These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. King's College London's enquiry into Hans J Eysenck's 'Unsafe' publications must be properly completed. Marks DF; Buchanan RD J Health Psychol; 2020 Jan; 25(1):3-6. PubMed ID: 31841048 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Disgraced cloner's ally is cleared of misconduct. Marris E; Check E Nature; 2006 Feb; 439(7078):768-9. PubMed ID: 16482112 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Collateral damage: How a case of misconduct brought a leading Japanese biology institute to its knees. Cyranoski D Nature; 2015 Apr; 520(7549):600-3. PubMed ID: 25925457 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Purdue dogged by misconduct claims. Reich ES Nature; 2007 May; 447(7142):238-9. PubMed ID: 17507941 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Researchers frustrated by Italian misconduct probe. Abbott A Nature; 2017 May; 545(7652):13-14. PubMed ID: 28470221 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. The time is right to confront misconduct. Macilwain C Nature; 2012 Aug; 488(7409):7. PubMed ID: 22859166 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Prominent spider biologist spun a web of questionable data. Pennisi E Science; 2020 Feb; 367(6478):613-614. PubMed ID: 32029607 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Scientific misconduct. Cleaning up the paper trail. Couzin J; Unger K Science; 2006 Apr; 312(5770):38-43. PubMed ID: 16601164 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Refine retraction notices to avoid damaging fallout. Xu SB; Hu G Nature; 2023 Feb; 614(7949):624. PubMed ID: 36810885 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Publication rates after the first retraction for biomedical researchers with multiple retracted publications. Mistry V; Grey A; Bolland MJ Account Res; 2019 Jul; 26(5):277-287. PubMed ID: 31025884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Italian papers on genetically modified crops under investigation. Abbott A Nature; 2016 Jan; 529(7586):268-9. PubMed ID: 26791701 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Dana-Farber retractions: meet the blogger who spotted problems in dozens of cancer papers. Kozlov M Nature; 2024 Feb; 626(7997):16-17. PubMed ID: 38267558 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Mistakes and misconduct in the research literature: retractions just the tip of the iceberg. Poulton A Med J Aust; 2007 Mar; 186(6):323-4. PubMed ID: 17371220 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Meyer: disagreements but no misconduct. Vences M; Zardoya R Nature; 2004 Sep; 431(7008):505. PubMed ID: 15457231 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Retraction record rocks community. Cyranoski D Nature; 2012 Sep; 489(7416):346-7. PubMed ID: 22996524 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Paolo Macchiarini's academic afterlife in Russia ends. Astakhova A Science; 2017 May; 356(6339):672-673. PubMed ID: 28522475 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Iranian paper sparks sense of déjà vu. Butler D Nature; 2008 Oct; 455(7216):1019. PubMed ID: 18948918 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Flawed ivermectin preprint highlights challenges of COVID drug studies. Reardon S Nature; 2021 Aug; 596(7871):173-174. PubMed ID: 34341573 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]