152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32040726)
1. Physical evaluation of an ultra-high-resolution CT scanner.
Oostveen LJ; Boedeker KL; Brink M; Prokop M; de Lange F; Sechopoulos I
Eur Radiol; 2020 May; 30(5):2552-2560. PubMed ID: 32040726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validation of synthesized normal-resolution image data generated from high-resolution acquisitions on a commercial CT scanner.
Hernandez AM; Shin DW; Abbey CK; Seibert JA; Akino N; Goto T; Vaishnav JY; Boedeker KL; Boone JM
Med Phys; 2020 Oct; 47(10):4775-4785. PubMed ID: 32677085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Location and direction dependence in the 3D MTF for a high-resolution CT system.
Hernandez AM; Wu P; Mahesh M; Siewerdsen JH; Boone JM
Med Phys; 2021 Jun; 48(6):2760-2771. PubMed ID: 33608927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of lung CT number and airway dimension evaluation capabilities of ultra-high-resolution CT, using different scan modes and reconstruction methods including deep learning reconstruction, with those of multi-detector CT in a QIBA phantom study.
Ohno Y; Akino N; Fujisawa Y; Kimata H; Ito Y; Fujii K; Kataoka Y; Ida Y; Oshima Y; Hamabuchi N; Shigemura C; Watanabe A; Obama Y; Hanamatsu S; Ueda T; Ikeda H; Murayama K; Toyama H
Eur Radiol; 2023 Jan; 33(1):368-379. PubMed ID: 35841417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Deep learning-based reconstruction in ultra-high-resolution computed tomography: Can image noise caused by high definition detector and the miniaturization of matrix element size be improved?
Urikura A; Yoshida T; Nakaya Y; Nishimaru E; Hara T; Endo M
Phys Med; 2021 Jan; 81():121-129. PubMed ID: 33453504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Development and performance evaluation of an experimental fine pitch detector multislice CT scanner.
Imai Y; Nukui M; Ishihara Y; Fujishige T; Ogata K; Moritake M; Kurochi H; Ogata T; Yahata M; Tang X
Med Phys; 2009 Apr; 36(4):1120-7. PubMed ID: 19472617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Improvement of Image Quality in the Axial Section Using High-resolution Scan Mode and Hybrid Iterative Reconstruction in Ultra-high-resolution Computed Tomography].
Sakai Y; Shirasaka T; Kondo M; Hamasaki H; Mikayama R; Matsumoto R; Hioki K; Onizuka Y; Yoshikawa H
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2018 Dec; 74(12):1419-1427. PubMed ID: 30568092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Hi-Res scan mode in clinical MDCT systems: Experimental assessment of spatial resolution performance.
Cruz-Bastida JP; Gomez-Cardona D; Li K; Sun H; Hsieh J; Szczykutowicz TP; Chen GH
Med Phys; 2016 May; 43(5):2399. PubMed ID: 27147351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Performance of Ultra-High-Resolution Computed Tomography in Super High-Resolution Mode at the Routine Radiation Dose: Phantom Study.
Kitera N; Fujioka C; Higaki T; Nishimaru E; Yokomachi K; Kiguchi M; Awai K
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2022 Nov-Dec 01; 46(6):900-905. PubMed ID: 35723670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effective Spatial Resolution of Photon Counting CT for Imaging of Trabecular Structures is Superior to Conventional Clinical CT and Similar to High Resolution Peripheral CT.
Thomsen FSL; Horstmeier S; Niehoff JH; Peña JA; Borggrefe J
Invest Radiol; 2022 Sep; 57(9):620-626. PubMed ID: 35318968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In vitro high-resolution flat-panel computed tomographic arthrography for artificial cartilage defect detection: comparison with multidetector computed tomography.
Guggenberger R; Winklhofer S; Spiczak JV; Andreisek G; Alkadhi H
Invest Radiol; 2013 Aug; 48(8):614-21. PubMed ID: 23538888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of Ultra-High-Resolution CT on Pseudoenhancement in Renal Cysts: A Phantom Experiment and Clinical Study.
Hamabe F; Mikoshi A; Edo H; Sugiura H; Okano K; Yamada Y; Jinzaki M; Shinmoto H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 Oct; 219(4):624-633. PubMed ID: 35583427
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Image quality of conventional images of dual-layer SPECTRAL CT: A phantom study.
van Ommen F; Bennink E; Vlassenbroek A; Dankbaar JW; Schilham AMR; Viergever MA; de Jong HWAM
Med Phys; 2018 Jul; 45(7):3031-3042. PubMed ID: 29749624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Improved image quality of temporal bone CT with an ultrahigh-resolution CT scanner: clinical pilot studies.
Ohara A; Machida H; Shiga H; Yamamura W; Yokoyama K
Jpn J Radiol; 2020 Sep; 38(9):878-883. PubMed ID: 32394364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Technical Note: Performance comparison of ultra-high-resolution scan modes of two clinical computed tomography systems.
Kawashima H; Ichikawa K; Takata T; Nagata H; Hoshika M; Akagi N
Med Phys; 2020 Feb; 47(2):488-497. PubMed ID: 31808550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Performance of cone-beam computed tomography and multidetector computed tomography in diagnostic imaging of the midface: A comparative study on Phantom and cadaver head scans.
Veldhoen S; Schöllchen M; Hanken H; Precht C; Henes FO; Schön G; Nagel HD; Schumacher U; Heiland M; Adam G; Regier M
Eur Radiol; 2017 Feb; 27(2):790-800. PubMed ID: 27169574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The influence of focal spot blooming on high-contrast spatial resolution in CT imaging.
Grimes J; Duan X; Yu L; Halaweish AF; Haag N; Leng S; McCollough C
Med Phys; 2015 Oct; 42(10):6011-20. PubMed ID: 26429276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of scan mode and focal spot size in airway dimension measurements for ultra-high-resolution computed tomography of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A COPDGene phantom study.
Mikayama R; Shirasaka T; Yabuuchi H; Sakai Y; Kojima T; Kondo M; Yoshikawa H; Kato T
Phys Med; 2020 Feb; 70():102-108. PubMed ID: 32004765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Characteristic image quality of a third generation dual-source MDCT scanner: Noise, resolution, and detectability.
Solomon J; Wilson J; Samei E
Med Phys; 2015 Aug; 42(8):4941-53. PubMed ID: 26233220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of CT parameters on the physical quantities related to image quality for two MDCT scanners using the ACR accreditation phantom: A phantom study.
Alikhani B; Jamali L; Raatschen HJ; Wacker F; Werncke T
Radiography (Lond); 2017 Aug; 23(3):202-210. PubMed ID: 28687287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
