176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32040639)
1. Field performance of a low-cost sensor in the monitoring of particulate matter in Santiago, Chile.
Tagle M; Rojas F; Reyes F; Vásquez Y; Hallgren F; Lindén J; Kolev D; Watne ÅK; Oyola P
Environ Monit Assess; 2020 Feb; 192(3):171. PubMed ID: 32040639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Long-term field evaluation of the Plantower PMS low-cost particulate matter sensors.
Sayahi T; Butterfield A; Kelly KE
Environ Pollut; 2019 Feb; 245():932-940. PubMed ID: 30682749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Performance assessment of NOVA SDS011 low-cost PM sensor in various microenvironments.
Božilov A; Tasić V; Živković N; Lazović I; Blagojević M; Mišić N; Topalović D
Environ Monit Assess; 2022 Jul; 194(9):595. PubMed ID: 35857115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Low-cost sensors as an alternative for long-term air quality monitoring.
Liu X; Jayaratne R; Thai P; Kuhn T; Zing I; Christensen B; Lamont R; Dunbabin M; Zhu S; Gao J; Wainwright D; Neale D; Kan R; Kirkwood J; Morawska L
Environ Res; 2020 Jun; 185():109438. PubMed ID: 32276167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Field evaluation of particulate matter measurements using tapered element oscillating microbalance in a layer house.
Li QF; Wang-Li L; Liu Z; Heber AJ
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2012 Mar; 62(3):322-35. PubMed ID: 22482290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Performance evaluation of ozone and particulate matter sensors.
DeWitt HL; Crow WL; Flowers B
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2020 Mar; 70(3):292-306. PubMed ID: 31961265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Feasibility of using low-cost portable particle monitors for measurement of fine and coarse particulate matter in urban ambient air.
Han I; Symanski E; Stock TH
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2017 Mar; 67(3):330-340. PubMed ID: 27690287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. First assessment of the PM10 and PM2.5 particulate level in the ambient air of Belgrade city.
Rajsić SF; Tasić MD; Novaković VT; Tomasević MN
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2004; 11(3):158-64. PubMed ID: 15259698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A distributed network of low-cost continuous reading sensors to measure spatiotemporal variations of PM2.5 in Xi'an, China.
Gao M; Cao J; Seto E
Environ Pollut; 2015 Apr; 199():56-65. PubMed ID: 25618367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A land use regression model using machine learning and locally developed low cost particulate matter sensors in Uganda.
Coker ES; Amegah AK; Mwebaze E; Ssematimba J; Bainomugisha E
Environ Res; 2021 Aug; 199():111352. PubMed ID: 34043968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ambient and laboratory evaluation of a low-cost particulate matter sensor.
Kelly KE; Whitaker J; Petty A; Widmer C; Dybwad A; Sleeth D; Martin R; Butterfield A
Environ Pollut; 2017 Feb; 221():491-500. PubMed ID: 28012666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Relationships of relative humidity with PM
Lou C; Liu H; Li Y; Peng Y; Wang J; Dai L
Environ Monit Assess; 2017 Oct; 189(11):582. PubMed ID: 29063278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Temporal and spatial distribution of PM2.5 and PM10 pollution status and the correlation of particulate matters and meteorological factors during winter and spring in Beijing].
Zhao CX; Wang YQ; Wang YJ; Zhang HL; Zhao BQ
Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2014 Feb; 35(2):418-27. PubMed ID: 24812928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Five Years of Accurate PM
Robinson DL; Goodman N; Vardoulakis S
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2023 Nov; 20(23):. PubMed ID: 38063557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Development and field validation of a community-engaged particulate matter air quality monitoring network in Imperial, California, USA.
Carvlin GN; Lugo H; Olmedo L; Bejarano E; Wilkie A; Meltzer D; Wong M; King G; Northcross A; Jerrett M; English PB; Hammond D; Seto E
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2017 Dec; 67(12):1342-1352. PubMed ID: 28829718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Calibration of low-cost particulate matter sensors: Model development for a multi-city epidemiological study.
Zusman M; Schumacher CS; Gassett AJ; Spalt EW; Austin E; Larson TV; Carvlin G; Seto E; Kaufman JD; Sheppard L
Environ Int; 2020 Jan; 134():105329. PubMed ID: 31783241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Improving accuracy of air pollution exposure measurements: Statistical correction of a municipal low-cost airborne particulate matter sensor network.
Considine EM; Reid CE; Ogletree MR; Dye T
Environ Pollut; 2021 Jan; 268(Pt B):115833. PubMed ID: 33120139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Detection of PM
Kanabkaew T; Mekbungwan P; Raksakietisak S; Kanchanasut K
Environ Pollut; 2019 Sep; 252(Pt A):543-552. PubMed ID: 31170566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Low-Cost Sensor Performance Intercomparison, Correction Factor Development, and 2+ Years of Ambient PM
Raheja G; Nimo J; Appoh EK; Essien B; Sunu M; Nyante J; Amegah M; Quansah R; Arku RE; Penn SL; Giordano MR; Zheng Z; Jack D; Chillrud S; Amegah K; Subramanian R; Pinder R; Appah-Sampong E; Tetteh EN; Borketey MA; Hughes AF; Westervelt DM
Environ Sci Technol; 2023 Jul; 57(29):10708-10720. PubMed ID: 37437161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of a new low-cost particle sensor as an internet-of-things device for outdoor air quality monitoring.
Roberts FA; Van Valkinburgh K; Green A; Post CJ; Mikhailova EA; Commodore S; Pearce JL; Metcalf AR
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2022 Nov; 72(11):1219-1230. PubMed ID: 35759771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
