These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

358 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32040759)

  • 1. Transcriptome analysis of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) in response to alkaline stress.
    Zou C; Liu D; Wu P; Wang Y; Gai Z; Liu L; Yang F; Li C; Guo G
    Plant Mol Biol; 2020 Apr; 102(6):645-657. PubMed ID: 32040759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Transcriptomic and metabolomic analyses reveal mechanisms of adaptation to salinity in which carbon and nitrogen metabolism is altered in sugar beet roots.
    Liu L; Wang B; Liu D; Zou C; Wu P; Wang Z; Wang Y; Li C
    BMC Plant Biol; 2020 Apr; 20(1):138. PubMed ID: 32245415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. De novo transcriptome assembly and identification of salt-responsive genes in sugar beet M14.
    Lv X; Jin Y; Wang Y
    Comput Biol Chem; 2018 Aug; 75():1-10. PubMed ID: 29705503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Transcriptome and Metabolome Analyses Revealed the Response Mechanism of Sugar Beet to Salt Stress of Different Durations.
    Cui J; Li J; Dai C; Li L
    Int J Mol Sci; 2022 Aug; 23(17):. PubMed ID: 36076993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Salt stress vs. salt shock - the case of sugar beet and its halophytic ancestor.
    Skorupa M; Gołębiewski M; Kurnik K; Niedojadło J; Kęsy J; Klamkowski K; Wójcik K; Treder W; Tretyn A; Tyburski J
    BMC Plant Biol; 2019 Feb; 19(1):57. PubMed ID: 30727960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Transcriptome Analysis of Salt-Sensitive and Tolerant Genotypes Reveals Salt-Tolerance Metabolic Pathways in Sugar Beet.
    Geng G; Lv C; Stevanato P; Li R; Liu H; Yu L; Wang Y
    Int J Mol Sci; 2019 Nov; 20(23):. PubMed ID: 31775274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Analysis of differentially expressed genes and adaptive mechanisms of
    Liu J; Wang Y; Li Q
    Hereditas; 2017; 154():10. PubMed ID: 28484361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Transcriptome analysis of two contrasting rice cultivars during alkaline stress.
    Li N; Liu H; Sun J; Zheng H; Wang J; Yang L; Zhao H; Zou D
    Sci Rep; 2018 Jun; 8(1):9586. PubMed ID: 29941956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Transcript profiles uncover temporal and stress-induced changes of metabolic pathways in germinating sugar beet seeds.
    Pestsova E; Meinhard J; Menze A; Fischer U; Windhövel A; Westhoff P
    BMC Plant Biol; 2008 Dec; 8():122. PubMed ID: 19046420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Whole-Transcriptome RNA Sequencing Reveals the Global Molecular Responses and CeRNA Regulatory Network of mRNAs, lncRNAs, miRNAs and circRNAs in Response to Salt Stress in Sugar Beet (
    Li J; Cui J; Dai C; Liu T; Cheng D; Luo C
    Int J Mol Sci; 2020 Dec; 22(1):. PubMed ID: 33396637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Physiological and Transcriptome Analysis of Sugar Beet Reveals Different Mechanisms of Response to Neutral Salt and Alkaline Salt Stresses.
    Geng G; Li R; Stevanato P; Lv C; Lu Z; Yu L; Wang Y
    Front Plant Sci; 2020; 11():571864. PubMed ID: 33193507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Integration of mRNA and miRNA analysis reveals the molecular mechanisms of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) response to salt stress.
    Zhang Z; Wang L; Chen W; Fu Z; Zhao S; E Y; Zhang H; Zhang B; Sun M; Han P; Chang Y; Tang K; Gao Y; Zhang H; Li X; Zheng W
    Sci Rep; 2023 Dec; 13(1):22074. PubMed ID: 38086906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Early transcriptional changes in Beta vulgaris in response to low temperature.
    Moliterni VM; Paris R; Onofri C; Orrù L; Cattivelli L; Pacifico D; Avanzato C; Ferrarini A; Delledonne M; Mandolino G
    Planta; 2015 Jul; 242(1):187-201. PubMed ID: 25893871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Transcriptomic profiling of the salt stress response in excised leaves of the halophyte Beta vulgaris ssp. maritima.
    Skorupa M; Gołębiewski M; Domagalski K; Kurnik K; Abu Nahia K; Złoch M; Tretyn A; Tyburski J
    Plant Sci; 2016 Feb; 243():56-70. PubMed ID: 26795151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Key Maize Drought-Responsive Genes and Pathways Revealed by Comparative Transcriptome and Physiological Analyses of Contrasting Inbred Lines.
    Zenda T; Liu S; Wang X; Liu G; Jin H; Dong A; Yang Y; Duan H
    Int J Mol Sci; 2019 Mar; 20(6):. PubMed ID: 30871211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Low nitrogen stress-induced transcriptome changes revealed the molecular response and tolerance characteristics in maintaining the C/N balance of sugar beet (
    Li J; Liu X; Xu L; Li W; Yao Q; Yin X; Wang Q; Tan W; Xing W; Liu D
    Front Plant Sci; 2023; 14():1164151. PubMed ID: 37152145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Salt stress induced proteome and transcriptome changes in sugar beet monosomic addition line M14.
    Yang L; Ma C; Wang L; Chen S; Li H
    J Plant Physiol; 2012 Jun; 169(9):839-50. PubMed ID: 22498239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative transcriptome analysis of two rice genotypes differing in their tolerance to saline-alkaline stress.
    Li Q; Ma C; Tai H; Qiu H; Yang A
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(12):e0243112. PubMed ID: 33259539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Transcriptome Analysis of Beta macrocarpa and Identification of Differentially Expressed Transcripts in Response to Beet Necrotic Yellow Vein Virus Infection.
    Fan H; Zhang Y; Sun H; Liu J; Wang Y; Wang X; Li D; Yu J; Han C
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0132277. PubMed ID: 26196682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Analysis of N
    Li J; Wang J; Pang Q; Yan X
    Plant Sci; 2023 Oct; 335():111794. PubMed ID: 37459955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.