These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32040655)

  • 21. Transmission of Binaural Cues by Bilateral Cochlear Implants: Examining the Impacts of Bilaterally Independent Spectral Peak-Picking, Pulse Timing, and Compression.
    Gray WO; Mayo PG; Goupell MJ; Brown AD
    Trends Hear; 2021; 25():23312165211030411. PubMed ID: 34293981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Interaural Time-Difference Discrimination as a Measure of Place of Stimulation for Cochlear-Implant Users With Single-Sided Deafness.
    Bernstein JGW; Stakhovskaya OA; Schuchman GI; Jensen KK; Goupell MJ
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518765514. PubMed ID: 29623771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Envelope coding in the lateral superior olive. II. Characteristic delays and comparison with responses in the medial superior olive.
    Joris PX
    J Neurophysiol; 1996 Oct; 76(4):2137-56. PubMed ID: 8899590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Binaural sensitivity in children who use bilateral cochlear implants.
    Ehlers E; Goupell MJ; Zheng Y; Godar SP; Litovsky RY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jun; 141(6):4264. PubMed ID: 28618809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Envelope enhancement increases cortical sensitivity to interaural envelope delays with acoustic and electric hearing.
    Hartley DE; Isaiah A
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(8):e104097. PubMed ID: 25093417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effects of rate and age in processing interaural time and level differences in normal-hearing and bilateral cochlear-implant listeners.
    Anderson SR; Easter K; Goupell MJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Nov; 146(5):3232. PubMed ID: 31795662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Pitch and loudness matching of unmodulated and modulated stimuli in cochlear implantees.
    Vandali A; Sly D; Cowan R; van Hoesel R
    Hear Res; 2013 Aug; 302():32-49. PubMed ID: 23685148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effect of inter-aural temporal envelope differences on inter-aural time difference thresholds for amplitude modulated noise.
    Kanagokar V; Fathima H; Bhat JS; Muthu ANP
    Codas; 2024; 36(2):e20220261. PubMed ID: 38324806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Interaural time difference sensitivity under binaural cochlear implant stimulation persists at high pulse rates up to 900 pps.
    Buck AN; Buchholz S; Schnupp JW; Rosskothen-Kuhl N
    Sci Rep; 2023 Mar; 13(1):3785. PubMed ID: 36882473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of Interaural Electrode Pairing Methods for Bilateral Cochlear Implants.
    Hu H; Dietz M
    Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26631108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Perception and coding of interaural time differences with bilateral cochlear implants.
    Laback B; Egger K; Majdak P
    Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():138-50. PubMed ID: 25456088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Coherent Coding of Enhanced Interaural Cues Improves Sound Localization in Noise With Bilateral Cochlear Implants.
    Williges B; Jürgens T; Hu H; Dietz M
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518781746. PubMed ID: 29956589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Neural Processing of Acoustic and Electric Interaural Time Differences in Normal-Hearing Gerbils.
    Vollmer M
    J Neurosci; 2018 Aug; 38(31):6949-6966. PubMed ID: 29959238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Neural and behavioral sensitivity to interaural time differences using amplitude modulated tones with mismatched carrier frequencies.
    Blanks DA; Roberts JM; Buss E; Hall JW; Fitzpatrick DC
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2007 Sep; 8(3):393-408. PubMed ID: 17657543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Binaural timing information in electric hearing at low rates: Effects of inaccurate encoding and loudness.
    Egger K; Majdak P; Laback B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 May; 141(5):3164. PubMed ID: 28599571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Lateralization of interimplant timing and level differences in children who use bilateral cochlear implants.
    Salloum CA; Valero J; Wong DD; Papsin BC; van Hoesel R; Gordon KA
    Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):441-56. PubMed ID: 20489647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Cortical Representation of Interaural Time Difference Is Impaired by Deafness in Development: Evidence from Children with Early Long-term Access to Sound through Bilateral Cochlear Implants Provided Simultaneously.
    Easwar V; Yamazaki H; Deighton M; Papsin B; Gordon K
    J Neurosci; 2017 Mar; 37(9):2349-2361. PubMed ID: 28123078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Extent of lateralization at large interaural time differences in simulated electric hearing and bilateral cochlear implant users.
    Baumgärtel RM; Hu H; Kollmeier B; Dietz M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Apr; 141(4):2338. PubMed ID: 28464641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Neural ITD coding with bilateral cochlear implants: effect of binaurally coherent jitter.
    Hancock KE; Chung Y; Delgutte B
    J Neurophysiol; 2012 Aug; 108(3):714-28. PubMed ID: 22592306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Simulation of ITD-Dependent Single-Neuron Responses Under Electrical Stimulation and with Amplitude-Modulated Acoustic Stimuli.
    Hu H; Klug J; Dietz M
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2022 Aug; 23(4):535-550. PubMed ID: 35334001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.