These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32046634)

  • 1. Reliability of genomic evaluation for egg quality traits in layers.
    Picard Druet D; Varenne A; Herry F; Hérault F; Allais S; Burlot T; Le Roy P
    BMC Genet; 2020 Feb; 21(1):17. PubMed ID: 32046634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Predicted accuracy of and response to genomic selection for new traits in dairy cattle.
    Calus MP; de Haas Y; Pszczola M; Veerkamp RF
    Animal; 2013 Feb; 7(2):183-91. PubMed ID: 23031684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Genomic prediction of survival time in a population of brown laying hens showing cannibalistic behavior.
    Alemu SW; Calus MP; Muir WM; Peeters K; Vereijken A; Bijma P
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Sep; 48(1):68. PubMed ID: 27623765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of conventional BLUP and single-step genomic BLUP evaluations for yearling weight and carcass traits in Hanwoo beef cattle using single trait and multi-trait models.
    Mehrban H; Lee DH; Naserkheil M; Moradi MH; Ibáñez-Escriche N
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(10):e0223352. PubMed ID: 31609979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A first step toward genomic selection in the multi-breed French dairy goat population.
    Carillier C; Larroque H; Palhière I; Clément V; Rupp R; Robert-Granié C
    J Dairy Sci; 2013; 96(11):7294-7305. PubMed ID: 24054303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Genomic predictions can accelerate selection for resistance against Piscirickettsia salmonis in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar).
    Bangera R; Correa K; Lhorente JP; Figueroa R; Yáñez JM
    BMC Genomics; 2017 Jan; 18(1):121. PubMed ID: 28143402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Genomic selection strategies in a small dairy cattle population evaluated for genetic gain and profit.
    Thomasen JR; Egger-Danner C; Willam A; Guldbrandtsen B; Lund MS; Sørensen AC
    J Dairy Sci; 2014; 97(1):458-70. PubMed ID: 24239076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Genomic selection in dairy cattle simulated populations.
    Seno LO; Guidolin DGF; Aspilcueta-Borquis RR; Nascimento GBD; Silva TBRD; Oliveira HN; Munari DP
    J Dairy Res; 2018 May; 85(2):125-132. PubMed ID: 29785919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of using cow genomic information on accuracy and bias of genomic breeding values in a simulated Holstein dairy cattle population.
    Dehnavi E; Mahyari SA; Schenkel FS; Sargolzaei M
    J Dairy Sci; 2018 Jun; 101(6):5166-5176. PubMed ID: 29605309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Review: Opportunities and challenges for small populations of dairy cattle in the era of genomics.
    Schöpke K; Swalve HH
    Animal; 2016 Jun; 10(6):1050-60. PubMed ID: 26957010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Efficiency of multi-breed genomic selection for dairy cattle breeds with different sizes of reference population.
    Hozé C; Fritz S; Phocas F; Boichard D; Ducrocq V; Croiseau P
    J Dairy Sci; 2014; 97(6):3918-29. PubMed ID: 24704232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Including overseas performance information in genomic evaluations of Australian dairy cattle.
    Haile-Mariam M; Pryce JE; Schrooten C; Hayes BJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2015 May; 98(5):3443-59. PubMed ID: 25771052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Optimal strategies for the use of genomic selection in dairy cattle breeding programs.
    Wensch-Dorendorf M; Yin T; Swalve HH; König S
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Aug; 94(8):4140-51. PubMed ID: 21787949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of genotyped cows in the reference population on the genomic evaluation of Holstein cattle.
    Uemoto Y; Osawa T; Saburi J
    Animal; 2017 Mar; 11(3):382-393. PubMed ID: 27515004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Efficiency of genomic selection in an established commercial layer breeding program.
    Sitzenstock F; Ytournel F; Sharifi AR; Cavero D; Täubert H; Preisinger R; Simianer H
    Genet Sel Evol; 2013 Jul; 45(1):29. PubMed ID: 23902427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Genomic predictions based on animal models using genotype imputation on a national scale in Norwegian Red cattle.
    Meuwissen TH; Svendsen M; Solberg T; Ødegård J
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Oct; 47():79. PubMed ID: 26464226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Identification of Promising Mutants Associated with Egg Production Traits Revealed by Genome-Wide Association Study.
    Yuan J; Sun C; Dou T; Yi G; Qu L; Qu L; Wang K; Yang N
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(10):e0140615. PubMed ID: 26496084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Genomic prediction for Nordic Red Cattle using one-step and selection index blending.
    Su G; Madsen P; Nielsen US; Mäntysaari EA; Aamand GP; Christensen OF; Lund MS
    J Dairy Sci; 2012 Feb; 95(2):909-17. PubMed ID: 22281355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Application of Bayesian least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and BayesCπ methods for genomic selection in French Holstein and Montbéliarde breeds.
    Colombani C; Legarra A; Fritz S; Guillaume F; Croiseau P; Ducrocq V; Robert-Granié C
    J Dairy Sci; 2013 Jan; 96(1):575-91. PubMed ID: 23127905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Short communication: The combined use of linkage disequilibrium-based haploblocks and allele frequency-based haplotype selection methods enhances genomic evaluation accuracy in dairy cattle.
    Jónás D; Ducrocq V; Croiseau P
    J Dairy Sci; 2017 Apr; 100(4):2905-2908. PubMed ID: 28161173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.