These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
23. Decoupling of N and P aggravated upward along food chains in an urban river ecosystem. An S; Yan Z; Song Y; Fu Q; Ge F; Wu Z; An W; Han W Chemosphere; 2023 Feb; 313():137555. PubMed ID: 36526137 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Stoichiometry in producer-grazer systems: linking energy flow with element cycling. Loladze I; Kuang Y; Elser JJ Bull Math Biol; 2000 Nov; 62(6):1137-62. PubMed ID: 11127517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Modeling and analysis of stoichiometric two-patch consumer-resource systems. Miller CR; Kuang Y; Fagan WF; Elser JJ Math Biosci; 2004 Jun; 189(2):153-84. PubMed ID: 15094318 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Variable nutrient stoichiometry (carbon:nitrogen:phosphorus) across trophic levels determines community and ecosystem properties in an oligotrophic mangrove system. Scharler UM; Ulanowicz RE; Fogel ML; Wooller MJ; Jacobson-Meyers ME; Lovelock CE; Feller IC; Frischer M; Lee R; McKee K; Romero IC; Schmit JP; Shearer C Oecologia; 2015 Nov; 179(3):863-76. PubMed ID: 26183835 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Enrichment in a stoichiometric model of two producers and one consumer. Lin LH; Peckham BB; Stech HW; Pastor J J Biol Dyn; 2012; 6():97-116. PubMed ID: 22873582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Exploring the role of spatial and stoichiometric heterogeneity in the top-down control in eutrophic planktonic ecosystems. Sandhu SK; Morozov A; Juan L J Theor Biol; 2020 Aug; 499():110311. PubMed ID: 32437709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Evolutionary history drives aspects of stoichiometric niche variation and functional effects within a guild. Atkinson CL; van Ee BC; Pfeiffer JM Ecology; 2020 Sep; 101(9):e03100. PubMed ID: 32443181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Incorporating carbon dioxide into a stoichiometric producer-grazer model. Davies CM; Wang H J Math Biol; 2021 Oct; 83(5):49. PubMed ID: 34636966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Growth and stoichiometry of a common aquatic detritivore respond to changes in resource stoichiometry. Fuller CL; Evans-White MA; Entrekin SA Oecologia; 2015 Mar; 177(3):837-848. PubMed ID: 25428786 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Dynamics of a stoichiometric producer-grazer system with seasonal effects on light level. Asik L; Kulik J; Long K; Peace A Math Biosci Eng; 2018 Dec; 16(1):501-515. PubMed ID: 30674129 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Consequences of symbiosis for food web dynamics. Kooi BW; Kuijper LD; Kooijman SA J Math Biol; 2004 Sep; 49(3):227-71. PubMed ID: 15293013 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Stoichiometry and food-chain dynamics. Kuijper LD; Kooi BW; Anderson TR; Kooijman SA Theor Popul Biol; 2004 Dec; 66(4):323-39. PubMed ID: 15560911 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Competitive coexistence in stoichiometric chaos. Deng B; Loladze I Chaos; 2007 Sep; 17(3):033108. PubMed ID: 17902990 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Model analysis of a simple aquatic ecosystems with sublethal toxic effects. Kooi BW; Bontje D; Liebig M Math Biosci Eng; 2008 Oct; 5(4):771-87. PubMed ID: 19278281 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Exploring the dynamics of a tritrophic food chain model with multiple gestation periods. Upadhyay RK; Mishra S; Dong YP; Takeuchi Y Math Biosci Eng; 2019 May; 16(5):4660-4691. PubMed ID: 31499683 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Grazers, producer stoichiometry, and the light : nutrient hypothesis revisited. Hall SR; Leibold MA; Lytle DA; Smith VH Ecology; 2007 May; 88(5):1142-52. PubMed ID: 17536401 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]