168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32041661)
61. Direct-to-Implant Subcutaneous Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review of Complications and Patient's Quality of Life.
Silva J; Carvalho F; Marques M
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2023 Feb; 47(1):92-105. PubMed ID: 36097081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Short-term safety outcomes of mastectomy and immediate prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction: Pre-BRA prospective multicentre cohort study.
Harvey KL; Sinai P; Mills N; White P; Holcombe C; Potter S;
Br J Surg; 2022 May; 109(6):530-538. PubMed ID: 35576373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction.
Graziano FD; Lu J; Sbitany H
Clin Plast Surg; 2023 Apr; 50(2):235-242. PubMed ID: 36813401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. An Algorithmic Approach to Prepectoral Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction: Version 2.0.
Antony AK; Robinson EC
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2019 May; 143(5):1311-1319. PubMed ID: 31033812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Direct-to-Implant Extracellular Matrix Hammock-based Breast Reconstruction; Prepectoral or Subpectoral?
Dyrberg DL; Gunnarsson GL; Bille C; Sørensen JA; Thomsen JB
Trials; 2020 Feb; 21(1):160. PubMed ID: 32041661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Prepectoral implant placement and complete coverage with porcine acellular dermal matrix: a new technique for direct-to-implant breast reconstruction after nipple-sparing mastectomy.
Reitsamer R; Peintinger F
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2015 Feb; 68(2):162-7. PubMed ID: 25455288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Prepectoral Revision Breast Reconstruction for Treatment of Implant-Associated Animation Deformity: A Review of 102 Reconstructions.
Gabriel A; Sigalove S; Sigalove NM; Storm-Dickerson TL; Rice J; Pope N; Maxwell GP
Aesthet Surg J; 2018 Apr; 38(5):519-526. PubMed ID: 29365064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Acellular Dermal Matrix-sparing Direct-to-implant Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: A Comparative Study Including Cost Analysis.
Viezel-Mathieu A; Alnaif N; Aljerian A; Safran T; Brabant G; Boileau JF; Dionisopoulos T
Ann Plast Surg; 2020 Feb; 84(2):139-143. PubMed ID: 31335468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Prepectoral Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction: Safety Outcome Endpoints and Delineation of Risk Factors.
Nealon KP; Weitzman RE; Sobti N; Gadd M; Specht M; Jimenez RB; Ehrlichman R; Faulkner HR; Austen WG; Liao EC
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2020 May; 145(5):898e-908e. PubMed ID: 32332523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. A Prospective Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes of Subpectoral and Prepectoral Strattice-Based Immediate Breast Reconstruction.
Baker BG; Irri R; MacCallum V; Chattopadhyay R; Murphy J; Harvey JR
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2018 May; 141(5):1077-1084. PubMed ID: 29697602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. A simple clinical assessment of breast animation deformity following direct-to-implant breast reconstruction.
Dyrberg DL; Gunnarsson GL; Bille C; Sørensen JA; Thomsen JB
Arch Plast Surg; 2019 Nov; 46(6):535-543. PubMed ID: 31775206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Prepectoral Hammock and Direct-to-implant Breast Reconstruction in 10 Minutes: A Focus on Technique.
Gunnarsson GL; Thomsen JB
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open; 2018 Oct; 6(10):e1931. PubMed ID: 30534491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Direct-to-implant breast reconstruction: Higher complication rate vs cosmetic benefits.
Gschwantler-Kaulich D; Leser C; Salama M; Singer CF
Breast J; 2018 Nov; 24(6):957-964. PubMed ID: 30230119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. The Impact of Animation Deformity on Quality of Life in Post-Mastectomy Reconstruction Patients.
Becker H; Fregosi N
Aesthet Surg J; 2017 May; 37(5):531-536. PubMed ID: 28158447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Acellular Dermal Matrix-Assisted Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction and Capsular Contracture: A 13-Year Experience.
Salzberg CA; Ashikari AY; Berry C; Hunsicker LM
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2016 Aug; 138(2):329-337. PubMed ID: 27064232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Implant-based breast reconstruction following conservative mastectomy: one-stage vs. two-stage approach.
Nahabedian MY
Gland Surg; 2016 Feb; 5(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 26855908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
78.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
79.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
80.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
