These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32044528)
1. Dissociating preferences from evaluations following subliminal conditioning. Amd M; Passarelli DA Acta Psychol (Amst); 2020 Mar; 204():103023. PubMed ID: 32044528 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Augmenting salivation, but not evaluations, through subliminal conditioning of eating-related words. Passarelli DA; Amd M; de Oliveira MA; de Rose JC Behav Processes; 2022 Jan; 194():104541. PubMed ID: 34813914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Disentangling affect from self-esteem using subliminal conditioning. Amd M Behav Processes; 2023 Nov; 213():104965. PubMed ID: 37931670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of Nodal Distance on Conditioned Stimulus Valences Across Time. Amd M; Machado A; de Oliveira MA; Passarelli DA; De Rose JC Front Psychol; 2019; 10():742. PubMed ID: 31024392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Aversive conditioning under conditions of restricted awareness: effects on spatial cueing. Raes AK; Koster EH; Van Damme S; Fias W; De Raedt R Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Dec; 63(12):2336-58. PubMed ID: 20687009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Failures to change stimulus evaluations by means of subliminal approach and avoidance training. Van Dessel P; De Houwer J; Roets A; Gast A J Pers Soc Psychol; 2016 Jan; 110(1):e1-e15. PubMed ID: 26524002 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Startle modulation and explicit valence evaluations dissociate during backward fear conditioning. Luck CC; Lipp OV Psychophysiology; 2017 May; 54(5):673-683. PubMed ID: 28169435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Is the devil in the detail? Evidence for S-S learning after unconditional stimulus revaluation in human evaluative conditioning under a broader set of experimental conditions. Jensen-Fielding H; Luck CC; Lipp OV Cogn Emot; 2018 Sep; 32(6):1275-1290. PubMed ID: 29183247 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Subliminal presentation of emotionally negative vs positive primes increases the perceived beauty of target stimuli. Era V; Candidi M; Aglioti SM Exp Brain Res; 2015 Nov; 233(11):3271-81. PubMed ID: 26238406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Further evidence for unconscious learning: preliminary support for the conditioning of facial EMG to subliminal stimuli. Bunce SC; Bernat E; Wong PS; Shevrin H J Psychiatr Res; 1999; 33(4):341-7. PubMed ID: 10404472 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Be careful what you say! - Evaluative change based on instructional learning generalizes to other similar stimuli and to the wider category. Luck CC; Patterson RR; Lipp OV Cogn Emot; 2021 Feb; 35(1):169-184. PubMed ID: 32907472 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Verbal instructions targeting valence alter negative conditional stimulus evaluations (but do not affect reinstatement rates). Luck CC; Lipp OV Cogn Emot; 2018 Feb; 32(1):61-80. PubMed ID: 28141482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Learning pain-related fear: neural mechanisms mediating rapid differential conditioning, extinction and reinstatement processes in human visceral pain. Gramsch C; Kattoor J; Icenhour A; Forsting M; Schedlowski M; Gizewski ER; Elsenbruch S Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2014 Dec; 116():36-45. PubMed ID: 25128878 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. No evaluative conditioning effects with briefly presented stimuli. Heycke T; Stahl C Psychol Res; 2020 Jun; 84(4):1020-1027. PubMed ID: 30328506 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Unconscious Desire: The Affective and Motivational Aspects of Subliminal Sexual Priming. Gillath O; Collins T Arch Sex Behav; 2016 Jan; 45(1):5-20. PubMed ID: 26494359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The role of CS-US contingency in human evaluative conditioning. Baeyens F; Hermans D; Eelen P Behav Res Ther; 1993 Nov; 31(8):731-7. PubMed ID: 8257404 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The influence of instructions on generalised valence - conditional stimulus instructions after evaluative conditioning update the explicit and implicit evaluations of generalisation stimuli. Patterson RR; Lipp OV; Luck CC Cogn Emot; 2023; 37(4):666-682. PubMed ID: 36967641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dissociating conscious expectancies from automatic-link formation in an electrodermal conditioning paradigm. Perruchet P; Grégoire L; Aerts K; Poulin-Charronnat B Psychol Res; 2016 Jul; 80(4):581-9. PubMed ID: 26070540 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Electrodermal responses during appetitive conditioning are sensitive to contingency instruction ambiguity. van den Akker K; Nederkoorn C; Jansen A Int J Psychophysiol; 2017 Aug; 118():40-47. PubMed ID: 28614704 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]