147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32047306)
21. Stem-cell method faces fresh questions.
Cyranoski D
Nature; 2014 Mar; 507(7492):283. PubMed ID: 24646974
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. King's College London's enquiry into Hans J Eysenck's 'Unsafe' publications must be properly completed.
Marks DF; Buchanan RD
J Health Psychol; 2020 Jan; 25(1):3-6. PubMed ID: 31841048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Disgraced cloner's ally is cleared of misconduct.
Marris E; Check E
Nature; 2006 Feb; 439(7078):768-9. PubMed ID: 16482112
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Collateral damage: How a case of misconduct brought a leading Japanese biology institute to its knees.
Cyranoski D
Nature; 2015 Apr; 520(7549):600-3. PubMed ID: 25925457
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Blow follows blow for stem-cell work.
Cyranoski D
Nature; 2006 Jan; 439(7072):8. PubMed ID: 16397471
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Purdue dogged by misconduct claims.
Reich ES
Nature; 2007 May; 447(7142):238-9. PubMed ID: 17507941
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Researchers frustrated by Italian misconduct probe.
Abbott A
Nature; 2017 May; 545(7652):13-14. PubMed ID: 28470221
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. The time is right to confront misconduct.
Macilwain C
Nature; 2012 Aug; 488(7409):7. PubMed ID: 22859166
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Prominent spider biologist spun a web of questionable data.
Pennisi E
Science; 2020 Feb; 367(6478):613-614. PubMed ID: 32029607
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Scientific misconduct. Cleaning up the paper trail.
Couzin J; Unger K
Science; 2006 Apr; 312(5770):38-43. PubMed ID: 16601164
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Refine retraction notices to avoid damaging fallout.
Xu SB; Hu G
Nature; 2023 Feb; 614(7949):624. PubMed ID: 36810885
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Publication rates after the first retraction for biomedical researchers with multiple retracted publications.
Mistry V; Grey A; Bolland MJ
Account Res; 2019 Jul; 26(5):277-287. PubMed ID: 31025884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Italian papers on genetically modified crops under investigation.
Abbott A
Nature; 2016 Jan; 529(7586):268-9. PubMed ID: 26791701
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Dana-Farber retractions: meet the blogger who spotted problems in dozens of cancer papers.
Kozlov M
Nature; 2024 Feb; 626(7997):16-17. PubMed ID: 38267558
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Mistakes and misconduct in the research literature: retractions just the tip of the iceberg.
Poulton A
Med J Aust; 2007 Mar; 186(6):323-4. PubMed ID: 17371220
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Meyer: disagreements but no misconduct.
Vences M; Zardoya R
Nature; 2004 Sep; 431(7008):505. PubMed ID: 15457231
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Retraction record rocks community.
Cyranoski D
Nature; 2012 Sep; 489(7416):346-7. PubMed ID: 22996524
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Paolo Macchiarini's academic afterlife in Russia ends.
Astakhova A
Science; 2017 May; 356(6339):672-673. PubMed ID: 28522475
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Iranian paper sparks sense of déjà vu.
Butler D
Nature; 2008 Oct; 455(7216):1019. PubMed ID: 18948918
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Flawed ivermectin preprint highlights challenges of COVID drug studies.
Reardon S
Nature; 2021 Aug; 596(7871):173-174. PubMed ID: 34341573
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
