BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32047058)

  • 1. Toward Standards in Clinical Microbiota Studies: Comparison of Three DNA Extraction Methods and Two Bioinformatic Pipelines.
    Ducarmon QR; Hornung BVH; Geelen AR; Kuijper EJ; Zwittink RD
    mSystems; 2020 Feb; 5(1):. PubMed ID: 32047058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Refinement of 16S rRNA gene analysis for low biomass biospecimens.
    Villette R; Autaa G; Hind S; Holm JB; Moreno-Sabater A; Larsen M
    Sci Rep; 2021 May; 11(1):10741. PubMed ID: 34031485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Developing whole cell standards for the microbiome field.
    Sergaki C; Anwar S; Fritzsche M; Mate R; Francis RJ; MacLellan-Gibson K; Logan A; Amos GCA
    Microbiome; 2022 Aug; 10(1):123. PubMed ID: 35945640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Primer, Pipelines, Parameters: Issues in 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing.
    Abellan-Schneyder I; Matchado MS; Reitmeier S; Sommer A; Sewald Z; Baumbach J; List M; Neuhaus K
    mSphere; 2021 Feb; 6(1):. PubMed ID: 33627512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of sequencing platforms and bioinformatics pipelines for compositional analysis of the gut microbiome.
    Allali I; Arnold JW; Roach J; Cadenas MB; Butz N; Hassan HM; Koci M; Ballou A; Mendoza M; Ali R; Azcarate-Peril MA
    BMC Microbiol; 2017 Sep; 17(1):194. PubMed ID: 28903732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. High-throughput DNA extraction strategy for fecal microbiome studies.
    Isokääntä H; Tomnikov N; Vanhatalo S; Munukka E; Huovinen P; Hakanen AJ; Kallonen T
    Microbiol Spectr; 2024 Jun; 12(6):e0293223. PubMed ID: 38747618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comprehensive Wet-Bench and Bioinformatics Workflow for Complex Microbiota Using Oxford Nanopore Technologies.
    Ammer-Herrmenau C; Pfisterer N; van den Berg T; Gavrilova I; Amanzada A; Singh SK; Khalil A; Alili R; Belda E; Clement K; Abd El Wahed A; Gady EE; Haubrock M; Beißbarth T; Ellenrieder V; Neesse A
    mSystems; 2021 Aug; 6(4):e0075021. PubMed ID: 34427527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Optimisation of 16S rRNA gut microbiota profiling of extremely low birth weight infants.
    Alcon-Giner C; Caim S; Mitra S; Ketskemety J; Wegmann U; Wain J; Belteki G; Clarke P; Hall LJ
    BMC Genomics; 2017 Nov; 18(1):841. PubMed ID: 29096601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Taxonomic annotation of 16S rRNA sequences of pig intestinal samples using MG-RAST and QIIME2 generated different microbiota compositions.
    Lima J; Manning T; Rutherford KM; Baima ET; Dewhurst RJ; Walsh P; Roehe R
    J Microbiol Methods; 2021 Jul; 186():106235. PubMed ID: 33974954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Choice of DNA extraction method affects detection of bacterial taxa from retail chicken breast.
    Flint A; Laidlaw A; Li L; Raitt C; Rao M; Cooper A; Weedmark K; Carrillo C; Tamber S
    BMC Microbiol; 2022 Sep; 22(1):230. PubMed ID: 36180850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Does the human placenta delivered at term have a microbiota? Results of cultivation, quantitative real-time PCR, 16S rRNA gene sequencing, and metagenomics.
    Theis KR; Romero R; Winters AD; Greenberg JM; Gomez-Lopez N; Alhousseini A; Bieda J; Maymon E; Pacora P; Fettweis JM; Buck GA; Jefferson KK; Strauss JF; Erez O; Hassan SS
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Mar; 220(3):267.e1-267.e39. PubMed ID: 30832984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Whole lung tissue is the preferred sampling method for amplicon-based characterization of murine lung microbiota.
    Baker JM; Hinkle KJ; McDonald RA; Brown CA; Falkowski NR; Huffnagle GB; Dickson RP
    Microbiome; 2021 May; 9(1):99. PubMed ID: 33952355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A framework for assessing 16S rRNA marker-gene survey data analysis methods using mixtures.
    Olson ND; Kumar MS; Li S; Braccia DJ; Hao S; Timp W; Salit ML; Stine OC; Bravo HC
    Microbiome; 2020 Mar; 8(1):35. PubMed ID: 32169095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact of DNA extraction, sample dilution, and reagent contamination on 16S rRNA gene sequencing of human feces.
    Velásquez-Mejía EP; de la Cuesta-Zuluaga J; Escobar JS
    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2018 Jan; 102(1):403-411. PubMed ID: 29079861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An inter-laboratory study to investigate the impact of the bioinformatics component on microbiome analysis using mock communities.
    O'Sullivan DM; Doyle RM; Temisak S; Redshaw N; Whale AS; Logan G; Huang J; Fischer N; Amos GCA; Preston MD; Marchesi JR; Wagner J; Parkhill J; Motro Y; Denise H; Finn RD; Harris KA; Kay GL; O'Grady J; Ransom-Jones E; Wu H; Laing E; Studholme DJ; Benavente ED; Phelan J; Clark TG; Moran-Gilad J; Huggett JF
    Sci Rep; 2021 May; 11(1):10590. PubMed ID: 34012005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impact of DNA Extraction Method on Variation in Human and Built Environment Microbial Community and Functional Profiles Assessed by Shotgun Metagenomics Sequencing.
    Sui HY; Weil AA; Nuwagira E; Qadri F; Ryan ET; Mezzari MP; Phipatanakul W; Lai PS
    Front Microbiol; 2020; 11():953. PubMed ID: 32528434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reducing bias in microbiome research: Comparing methods from sample collection to sequencing.
    Kool J; Tymchenko L; Shetty SA; Fuentes S
    Front Microbiol; 2023; 14():1094800. PubMed ID: 37065158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Direct PCR Offers a Fast and Reliable Alternative to Conventional DNA Isolation Methods for Gut Microbiomes.
    Videvall E; Strandh M; Engelbrecht A; Cloete S; Cornwallis CK
    mSystems; 2017; 2(6):. PubMed ID: 29181448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of DNA extraction methods on 16S rRNA-based profiling of bacterial communities in cheese.
    Markusková B; Minarovičová J; Véghová A; Drahovská H; Kaclíková E
    J Microbiol Methods; 2021 May; 184():106210. PubMed ID: 33774112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Comparison of gut microbiotal compositional analysis of patients with irritable bowel syndrome through different bioinformatics pipelines].
    Zhu SW; Liu ZJ; Li M; Zhu HQ; Duan LP
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2018 Apr; 50(2):231-238. PubMed ID: 29643520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.