380 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32040669)
21. Histogram analysis of diffusion kurtosis imaging derived maps may distinguish between low and high grade gliomas before surgery.
Qi XX; Shi DF; Ren SX; Zhang SY; Li L; Li QC; Guan LM
Eur Radiol; 2018 Apr; 28(4):1748-1755. PubMed ID: 29143940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Classification of low- and high-grade gliomas using radiomic analysis of multiple sequences of MRI brain.
Zachariah RM; Priya PS; Pendem S
J Cancer Res Ther; 2023; 19(2):435-446. PubMed ID: 37313916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Diagnostic performance of diffusion tensor imaging for preo- perative glioma grading.
Duy Hung N; Minh Duc N; Van Anh NT; Thanh Dung L; He DV
Clin Ter; 2021 Jul; 172(4):315-321. PubMed ID: 34247214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Conventional magnetic resonance imaging-based radiomic signature predicts telomerase reverse transcriptase promoter mutation status in grade II and III gliomas.
Jiang C; Kong Z; Zhang Y; Liu S; Liu Z; Chen W; Liu P; Liu D; Wang Y; Lyu Y; Zhao D; Wang Y; You H; Feng F; Ma W
Neuroradiology; 2020 Jul; 62(7):803-813. PubMed ID: 32239241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Differentiation between high-grade gliomas and solitary brain metastases: a comparison of five diffusion-weighted MRI models.
Mao J; Zeng W; Zhang Q; Yang Z; Yan X; Zhang H; Wang M; Yang G; Zhou M; Shen J
BMC Med Imaging; 2020 Nov; 20(1):124. PubMed ID: 33228564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Automated glioma grading on conventional MRI images using deep convolutional neural networks.
Zhuge Y; Ning H; Mathen P; Cheng JY; Krauze AV; Camphausen K; Miller RW
Med Phys; 2020 Jul; 47(7):3044-3053. PubMed ID: 32277478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Differentiation of residual/recurrent gliomas from postradiation necrosis with arterial spin labeling and diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging-derived metrics.
Razek AAKA; El-Serougy L; Abdelsalam M; Gaballa G; Talaat M
Neuroradiology; 2018 Feb; 60(2):169-177. PubMed ID: 29218370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Differentiation between low-grade and high-grade glioma using combined diffusion tensor imaging metrics.
Ma L; Song ZJ
Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2013 Dec; 115(12):2489-95. PubMed ID: 24183513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Assessment of diffusion tensor imaging metrics in differentiating low-grade from high-grade gliomas.
El-Serougy L; Abdel Razek AA; Ezzat A; Eldawoody H; El-Morsy A
Neuroradiol J; 2016 Oct; 29(5):400-7. PubMed ID: 27562582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Diagnostic accuracy of MRI texture analysis for grading gliomas.
Ditmer A; Zhang B; Shujaat T; Pavlina A; Luibrand N; Gaskill-Shipley M; Vagal A
J Neurooncol; 2018 Dec; 140(3):583-589. PubMed ID: 30145731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Intergrating conventional MRI, texture analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, and susceptibility weighted imaging for glioma grading.
Su CQ; Lu SS; Han QY; Zhou MD; Hong XN
Acta Radiol; 2019 Jun; 60(6):777-787. PubMed ID: 30244590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Grading of Glioma: combined diagnostic value of amide proton transfer weighted, arterial spin labeling and diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging.
Kang XW; Xi YB; Liu TT; Wang N; Zhu YQ; Wang XR; Guo F
BMC Med Imaging; 2020 May; 20(1):50. PubMed ID: 32408867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. MRI features predict p53 status in lower-grade gliomas via a machine-learning approach.
Li Y; Qian Z; Xu K; Wang K; Fan X; Li S; Jiang T; Liu X; Wang Y
Neuroimage Clin; 2018; 17():306-311. PubMed ID: 29527478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Multi-Channel 3D Deep Feature Learning for Survival Time Prediction of Brain Tumor Patients Using Multi-Modal Neuroimages.
Nie D; Lu J; Zhang H; Adeli E; Wang J; Yu Z; Liu L; Wang Q; Wu J; Shen D
Sci Rep; 2019 Jan; 9(1):1103. PubMed ID: 30705340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Noninvasive Prediction of IDH1 Mutation and ATRX Expression Loss in Low-Grade Gliomas Using Multiparametric MR Radiomic Features.
Ren Y; Zhang X; Rui W; Pang H; Qiu T; Wang J; Xie Q; Jin T; Zhang H; Chen H; Zhang Y; Lu H; Yao Z; Zhang J; Feng X
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Mar; 49(3):808-817. PubMed ID: 30194745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Diffusion-tensor imaging for glioma grading at 3-T magnetic resonance imaging: analysis of fractional anisotropy and mean diffusivity.
Lee HY; Na DG; Song IC; Lee DH; Seo HS; Kim JH; Chang KH
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2008; 32(2):298-303. PubMed ID: 18379322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Glioma grading using a machine-learning framework based on optimized features obtained from T
Sengupta A; Ramaniharan AK; Gupta RK; Agarwal S; Singh A
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Oct; 50(4):1295-1306. PubMed ID: 30895704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The Value of Enhanced MR Radiomics in Estimating the IDH1 Genotype in High-Grade Gliomas.
Niu L; Feng WH; Duan CF; Liu YC; Liu JH; Liu XJ
Biomed Res Int; 2020; 2020():4630218. PubMed ID: 33163535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Quantitative vs. semiquantitative assessment of intratumoral susceptibility signals in patients with different grades of glioma.
Bhattacharjee R; Gupta RK; Patir R; Vaishya S; Ahlawat S; Singh A
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 Jan; 51(1):225-233. PubMed ID: 31087724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Radiomics Analysis for Glioma Malignancy Evaluation Using Diffusion Kurtosis and Tensor Imaging.
Takahashi S; Takahashi W; Tanaka S; Haga A; Nakamoto T; Suzuki Y; Mukasa A; Takayanagi S; Kitagawa Y; Hana T; Nejo T; Nomura M; Nakagawa K; Saito N
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2019 Nov; 105(4):784-791. PubMed ID: 31344432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
