These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32041518)

  • 1. The predictive ability of indirect genetic models is reduced when culled animals are omitted from the data.
    Ask B; Christensen OF; Heidaritabar M; Madsen P; Nielsen HM
    Genet Sel Evol; 2020 Feb; 52(1):8. PubMed ID: 32041518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prediction of genetic merit for growth rate in pigs using animal models with indirect genetic effects and genomic information.
    Poulsen BG; Ask B; Nielsen HM; Ostersen T; Christensen OF
    Genet Sel Evol; 2020 Oct; 52(1):58. PubMed ID: 33028188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Indirect genetic effect model using feeding behaviour traits to define the degree of interaction between mates: an implementation in pigs growth rate.
    Ragab M; Piles M; Quintanilla R; Sánchez JP
    Animal; 2019 Feb; 13(2):231-239. PubMed ID: 29871710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of pen mates on growth, backfat depth, and longissimus muscle area of swine.
    Hsu WL; Johnson RK; Van Vleck LD
    J Anim Sci; 2010 Mar; 88(3):895-902. PubMed ID: 19933426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Estimation of genetic parameters for average daily gain using models with competition effects.
    Chen CY; Kachman SD; Johnson RK; Newman S; Van Vleck LD
    J Anim Sci; 2008 Oct; 86(10):2525-30. PubMed ID: 18539840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of genomic prediction using deregressed breeding values estimated from purebred and crossbred offspring phenotypes in pigs.
    Hidalgo AM; Bastiaansen JW; Lopes MS; Veroneze R; Groenen MA; de Koning DJ
    J Anim Sci; 2015 Jul; 93(7):3313-21. PubMed ID: 26440000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Estimation of variance components and prediction of breeding values based on group records from varying group sizes.
    Su G; Madsen P; Nielsen B; Ostersen T; Shirali M; Jensen J; Christensen OF
    Genet Sel Evol; 2018 Aug; 50(1):42. PubMed ID: 30107792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Full sib pens of pigs are not suitable to identify variance component of associative effect: a simulation study using Gibbs Sampling.
    Cheng J; Janssens S; Buys N
    BMC Genet; 2009 Feb; 10():9. PubMed ID: 19250536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Genomic selection in a pig population including information from slaughtered full sibs of boars within a sib-testing program.
    Samorè AB; Buttazzoni L; Gallo M; Russo V; Fontanesi L
    Animal; 2015 May; 9(5):750-9. PubMed ID: 25510405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Maternal effects on traits measured during postweaning performance test of swine from four breeds.
    Johnson ZB; Chewning JJ; Nugent RA
    J Anim Sci; 2002 Jun; 80(6):1470-7. PubMed ID: 12078726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Direct and social genetic effects on body weight at 270 days and carcass and ham quality traits in heavy pigs.
    Rostellato R; Sartori C; Bonfatti V; Chiarot G; Carnier P
    J Anim Sci; 2015 Jan; 93(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 25412749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Heritability of body length and measures of body density and their relationship to backfat thickness and loin muscle area in swine.
    Johnson ZB; Nugent RA
    J Anim Sci; 2003 Aug; 81(8):1943-9. PubMed ID: 12926776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Social genetic effects for growth in pigs differ between boars and gilts.
    Nielsen HM; Ask B; Madsen P
    Genet Sel Evol; 2018 Feb; 50(1):4. PubMed ID: 29390956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Efficiency of an approximate animal model for maternal and direct genetic effects of litter size in swine.
    Roehe R; Kennedy BW
    J Anim Sci; 1993 Dec; 71(12):3251-60. PubMed ID: 8294276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluating the removal of pigs from a group and subsequent floor space allowance on the growth performance of heavy-weight finishing pigs.
    Flohr JR; Tokach MD; DeRouchey JM; Woodworth JC; Goodband RD; Dritz SS
    J Anim Sci; 2016 Oct; 94(10):4388-4400. PubMed ID: 27898847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Phenotypic and genetic variation in longevity of Polish Landrace sows.
    Sobczyńska M; Blicharski T
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2015 Aug; 132(4):318-27. PubMed ID: 25882772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of social interactions on empirical responses to selection for average daily gain of boars.
    Chen CY; Johnson RK; Newman S; Kachman SD; Van Vleck LD
    J Anim Sci; 2009 Mar; 87(3):844-9. PubMed ID: 18997079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Estimation of variance components including competitive effects of Large White growing gilts.
    Arango J; Misztal I; Tsuruta S; Culbertson M; Herring W
    J Anim Sci; 2005 Jun; 83(6):1241-6. PubMed ID: 15890801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of performance-tested boars using a single-trait animal model.
    Wood CM; Christian LL; Rothschild MF
    J Anim Sci; 1991 Aug; 69(8):3144-55. PubMed ID: 1894549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Boar taint in entire male pigs: a genomewide association study for direct and indirect genetic effects on androstenone.
    Duijvesteijn N; Knol EF; Bijma P
    J Anim Sci; 2014 Oct; 92(10):4319-28. PubMed ID: 25149343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.