152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32040726)
21. Performance evaluation of an 85-cm-bore X-ray computed tomography scanner designed for radiation oncology and comparison with current diagnostic CT scanners.
Garcia-Ramirez JL; Mutic S; Dempsey JF; Low DA; Purdy JA
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2002 Mar; 52(4):1123-31. PubMed ID: 11958910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Image quality dependence on in-plane positions and directions for MDCT images.
Hara T; Ichikawa K; Sanada S; Ida Y
Eur J Radiol; 2010 Jul; 75(1):114-21. PubMed ID: 19410407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Physical performance evaluation of a 256-slice CT-scanner for four-dimensional imaging.
Mori S; Endo M; Tsunoo T; Kandatsu S; Tanada S; Aradate H; Saito Y; Miyazaki H; Satoh K; Matsushita S; Kusakabe M
Med Phys; 2004 Jun; 31(6):1348-56. PubMed ID: 15259638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Cochlear Implant Electrode Localization Using an Ultra-High Resolution Scan Mode on Conventional 64-Slice and New Generation 192-Slice Multi-Detector Computed Tomography.
Carlson ML; Leng S; Diehn FE; Witte RJ; Krecke KN; Grimes J; Koeller KK; Bruesewitz MR; McCollough CH; Lane JI
Otol Neurotol; 2017 Aug; 38(7):978-984. PubMed ID: 28570418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Deep Learning Reconstruction at CT: Phantom Study of the Image Characteristics.
Higaki T; Nakamura Y; Zhou J; Yu Z; Nemoto T; Tatsugami F; Awai K
Acad Radiol; 2020 Jan; 27(1):82-87. PubMed ID: 31818389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Dose and image quality evaluation of a dedicated cone-beam CT system for high-contrast neurologic applications.
Yu L; Vrieze TJ; Bruesewitz MR; Kofler JM; DeLone DR; Pallanch JF; Lindell EP; McCollough CH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Feb; 194(2):W193-201. PubMed ID: 20093573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Measurement of coronary artery calcium volume using ultra-high-resolution computed tomography: A preliminary phantom and cadaver study.
Fukumoto W; Nagaoka M; Higaki T; Tatsugami F; Nakamura Y; Oostveen L; Klein W; Prokop M; Awai K
Eur J Radiol Open; 2020; 7():100253. PubMed ID: 32964073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Technical assessment of a cone-beam CT scanner for otolaryngology imaging: image quality, dose, and technique protocols.
Xu J; Reh DD; Carey JP; Mahesh M; Siewerdsen JH
Med Phys; 2012 Aug; 39(8):4932-42. PubMed ID: 22894419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Novel ultrahigh resolution data acquisition and image reconstruction for multi-detector row CT.
Flohr TG; Stierstorfer K; Süss C; Schmidt B; Primak AN; McCollough CH
Med Phys; 2007 May; 34(5):1712-23. PubMed ID: 17555253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Characteristics and clinical application of a treatment simulator with Ct-option.
Verellen D; Vinh-Hung V; Bijdekerke P; Nijs F; Linthout N; Bel A; Storme G
Radiother Oncol; 1999 Mar; 50(3):355-66. PubMed ID: 10392823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. 64 slice MDCT generally underestimates coronary calcium scores as compared to EBT: a phantom study.
Greuter MJ; Dijkstra H; Groen JM; Vliegenthart R; de Lange F; Renema WK; de Bock GH; Oudkerk M
Med Phys; 2007 Sep; 34(9):3510-9. PubMed ID: 17926954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Performance evaluation of a multi-slice CT system.
McCollough CH; Zink FE
Med Phys; 1999 Nov; 26(11):2223-30. PubMed ID: 10587202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A novel objective method for assessing high-contrast spatial resolution in CT based on the Rayleigh criterion.
Zhang P; Wan G; Li F; Li X; Liu W; Wang G
Med Phys; 2017 Feb; 44(2):460-469. PubMed ID: 28019671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Design and performance characteristics of a digital flat-panel computed tomography system.
Ross W; Cody DD; Hazle JD
Med Phys; 2006 Jun; 33(6):1888-901. PubMed ID: 16872096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Image reconstruction and image quality evaluation for a 64-slice CT scanner with z-flying focal spot.
Flohr TG; Stierstorfer K; Ulzheimer S; Bruder H; Primak AN; McCollough CH
Med Phys; 2005 Aug; 32(8):2536-47. PubMed ID: 16193784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. An evaluation of spatial resolution of a prototype proton CT scanner.
Plautz TE; Bashkirov V; Giacometti V; Hurley RF; Johnson RP; Piersimoni P; Sadrozinski HF; Schulte RW; Zatserklyaniy A
Med Phys; 2016 Dec; 43(12):6291. PubMed ID: 27908179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Determination of the weighted CT dose index in modern multi-detector CT scanners.
Perisinakis K; Damilakis J; Tzedakis A; Papadakis A; Theocharopoulos N; Gourtsoyiannis N
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Nov; 52(21):6485-95. PubMed ID: 17951857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Assessment of longitudinal beam property and contrast uniformity for 256- and 320-row area detector computed tomography scanners in the 160-mm nonhelical volume-acquisition mode.
Hara T; Niwa S; Urikura A; Matsubara K; Hoshino T; Nishimaru E; Taniguchi T
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Aug; 20(8):164-170. PubMed ID: 31254457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Spatial resolution improvement and dose reduction potential for inner ear CT imaging using a z-axis deconvolution technique.
McCollough CH; Leng S; Sunnegardh J; Vrieze TJ; Yu L; Lane J; Raupach R; Stierstorfer K; Flohr T
Med Phys; 2013 Jun; 40(6):061904. PubMed ID: 23718595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Objective comparison of high-contrast spatial resolution and low-contrast detectability for various clinical protocols on multiple CT scanners.
Racine D; Viry A; Becce F; Schmidt S; Ba A; Bochud FO; Edyvean S; Schegerer A; Verdun FR
Med Phys; 2017 Sep; 44(9):e153-e163. PubMed ID: 28901621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
