These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32047058)

  • 1. Toward Standards in Clinical Microbiota Studies: Comparison of Three DNA Extraction Methods and Two Bioinformatic Pipelines.
    Ducarmon QR; Hornung BVH; Geelen AR; Kuijper EJ; Zwittink RD
    mSystems; 2020 Feb; 5(1):. PubMed ID: 32047058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Refinement of 16S rRNA gene analysis for low biomass biospecimens.
    Villette R; Autaa G; Hind S; Holm JB; Moreno-Sabater A; Larsen M
    Sci Rep; 2021 May; 11(1):10741. PubMed ID: 34031485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Developing whole cell standards for the microbiome field.
    Sergaki C; Anwar S; Fritzsche M; Mate R; Francis RJ; MacLellan-Gibson K; Logan A; Amos GCA
    Microbiome; 2022 Aug; 10(1):123. PubMed ID: 35945640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Primer, Pipelines, Parameters: Issues in 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing.
    Abellan-Schneyder I; Matchado MS; Reitmeier S; Sommer A; Sewald Z; Baumbach J; List M; Neuhaus K
    mSphere; 2021 Feb; 6(1):. PubMed ID: 33627512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of sequencing platforms and bioinformatics pipelines for compositional analysis of the gut microbiome.
    Allali I; Arnold JW; Roach J; Cadenas MB; Butz N; Hassan HM; Koci M; Ballou A; Mendoza M; Ali R; Azcarate-Peril MA
    BMC Microbiol; 2017 Sep; 17(1):194. PubMed ID: 28903732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comprehensive Wet-Bench and Bioinformatics Workflow for Complex Microbiota Using Oxford Nanopore Technologies.
    Ammer-Herrmenau C; Pfisterer N; van den Berg T; Gavrilova I; Amanzada A; Singh SK; Khalil A; Alili R; Belda E; Clement K; Abd El Wahed A; Gady EE; Haubrock M; Beißbarth T; Ellenrieder V; Neesse A
    mSystems; 2021 Aug; 6(4):e0075021. PubMed ID: 34427527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Optimisation of 16S rRNA gut microbiota profiling of extremely low birth weight infants.
    Alcon-Giner C; Caim S; Mitra S; Ketskemety J; Wegmann U; Wain J; Belteki G; Clarke P; Hall LJ
    BMC Genomics; 2017 Nov; 18(1):841. PubMed ID: 29096601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Taxonomic annotation of 16S rRNA sequences of pig intestinal samples using MG-RAST and QIIME2 generated different microbiota compositions.
    Lima J; Manning T; Rutherford KM; Baima ET; Dewhurst RJ; Walsh P; Roehe R
    J Microbiol Methods; 2021 Jul; 186():106235. PubMed ID: 33974954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Choice of DNA extraction method affects detection of bacterial taxa from retail chicken breast.
    Flint A; Laidlaw A; Li L; Raitt C; Rao M; Cooper A; Weedmark K; Carrillo C; Tamber S
    BMC Microbiol; 2022 Sep; 22(1):230. PubMed ID: 36180850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Whole lung tissue is the preferred sampling method for amplicon-based characterization of murine lung microbiota.
    Baker JM; Hinkle KJ; McDonald RA; Brown CA; Falkowski NR; Huffnagle GB; Dickson RP
    Microbiome; 2021 May; 9(1):99. PubMed ID: 33952355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A framework for assessing 16S rRNA marker-gene survey data analysis methods using mixtures.
    Olson ND; Kumar MS; Li S; Braccia DJ; Hao S; Timp W; Salit ML; Stine OC; Bravo HC
    Microbiome; 2020 Mar; 8(1):35. PubMed ID: 32169095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact of DNA extraction, sample dilution, and reagent contamination on 16S rRNA gene sequencing of human feces.
    Velásquez-Mejía EP; de la Cuesta-Zuluaga J; Escobar JS
    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2018 Jan; 102(1):403-411. PubMed ID: 29079861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An inter-laboratory study to investigate the impact of the bioinformatics component on microbiome analysis using mock communities.
    O'Sullivan DM; Doyle RM; Temisak S; Redshaw N; Whale AS; Logan G; Huang J; Fischer N; Amos GCA; Preston MD; Marchesi JR; Wagner J; Parkhill J; Motro Y; Denise H; Finn RD; Harris KA; Kay GL; O'Grady J; Ransom-Jones E; Wu H; Laing E; Studholme DJ; Benavente ED; Phelan J; Clark TG; Moran-Gilad J; Huggett JF
    Sci Rep; 2021 May; 11(1):10590. PubMed ID: 34012005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact of DNA Extraction Method on Variation in Human and Built Environment Microbial Community and Functional Profiles Assessed by Shotgun Metagenomics Sequencing.
    Sui HY; Weil AA; Nuwagira E; Qadri F; Ryan ET; Mezzari MP; Phipatanakul W; Lai PS
    Front Microbiol; 2020; 11():953. PubMed ID: 32528434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reducing bias in microbiome research: Comparing methods from sample collection to sequencing.
    Kool J; Tymchenko L; Shetty SA; Fuentes S
    Front Microbiol; 2023; 14():1094800. PubMed ID: 37065158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Direct PCR Offers a Fast and Reliable Alternative to Conventional DNA Isolation Methods for Gut Microbiomes.
    Videvall E; Strandh M; Engelbrecht A; Cloete S; Cornwallis CK
    mSystems; 2017; 2(6):. PubMed ID: 29181448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of DNA extraction methods on 16S rRNA-based profiling of bacterial communities in cheese.
    Markusková B; Minarovičová J; Véghová A; Drahovská H; Kaclíková E
    J Microbiol Methods; 2021 May; 184():106210. PubMed ID: 33774112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Comparison of gut microbiotal compositional analysis of patients with irritable bowel syndrome through different bioinformatics pipelines].
    Zhu SW; Liu ZJ; Li M; Zhu HQ; Duan LP
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2018 Apr; 50(2):231-238. PubMed ID: 29643520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Are all faecal bacteria detected with equal efficiency? A study using next-generation sequencing and quantitative culture of infants' faecal samples.
    Sjöberg F; Nookaew I; Yazdanshenas S; Gio-Batta M; Adlerberth I; Wold AE
    J Microbiol Methods; 2020 Oct; 177():106018. PubMed ID: 32795633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Microbiome depiction through user-adapted bioinformatic pipelines and parameters.
    Nayman EI; Schwartz BA; Polanco FC; Firek AK; Gumabong AC; Hofstee NJ; Narasimhan G; Cickovski T; Mathee K
    J Med Microbiol; 2023 Oct; 72(10):. PubMed ID: 37823280
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.