology Categories in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Edwards SM; Sørensen IF; Sarup P; Mackay TF; Sørensen P
    Genetics; 2016 Aug; 203(4):1871-83. PubMed ID: 27235308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Genomic selection in a pig population including information from slaughtered full sibs of boars within a sib-testing program.
    Samorè AB; Buttazzoni L; Gallo M; Russo V; Fontanesi L
    Animal; 2015 May; 9(5):750-9. PubMed ID: 25510405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of genomic predictions using genomic relationship matrices built with different weighting factors to account for locus-specific variances.
    Su G; Christensen OF; Janss L; Lund MS
    J Dairy Sci; 2014 Oct; 97(10):6547-59. PubMed ID: 25129495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Geno-Diver: A combined coalescence and forward-in-time simulator for populations undergoing selection for complex traits.
    Howard JT; Tiezzi F; Pryce JE; Maltecca C
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2017 Dec; 134(6):553-563. PubMed ID: 28464287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Genomic predictions can accelerate selection for resistance against Piscirickettsia salmonis in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar).
    Bangera R; Correa K; Lhorente JP; Figueroa R; Yáñez JM
    BMC Genomics; 2017 Jan; 18(1):121. PubMed ID: 28143402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.