These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32043921)

  • 21. Formative self-assessment using multiple true-false questions on the Internet: feedback according to confidence about correct knowledge.
    Khan KS; Davies DA; Gupta JK
    Med Teach; 2001 Mar; 23(2):158-163. PubMed ID: 11371292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The influence of trial order on learning from reward vs. punishment in a probabilistic categorization task: experimental and computational analyses.
    Moustafa AA; Gluck MA; Herzallah MM; Myers CE
    Front Behav Neurosci; 2015; 9():153. PubMed ID: 26257616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Presence and place of main ideas and examples in study texts.
    Beishuizen J; Asscher J; Prinsen F; Elshout-Mohr M
    Br J Educ Psychol; 2003 Sep; 73(Pt 3):291-316. PubMed ID: 14672145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Do worked examples foster medical students' diagnostic knowledge of hyperthyroidism?
    Kopp V; Stark R; Kühne-Eversmann L; Fischer MR
    Med Educ; 2009 Dec; 43(12):1210-7. PubMed ID: 19930513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Memory and truth: correcting errors with true feedback versus overwriting correct answers with errors.
    Metcalfe J; Eich TS
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2019 Feb; 4(1):4. PubMed ID: 30758685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The effect of feedback delay and feedback type on perceptual category learning: the limits of multiple systems.
    Dunn JC; Newell BR; Kalish ML
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Jul; 38(4):840-59. PubMed ID: 22746952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Implementation and evaluation of a multivariate abstraction-based, interval-based dynamic time-warping method as a similarity measure for longitudinal medical records.
    Lion M; Shahar Y
    J Biomed Inform; 2021 Nov; 123():103919. PubMed ID: 34628062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. When more is less: feedback effects in perceptual category learning.
    Maddox WT; Love BC; Glass BD; Filoteo JV
    Cognition; 2008 Aug; 108(2):578-89. PubMed ID: 18455155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Fostering diagnostic knowledge through computer-supported, case-based worked examples: effects of erroneous examples and feedback.
    Kopp V; Stark R; Fischer MR
    Med Educ; 2008 Aug; 42(8):823-9. PubMed ID: 18564096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [The effects of self-evaluative responses with feedback in learning].
    Ishida S
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 1987 Feb; 57(6):372-8. PubMed ID: 3613299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Optimizing multiple-choice tests as tools for learning.
    Little JL; Bjork EL
    Mem Cognit; 2015 Jan; 43(1):14-26. PubMed ID: 25123774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effects of frequency of feedback on transfer in concept identification.
    Schroth ML
    Am J Psychol; 1997; 110(1):71-9. PubMed ID: 9100341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Using verification feedback to correct errors made on a multiple-choice test.
    Marsh EJ; Lozito JP; Umanath S; Bjork EL; Bjork RA
    Memory; 2012; 20(6):645-53. PubMed ID: 22640417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Differing effects of gain and loss feedback on rule-based and information-integration category learning.
    Liu Z; Zhang Y; Ma D; Xu Q; Seger CA
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2021 Feb; 28(1):274-282. PubMed ID: 33006121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluative feedback delivery and the factors that affect success.
    Azzam T; Whyte CE
    Eval Program Plann; 2018 Apr; 67():148-159. PubMed ID: 29331384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Belief in corrective feedback for common misconceptions: Implications for knowledge revision.
    Rich PR; Van Loon MH; Dunlosky J; Zaragoza MS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Mar; 43(3):492-501. PubMed ID: 27762579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Metacognitive monitoring during category learning: how success affects future behaviour.
    Doyle ME; Hourihan KL
    Memory; 2016 Oct; 24(9):1197-207. PubMed ID: 26377626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. "Just letting you know … " Underestimating others' desire for constructive feedback.
    Abi-Esber N; Abel JE; Schroeder J; Gino F
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2022 Dec; 123(6):1362-1385. PubMed ID: 35324242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The impact of feedback during formative testing on study behaviour and performance of (bio)medical students: a randomised controlled study.
    Thijssen DHJ; Hopman MTE; van Wijngaarden MT; Hoenderop JGJ; Bindels RJM; Eijsvogels TMH
    BMC Med Educ; 2019 Apr; 19(1):97. PubMed ID: 30943962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.