BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32049607)

  • 1. Evaluation of the exposure prediction component of Control of Substances Hazardous to Health Essentials.
    Kimbrough LJ; Oestenstad RK; Beasley TM
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2020; 17(2-3):97-108. PubMed ID: 32049607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of COSHH Essentials for vapor degreasing and bag filling operations.
    Jones RM; Nicas M
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2006 Mar; 50(2):137-47. PubMed ID: 16172141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of COSHH essentials: methylene chloride, isopropanol, and acetone exposures in a small printing plant.
    Lee EG; Harper M; Bowen RB; Slaven J
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2009 Jul; 53(5):463-74. PubMed ID: 19435980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of the COSHH Essentials model with a mixture of organic chemicals at a medium-sized paint producer.
    Lee EG; Slaven J; Bowen RB; Harper M
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2011 Jan; 55(1):16-29. PubMed ID: 21047985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An Assessment of the Robustness of the COSHH-Essentials (C-E) Target Airborne Concentration Ranges 15 Years on, and Their Usefulness for Determining Control Measures.
    Vaughan NP; Rajan-Sithamparanadarajah R
    Ann Work Expo Health; 2017 Apr; 61(3):270-283. PubMed ID: 28355421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. On the Strength and Validity of Hazard Banding.
    Scheffers T; Doornaert B; Berne N; van Breukelen G; Leplay A; van Miert E
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2016 Nov; 60(9):1049-1061. PubMed ID: 27621219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of chemical risk assessment methods in South Korea and the United Kingdom.
    Kim MU; Shin S; Byeon SH
    J Occup Health; 2015; 57(4):339-45. PubMed ID: 25891351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Controlling exposure to chemicals: a simple guide.
    Hay A
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2006 Sep; 1076():790-9. PubMed ID: 17119256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of the HSE COSHH Essentials exposure predictive model on the basis of BAuA field studies and existing substances exposure data.
    Tischer M; Bredendiek-Kämper S; Poppek U
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2003 Oct; 47(7):557-69. PubMed ID: 14530182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analysis of factors affecting containment with extracted partial enclosures using computational fluid dynamics.
    Batt RL; Kelsey A
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2014 Mar; 58(2):227-40. PubMed ID: 24232543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Risk management measures for chemicals: the "COSHH essentials" approach.
    Garrod AN; Evans PG; Davy CW
    J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol; 2007 Dec; 17 Suppl 1():S48-54. PubMed ID: 17565355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Margins of safety provided by COSHH Essentials and the ILO Chemical Control Toolkit.
    Jones RM; Nicas M
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2006 Mar; 50(2):149-56. PubMed ID: 16172140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Developing COSHH Essentials: dermal exposure, personal protective equipment and first aid.
    Garrod AN; Rajan-Sithamparanadarajah R
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2003 Oct; 47(7):577-88. PubMed ID: 14530184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. 'Stoffenmanager', a web-based control banding tool using an exposure process model.
    Marquart H; Heussen H; Le Feber M; Noy D; Tielemans E; Schinkel J; West J; Van Der Schaaf D
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2008 Aug; 52(6):429-41. PubMed ID: 18587140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Predictive models for the assessment of occupational exposure to chemicals: a new challenge for employers].
    Gromiec JP; Kupczewska-Dobecka M; Jankowska A; Czerczak S
    Med Pr; 2013; 64(5):699-716. PubMed ID: 24502133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Do EASE scenarios fit workplace reality? A validation study of the EASE model. Estimation and Assessment of Substance Exposure.
    Bredendiek-Kämper S
    Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2001 Feb; 16(2):182-7. PubMed ID: 11217709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Occupational exposure limits for chemicals.
    Topping M
    Occup Environ Med; 2001 Feb; 58(2):138-44. PubMed ID: 11160994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of the utility and reliability of COSHH Essentials.
    Money C; Bailey S; Smith M; Hay A; Hudspith B; Tolley D; Dobbie J; Jackson H
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2006 Aug; 50(6):642-3; author reply 643-4. PubMed ID: 16844718
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of COSHH Essentials for vapour degreasing and bag-filling operations.
    Evans P; Garrod A
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2006 Aug; 50(6):641. PubMed ID: 16916884
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Training health and safety committees to use control banding: lessons learned and opportunities for the United States.
    Bracker AL; Morse TF; Simcox NJ
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2009 May; 6(5):307-14. PubMed ID: 19283620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.