These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32039938)
1. Laparoscopic Versus Robotic-assisted Suturing Performance Among Novice Surgeons: A Blinded, Cross-Over Study. Møller SG; Dohrn N; Brisling SK; Larsen JCR; Klein M Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2020 Apr; 30(2):117-122. PubMed ID: 32039938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Transferability of Virtual Reality, Simulation-Based, Robotic Suturing Skills to a Live Porcine Model in Novice Surgeons: A Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial. Vargas MV; Moawad G; Denny K; Happ L; Misa NY; Margulies S; Opoku-Anane J; Abi Khalil E; Marfori C J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(3):420-425. PubMed ID: 28027975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Initial experience using a robotic-driven laparoscopic needle holder with ergonomic handle: assessment of surgeons' task performance and ergonomics. Sánchez-Margallo JA; Sánchez-Margallo FM Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2017 Dec; 12(12):2069-2077. PubMed ID: 28695479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Is a robotic system really better than the three-dimensional laparoscopic system in terms of suturing performance?: comparison among operators with different levels of experience. Park YS; Oo AM; Son SY; Shin DJ; Jung DH; Ahn SH; Park DJ; Kim HH Surg Endosc; 2016 Apr; 30(4):1485-90. PubMed ID: 26139502 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Robotic suturing on the FLS model possesses construct validity, is less physically demanding, and is favored by more surgeons compared with laparoscopy. Stefanidis D; Hope WW; Scott DJ Surg Endosc; 2011 Jul; 25(7):2141-6. PubMed ID: 21184110 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. 3D straight-stick laparoscopy versus 3D robotics for task performance in novice surgeons: a randomised crossover trial. Shakir F; Jan H; Kent A Surg Endosc; 2016 Dec; 30(12):5380-5387. PubMed ID: 27059971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of validity evidence for the RobotiX robot assisted surgery simulator on advanced suturing tasks. Leijte E; de Blaauw I; Rosman C; Botden SMBI BMC Surg; 2020 Aug; 20(1):183. PubMed ID: 32787831 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Developing an Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills for Laparoscopic Suturing and Intracorporeal Knot Tying. Chang OH; King LP; Modest AM; Hur HC J Surg Educ; 2016; 73(2):258-63. PubMed ID: 26597729 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Robot assisted versus laparoscopic suturing learning curve in a simulated setting. Leijte E; de Blaauw I; Van Workum F; Rosman C; Botden S Surg Endosc; 2020 Aug; 34(8):3679-3689. PubMed ID: 31754849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Objective assessment based on motion-related metrics and technical performance in laparoscopic suturing. Sánchez-Margallo JA; Sánchez-Margallo FM; Oropesa I; Enciso S; Gómez EJ Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2017 Feb; 12(2):307-314. PubMed ID: 27423649 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Robotic assistance improves intracorporeal suturing performance and safety in the operating room while decreasing operator workload. Stefanidis D; Wang F; Korndorffer JR; Dunne JB; Scott DJ Surg Endosc; 2010 Feb; 24(2):377-82. PubMed ID: 19536599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Distraction and proficiency in laparoscopy: 2D versus robotic console 3D immersion. Kim S; May A; Ryan H; Mohsin A; Tsuda S Surg Endosc; 2017 Nov; 31(11):4625-4630. PubMed ID: 28409364 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Robotic hepaticojejunostomy training in novices using robotic simulation and dry-lab suturing (ROSIM): randomized controlled crossover trial. Menso JE; Rahimi AM; Zwart MJW; Daams F; de Hondt J; Karadza E; Montorsi RM; Nickel F; Bonjer HJ; van Dijkum EJMN; Besselink MG Surg Endosc; 2024 Sep; 38(9):4906-4915. PubMed ID: 38958718 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Objective assessment of robotic suturing skills with a new computerized system: A step forward in the training of robotic surgeons. Busch C; Nakadate R; Uemura M; Obata S; Jimbo T; Hashizume M Asian J Endosc Surg; 2019 Oct; 12(4):388-395. PubMed ID: 30461209 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of laparoscopic and robotic assisted suturing performance by experts and novices. Chandra V; Nehra D; Parent R; Woo R; Reyes R; Hernandez-Boussard T; Dutta S Surgery; 2010 Jun; 147(6):830-9. PubMed ID: 20045162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Development and validation of a sensor- and expert model-based training system for laparoscopic surgery: the iSurgeon. Kowalewski KF; Hendrie JD; Schmidt MW; Garrow CR; Bruckner T; Proctor T; Paul S; Adigüzel D; Bodenstedt S; Erben A; Kenngott H; Erben Y; Speidel S; Müller-Stich BP; Nickel F Surg Endosc; 2017 May; 31(5):2155-2165. PubMed ID: 27604368 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Skills in minimally invasive and open surgery show limited transferability to robotic surgery: results from a prospective study. Kowalewski KF; Schmidt MW; Proctor T; Pohl M; Wennberg E; Karadza E; Romero P; Kenngott HG; Müller-Stich BP; Nickel F Surg Endosc; 2018 Apr; 32(4):1656-1667. PubMed ID: 29435749 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of a force feedback function in a surgical robot on the suturing procedure. Yamasaki Y; Tokunaga M; Sakai Y; Kayasuga H; Nishihara T; Tadano K; Kawashima K; Haruki S; Kinugasa Y Surg Endosc; 2024 Mar; 38(3):1222-1229. PubMed ID: 38092971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]