These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32044262)

  • 21. Urology Match Outcomes during the Coronavirus Pandemic.
    Patel SR; Mayer WA; Taylor JM
    J Urol; 2021 Aug; 206(2):194-196. PubMed ID: 33780285
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Improving the Residency Program Virtual Open House Experience: A Survey of Urology Applicants.
    Jiang J; Key P; Deibert CM
    Urology; 2020 Dec; 146():1-3. PubMed ID: 33049230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The Urology Match and Postinterview Communication.
    Farber NJ; Neylan CJ; Kaplan A; Singer EA; Elsamra SE
    Urology; 2018 Dec; 122():44-51. PubMed ID: 29935262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Urology Residency Match in Singapore.
    Tan YQ; Pek XWG; Wang Z; Tiong HY; Chiong E
    Urology; 2020 Sep; 143():272-273. PubMed ID: 32504688
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The Role of Geography in the AUA Residency Match.
    Anwar T; Wakefield M; Murray KS
    J Urol; 2020 Jun; 203(6):1070-1071. PubMed ID: 32202460
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Trends in matching to urology residency in Canada: are we becoming noncompetitive?
    Melnyk M; Nelson H; Mickelson J; Macneily AE
    J Surg Educ; 2013; 70(4):537-43. PubMed ID: 23725943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Prevalence of Research Publication Misrepresentation Among Urology Residency Applicants and Its Effect on Match Success.
    Pak JS; Pagano MJ; Cooper KL; McKiernan JM; Badalato GM
    Urology; 2017 Jan; 99():5-9. PubMed ID: 27751726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The Urology Match Process and the Limited Value of Post-Interview Communication for Program Directors.
    Farber NJ; Neylan CJ; Srivastava A; Pandya SS; Kaplan A; Radadia KD; Singer EA; Elsamra SE
    Urology; 2019 Jun; 128():23-30. PubMed ID: 30844386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Flexibility in urology residency education.
    Schaeffer AJ
    J Urol; 2009 Jul; 182(1):8-9. PubMed ID: 19450855
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Otolaryngology Match Trends: Considerations for Proper Data Interpretation.
    Bowe SN; Roy S; Chang CWD
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2020 Aug; 163(2):185-187. PubMed ID: 32663103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Women in Urology Residency, 1978-2013: A Critical Look at Gender Representation in Our Specialty.
    Halpern JA; Lee UJ; Wolff EM; Mittal S; Shoag JE; Lightner DJ; Kim S; Hu JC; Chughtai B; Lee RK
    Urology; 2016 Jun; 92():20-5. PubMed ID: 26952568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Improving The Match: Use of Preference Signaling to Optimize the Urology Match Interview Process.
    Fantasia J; Elsamra S; Thavaseelan S
    Urology; 2021 Aug; 154():57-61. PubMed ID: 33545207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Trends in Female Representation in Urology Residency: Impact on Workforce Projections.
    Koo K; North AC; Granberg CF
    Urology; 2021 Jan; 147():324-326. PubMed ID: 33217451
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Response to "Trends in Female Representation in Urology Residency: Impact on Workforce Projections".
    Nam CS; Daignault-Newton S; Herrel LA; Kraft KH
    Urology; 2021 Jan; 147():326. PubMed ID: 33217452
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Contemporary Assessment of Match Violations within Urology: an Opportunity for Ethical Leadership.
    Balen A; Fantasia J; Thavaseelan S
    Curr Urol Rep; 2019 Sep; 20(10):65. PubMed ID: 31493164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Defining the Current Landscape of Women in Urology: An Analysis of Female Applicants, Residents, and Faculty at AUA-Accredited Residency Programs.
    Findlay BL; Manka MG; Bole R; Dodge NA; Thompson RH; Granberg CF
    Urology; 2021 Feb; 148():59-63. PubMed ID: 33301743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. USMLE Step 1 Scoring Changes and the Urology Residency Application Process: Program Directors' Perspectives.
    Chisholm LP; Drolet BC
    Urology; 2020 Nov; 145():79-82. PubMed ID: 32882303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Urology and the core curriculum: The current status and controversies of the urology residency in Europe and Spain.
    Vela-Navarrete R; Cortiñas JA; Cózar JM
    Actas Urol Esp; 2016 Apr; 40(3):135-8. PubMed ID: 26655767
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Standardized Letters of Recommendation and Success in the Urology Match.
    Nabavizadeh B; Hakam N; Shaw NM; Hampson LA; Penson DF; Breyer BN
    Urology; 2022 Aug; 166():95-97. PubMed ID: 35038486
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Content Analysis of ACGME Accredited Urology Residency Program Webpages.
    Patel BG; Gallo K; Cherullo EE; Chow AK
    Urology; 2020 Apr; 138():11-15. PubMed ID: 31954168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.